Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brain may be tuned to evaluate aesthetic perception through perceptual chunking when we observe the grace of the dancer. We modelled biomechanical metrics to explain biological determinants of aesthetic perception in dance. Eighteen expert (EXP) and intermediate (INT) dancers performed développé arabesque in three conditions: (1) slow tempo, (2) slow tempo with relevé, and (3) fast tempo. To compare biomechanical metrics of kinematic data, we calculated intra-excursion variability, principal component analysis (PCA), and dimensionless jerk for the gesture limb. Observers, all trained dancers, viewed motion capture stick figures of the trials and ranked each for aesthetic (1) proficiency and (2) movement smoothness. Statistical analyses included group by condition repeated-measures ANOVA for metric data; Mann–Whitney U rank and Friedman’s rank tests for nonparametric rank data; Spearman’s rho correlations to compare aesthetic rankings and metrics; and linear regression to examine which metric best quantified observers’ aesthetic rankings, p < 0.05. The goodness of fit of the proposed models was determined using Akaike information criteria. Aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings of the dance movements revealed differences between groups and condition, p < 0.0001. EXP dancers were rated more aesthetically proficient than INT dancers. The slow and fast conditions were judged more aesthetically proficient than slow with relevé (p < 0.0001). Of the metrics, PCA best captured the differences due to group and condition. PCA also provided the most parsimonious model to explain aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings. By permitting organization of large data sets into simpler groupings, PCA may mirror the phenomenon of chunking in which the brain combines sensory motor elements into integrated units of behaviour. In this representation, the chunk of information which is remembered, and to which the observer reacts, is the elemental mode shape of the motion rather than physical displacements. This suggests that reduction in redundant information to a simplistic dimensionality is related to the experienced observer’s aesthetic perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy B, Zawi K, Jackson RC (2008) Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception 37:931–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11:1109–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angioi M, Metsios GS, Twitchett E, Koutedakis Y, Wyon M (2009) Association between selected physical fitness parameters and esthetic competence in contemporary dancers. J Dance Med Sci 13:115–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Autere A (2013) The feeling balletbody. Dorrance Publishing Co Inc, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian S, Melendez-Calderon A, Burdet E (2012) A robust and sensitive metric for quantifying movement smoothness. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:2126–2136. doi:10.1109/TBME.2011.2179545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bläsing BE (2014) Segmentation of dance movement: effects of expertise, visual familiarity, motor experience and music. Front Psychol 5:1500 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01500

  • Bläsing B, Calvo-Merino B, Cross ES, Jola C, Honisch J, Stevens CJ (2012) Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. Acta Psychol 139:300–308. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronner S (2012) Differences in segmental coordination and postural control in a multi-joint dance movement: developpe arabesque. J Dance Med Sci 16:26–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grezes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P (2005) Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 15:1243–1249. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino B, Jola C, Glaser DE, Haggard P (2008) Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Conscious Cogn 17:911–922. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino B, Ehrenberg S, Leung D, Haggard P (2010) Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation. Psychol Res 74:400–406. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield SJ, Byrnes WC (1990) Correlational analysis of aesthetic competency, skill acquisition and physiologic capabilities of modern dancers. In: 5th Hong Kong international dance conference Hong Kong. The Secretariat of the Hong Kong Academy for the Performing Arts, pp 79–100

  • Chatterjee A (2003) Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bull Psychol Arts 4:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ (2008) Moving on time: brain network for auditory-motor synchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. J Cogn Neurosci 20:226–239. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M (2008) Coordination changes in a discrete multi-articular action as a function of practice. Acta Psychol 127:163–176. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JF, Nadal M, Cela-Conde CJ (2014) A norming study and library of 203 dance movements. Perception 43:178–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SJ (1997) Dance and the question of fidelity. J Aesthet Educ 31:51–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross I (2012) Cognitive science and the cultural nature of music. Top Cogn Sci 4:668–677. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01216.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross ES, Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2006) Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31:1257–1267. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross ES, Kirsch L, Ticini LF, Schutz-Bosbach S (2011a) The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Front Hum Neurosci 5:102. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross ES, Kirsch LP, Ticini LF, Schütz-Bosbach S (2011b) The impact of aesthetice evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Front Hum Neurosci 5:1–10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Beek PJ (2004) PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:415–428 doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.005

  • Daprati E, Iosa M, Haggard P (2009) A dance to the music of time: aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS One 4:e5023. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005023

