Abstract
Despite attentional prioritization for grasping space near the hands, tool-use appears to transfer attentional bias to the tool’s end/functional part. The contributions of haptic and visual inputs to attentional distribution along a tool were investigated as a function of tool-use in near (Experiment 1) and far (Experiment 2) space. Visual attention was assessed with a 50/50, go/no-go, target discrimination task, while a tool was held next to targets appearing near the tool-occupied hand or tool-end. Target response times (RTs) and sensitivity (d-prime) were measured at target locations, before and after functional tool practice for three conditions: (1) open-tool: tool-end visible (visual + haptic inputs), (2) hidden-tool: tool-end visually obscured (haptic input only), and (3) short-tool: stick missing tool’s length/end (control condition: hand occupied but no visual/haptic input). In near space, both open- and hidden-tool groups showed a tool-end, attentional bias (faster RTs toward tool-end) before practice; after practice, RTs near the hand improved. In far space, the open-tool group showed no bias before practice; after practice, target RTs near the tool-end improved. However, the hidden-tool group showed a consistent tool-end bias despite practice. Lack of short-tool group results suggested that hidden-tool group results were specific to haptic inputs. In conclusion, (1) allocation of visual attention along a tool due to tool practice differs in near and far space, and (2) visual attention is drawn toward the tool’s end even when visually obscured, suggesting haptic input provides sufficient information for directing attention along the tool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams RA, Davoli CC, Du F, Knapp WH, Paull D (2008) Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 107(3):1035–1047. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006
Brown LE, Goodale MA (2013) A brief review of the role of training in near-tool effects. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00576
Brown LE, Doole R, Malfait N (2011) The role of motor learning in spatial adaptation near a tool. PLoS One 6(12):e28999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028999
Burton G (1993) Non-neural extensions of haptic sensitivity. Ecol Psychol 5(2):105–124. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0502_1
Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Farnè A (2009) Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept? Brain Topogr 21(3–4):252–260. doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0092-7
Carello C, Fitzpatrick P, Turvey MT (1992) Haptic probing—perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed. Percept Psychophys 51(6):580–598. doi:10.3758/bf03211655
Cooper MM, Carello C, Turvey MT (2000) Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(1):74–85. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.74
Davoli CC, Brockmole JR (2012) The hands shield attention from visual interference. Atten Percept Psychophys 74(7):1386–1390. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0351-7
Dufour A, Touzalin P (2008) Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Exp Brain Res 190(1):91–98. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1453-2
Farnè A, Ladavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11(8):1645–1649. doi:10.1097/00001756-200006050-00010
Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43(2):238–248. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010
Farnè A, Serino A, Ladavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of pert-hand space following tool-use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 43(3):436–443. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70468-4
Forti S, Humphreys GW (2004) Visuomotor cuing through tool use in unilateral visual neglect. J Gen Psychol 131(4):379–410
Gamberini L, Seraglia B, Priftis K (2008) Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia 46(5):1298–1304. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.016
Graziano MS (1999) Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(18):10418–10421
Graziano MS, Gross CG (1993) A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 97(1):96–109
Holmes NP (2012) Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Exp Brain Res 218(2):273–282. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3042-7
Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci Lett 372(1–2):62–67. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.024
Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C (2007) Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp Brain Res 183(4):465–476. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1060-7
Klatzky RL, Lederman S, Reed C (1987) There’s more to touch than meets the eye: the salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J Exp Psychol Gen 116(4):356–369
Klatzky RL, Lederman S, Reed C (1989) Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(1):45–57. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.45
Làdavas E, Serino A (2008) Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations. Cogn Neuropsychol 25(7–8):1099–1113. doi:10.1080/02643290802359113
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(7):1439–1459. doi:10.3758/app.71.7.1439
Lloyd DM, Azanon E, Poliakoff E (2010) Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space. Brain Cogn 73(2):102–109. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.03.006
Longo MR, Lourenco SF (2006) On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 44(6):977–981. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003
Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, New York
Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8(2):79–86. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39(6):580–585. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00150-0
Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83(2):B25–B34. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00003-3
Park GD, Strom M, Reed CL (2013) To the end! Distribution of attention along a tool in peri- and extrapersonal space. Exp Brain Res 227(4):423–432. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3439-y
Previc FH (1998) The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull 124(2):123–164
Reed CL, Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1990) Haptic integration of planar size with texture, hardness, and planar contour. Can J Psychol 44(4):522–545. doi:10.1037/h0084264
Reed CL, Grubb JD, Steele C (2006) Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32(1):166–177. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.166
Reed CL, Betz R, Garza JP, Roberts RJ (2010) Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(1):236–245. doi:10.3758/app.72.1.236
Sengul A, Rognini G, van Elk M, Aspell JE, Bleuler H, Blanke O (2013) Force feedback facilitates multisensory integration during robotic tool use. Exp Brain Res 227(4):497–507. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3526-0
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the research assistant, Carlene Roberts, for her help in the data collection. We also thank Patrick A. Cabe for his helpful theoretical insights.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, G.D., Reed, C.L. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space. Exp Brain Res 233, 2977–2988 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8