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Pereira MP, Gómez-Conde I, Escalona M, Olivieri DN (2014) Automatic recognition and scoring of olympic rhythmic gymnastic movements. Hum Mov Sci 34:63–80. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Flash T (2009) Trajectory of the index finger during grasping. Exp Brain Res 196:497–509. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1878-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet F (2005) Chunking models of expertise: implications for education. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn I (2005) Dance perception and the brain. In: Grove R, Stevens C, McKenchnie S (eds) Thinking in four dimensions: creativity and cognition in contemporary dance. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, p 211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill J, van Emmerik RE, Heiderscheit BC, Li L (1999) A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin Biomech 14:297–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill J, McDermott WJ, Haddad JM (2000) Issues in quantifying variability from a dynamical systems perspective. J Appl Biomech 16:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AE, Paul MA, Beuger B, Tipper SP (2008) Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze. Psychol Res 72:461–472. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0125-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hein T, Schmeltzpfenning T, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T, Grau S (2012) Using the variability of continuous relative phase as a measure to discriminate between healthy and injured runners. Hum Mov Sci 31:683–694. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Flash T (1987) Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination. TINS 10:170–174. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(87)90043-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Sternad D (2009) Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests. J Mot Behav 41:529–534. doi:10.3200/35-09-004-RC

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands K, Wing A, Daffertshofer A (2004) Principal components analysis of contemporary dance kinematics. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE EMBSS UK & RI postgraduate conference in biomedical engineering & medical physics. University of Southampton, UK

  • Hong SL, Newell KM (2006) Change in the organization of degrees of freedom with learning. J Mot Behav 38:88–100. doi:10.3200/JMBR.38.2.88-100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hreljac A (1993) The relationship between smoothness and performance during the practice of a lower limb obstacle avoidance task. Biol Cybern 68:375–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hreljac A (2000) Stride smoothness evaluation of runners and other athletes. Gait Posture 11:199–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janata P, Grafton ST (2003) Swinging in the brain: shared neural substrates for behaviors related to sequencing and music. Nat Neurosci 6:682–687. doi:10.1038/nn1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis DN, Smith JA, Kulig K (2014) Trunk coordination in dancers and nondancers. J Appl Biomech 30:547–554. doi:10.1123/jab.2013-0329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jola C, Grosbras MH (2013) In the here and now: enhanced motor corticospinal excitability in novices when watching live compared to video recorded dance. Cogn Neurosci 4:90–98. doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.776035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics, 2nd ed. Springer, New York

  • Kavanagh JJ (2009) Lower trunk motion and speed-dependence during walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6:9. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer AW, Riley MA, Shockley K, Sitton CA, Hewett TE, Cummins-Sebree S, Haas JG (2011) Multi-segmental postural coordination in professional ballet dancers. Gait Posture 34:76–80. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer AW et al (2013) Inter-segmental postural coordination measures differentiate athletes with ACL reconstruction from uninjured athletes. Gait Posture 37:149–153. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.005

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch LP, Drommelschmidt KA, Cross ES (2013) The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko YG, Challis JH, Newell KM (2003) Learning to coordinate redundant degrees of freedom in a dynamic balance task. Hum Mov Sci 22:47–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnow D, Chatfield SJ (2009) Development of the “performance competence evaluation measure”: assessing qualitative aspects of dance performance. J Dance Med Sci 13:101–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus RG, Hilsendager SC, Gottschild BD (1991) The meaning of dance. In: History of the dance in art and education, 3rd edn. Prentise Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 420

  • Kwon Y-H, Wilson M, Ryu J-H (2007) Analysis of the hip joint moments in grand rond de jambe en l’air. J Dance Med Sci 11:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Land WM, Volchenkov D, Blasing BE, Schack T (2013) From action representation to action execution: exploring the links between cognitive and biomechanical levels of motor control. Front Comput Neurosci 7:127. doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00127

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol 95:489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Looney MA (2004) Evaluating judge performance in sport. J Appl Meas 5:31–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miura N et al (2010) Effect of motion smoothness on brain activity while observing a dance: an fMRI study using a humanoid robot. Soc Neurosci 5:40–58. doi:10.1080/17470910903083256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montero B (2012) Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge. Phenom Cogn Sci 11:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgs G, Hagura N, Haggard P (2013) Learning to like it: aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Conscious Cogn 22:603–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pajek MB, Cuk I, Pajek J, Kovac M, Leskosek B (2013) Is the quality of judging in women artistic gymnastics equivalent at major competitions of different levels? J Hum Kinet 37:173–181. doi:10.2478/hukin-2013-0038

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard CD, Heiderscheit BC, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J (2005) Gender differences in lower extremity coupling variability during an unanticipated cutting maneuver. J Appl Biomech 21:143–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Hopper LS, Elliott BC, Ackland TR (2013) Lower limb kinematic variability in dancers performing drop landings onto floor surfaces with varied mechanical properties. Hum Mov Sci 32:866–874. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer B et al (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297–8304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Nakamura K (2004) Emergence of rhythm during motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 8:547–553. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato N, Nunome H, Ikegami Y (2014) Key features of hip hop dance motions affect evaluation by judges. J Appl Biomech 30:439–445. doi:10.1123/jab.2013-0190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider K, Zernicke RF (1989) Jerk-cost modulations during the practice of rapid arm movements. Biol Cybern 60:221–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seay JF, Van Emmerik RE, Hamill J (2011) Low back pain status affects pelvis-trunk coordination and variability during walking and running. Clin Biomech 26:572–578. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevdalis V, Keller PE (2011) Perceiving performer identity and intended expression intensity in point-light displays of dance. Psychol Res 75:423–434. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0312-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Siemienski A, Popovich JM, Kulig K (2012) Intra-task variability of trunk coordination during a rate-controlled bipedal dance jump. J Sports Sci 30:139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stergiou N, Decker LM (2011) Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: Is there a connection? Hum Mov Sci 30:869–888. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.002

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens CJ et al (2009) Cognition and the temporal arts: investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67:800–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens C, Winskel H, Howell C, Vidal LM, Latimer C, Milne-Home J (2010a) Perceiving dance: schematic expectations guide experts’ scanning of a contemporary dance film. J Dance Med Sci 14:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens CJ, Ginsborg J, Lester G (2010b) Backwards and forwards in space and time: recalling dance movement from long-term memory. Mem Stud 4:234–250. doi:10.1177/1750698010387018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark M (2008) The mathematical universe. Found Phys 38:101–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings HL, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE, Adler CH (1997) Parkinsonism reduces coordination of fingers, wrist, and arm in fine motor control. Exp Neurol 146:159–170. doi:10.1006/exnr.1997.6507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torrents C, Castañer M, Jofre T, Morey G, Reverter F (2013) Kinematic parameters that influence the aesthetic perception of beauty in contemporary dance. Perception 42:447–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng YW, Scholz JP, Schoner G, Hotchkiss L (2003) Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 149:276–288. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1357-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincs K, Barbour K (2014) Snapshots of complexity: using motion capture and principal component analysis to reconceptualise dance. Digit Creat 25:62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volchenkov D, Bläsing B (2013) Spatio-temporal analysis of kinematic signals in classical ballet. J Comput Sci 4:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volchenkov D, Bläsing BE, Schack T (2014) Spatio-temporal kinematic decomposition of movements. Engineering 6:385–398 http://www.scirp.org/journal/eng. doi:10.4236/eng.2014.68041

  • Wagner H, Pfusterschmied J, Klous M, von Duvillard SP, Muller E (2012) Movement variability and skill level of various throwing techniques. Hum Mov Sci 31:78–90. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Lim B-O, Kim Y-H (2004) Rond de jambe en l’air skilled versus novice ballet dancers. J Dance Med Sci 8:108–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Simpson SE, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J (2008) Coordination variability and skill development in expert triple jumpers. Sports Biomech 7:2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan JH, Dick MB (2006) Practice effects on motor control in healthy seniors and patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13:385–410. doi:10.1080/138255890969609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young C, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2014) Judging complex movement performances for excellence: a principal components analysis-based technique applied to competitive diving. Hum Mov Sci 36:107–122. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the participating dancers and other volunteers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ADAM Center, 90 Eighth Ave. #11B, Brooklyn, NY, 11215, USA

    Shaw Bronner

  2. Brain Function Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St., Suite 902, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    Shaw Bronner

  3. Department of Industrial Design, Coventry University, Priory St, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK

    James Shippen

Authors
  1. Shaw Bronner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Shippen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaw Bronner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 59 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 2785 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 3325 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bronner, S., Shippen, J. Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance. Exp Brain Res 233, 3565–3581 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation