Abstract
Weight illusions—where one object feels heavier than an identically weighted counterpart—have been the focus of many recent scientific investigations. The most famous of these illusions is the ‘size–weight illusion’, where a small object feels heavier than an identically weighted, but otherwise similar-looking, larger object. There are, however, a variety of similar illusions which can be induced by varying other stimulus properties, such as surface material, temperature, colour, and even shape. Despite well over 100 years of research, there is little consensus about the mechanisms underpinning these illusions. In this review, I will first provide an overview of the weight illusions that have been described. I will then outline the dominant theories that have emerged over the past decade for why we consistently misperceive the weights of objects which vary in size, with a particular focus on the role of lifters’ expectations of heaviness. Finally, I will discuss the magnitude of the various weight illusions and suggest how this largely overlooked facet of the topic might resolve some of the debates surrounding the cause of these misperceptions of heaviness.
References
Amazeen EL, Turvey M (1996) Weight perception and the haptic size–weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:213–232. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.213
Baugh LA, Kao M, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2012) Material evidence—interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. J Neurophysiol. doi:10.1152/jn.00263.2012
Brayanov JB, Smith MA (2010) Bayesian and “anti-Bayesian” biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size–weight illusion. J Neurophysiol 103:1518–1531. doi:10.1152/jn.00814.2009
Buckingham G, Goodale MA (2010a) Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion. PLoS ONE 5:e9709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009709
Buckingham G, Goodale MA (2010b) The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size–weight illusion. Exp Brain Res 205:283–288. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2353-9
Buckingham G, Goodale MA (2013) Size matters: a single representation underlies our perceptions of heaviness in the size–weight illusion. PLoS ONE 8:e54709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054709
Buckingham G, Cant JS, Goodale MA (2009) Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. J Neurophysiol 102:3111–3118. doi:10.1152/jn.00515.2009
Buckingham G, Ranger NS, Goodale MA (2011) The material–weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:36–41. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0007-4
Burgess PR, Jones LF (1997) Perceptions of effort and heaviness during fatigue and during the size–weight illusion. Somatosens Mot Res 14:189–202
Charpentier A (1891) Analyse expérimentale quelques éléments de la sensation de poids. Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques 3:122–135
Chouinard P, Large M, Chang E, Goodale M (2009) Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size–weight illusion. NeuroImage 44:200–212. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.023
Davis C, Roberts W (1976) Lifting movements in the size–weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 20:33–36
De Camp JE (1917) The influence of color on apparent weight. A preliminary study. J Exp Psychol 2:347–370. doi:10.1037/h0075903
Dijker AJM (2008) Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: the influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight. Cognition 106:1109–1125
Dresslar FB (1894) Studies in the psychology of touch. Am J Psychol 6:313–368. doi:10.2307/1411644
Ellis RR, Lederman SJ (1993) The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size–weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 53:315–324
Ellis RR, Lederman SJ (1998) The golf-ball illusion: evidence for top-down processing in weight perception. Perception 27:193–201
Ellis RR, Lederman SJ (1999) The material–weight illusion revisited. Percept Psychophys 61:1564–1576
Ernst MO (2009) Perceptual learning: inverting the size–weight illusion. Curr Biol 19:23–25. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.039
Flanagan JR, Bandomir CA (2000) Coming to grips with weight perception: effects of grasp configuration on perceived heaviness. Percept Psychophys 62:1204–1219
Flanagan JR, Beltzner MA (2000) Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion. Nat Neurosci 3:737–741. doi:10.1038/76701
Flanagan JR, Wing AM, Allison S, Spenceley A (1995) Effects of surface texture on weight perception when lifting objects with a precision grip. Percept Psychophys 57:282–290
Flanagan JR, Bittner JP, Johansson RS (2008) Experience can change distinct size–weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr Biol 18:1742–1747. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.042
Flournoy T (1894) De l’influence de la perception visuelle des corps sur leur poids apparent. Annee Psychol 1:198–200
Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Potter EK (1980) Alterations in perceived heaviness during digital anaesthesia. J Physiol 306:365–375
Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991) Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 83:477–482
Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS et al (1992) Development of human precision grip. III. Integration of visual size cues during the programming of isometric forces. Exp Brain Res 90:399–403
Grandy MS, Westwood DA (2006) Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size–weight illusion. J Neurophysiol 95:3887–3892. doi:10.1152/jn.00851.2005
Harshfield S, DeHardt D (1970) Weight judgment as a function of apparent density of objects. Psychon Sci 20:365–366
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1983) Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Exp Neurol 81:640–650
Kahrimanovic M, Bergmann Tiest W, Kappers A (2011) Characterization of the haptic shape-weight illusion with 3D objects. IEEE Trans Haptics 4:316–320. doi:10.1109/TOH.2011.22
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychon Bull Rev 8:439–453
Mon-Williams M, Murray AH (2000) The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 135:405–410
Murray DJ, Ellis RR, Bandomir CA, Ross HE (1999) Charpentier (1891) on the size–weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 61:1681–1685
Nicolas S, Ross HE, Murray DJ (2012) Charpentier’s papers of 1886 and 1891 on weight perception and the size–weight illusion. Percept Mot Skills 115:120–141
Pick HL, Pick AD (1967) A developmental and analytic study of the size–weight illusion. J Exp Child Psychol 5:362–371. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(67)90064-1
Plaisier MA, Smeets JBJ (2012) Mass is all that matters in the size–weight illusion. PLoS ONE 7:e42518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042518
Robinson HB (1964) An experimental examination of the size–weight illusion in young children. Child Dev 35:91. doi:10.2307/1126574
Ross HE (1969) When is a weight not illusory? Q J Exp Psychol 21:346–355. doi:10.1080/14640746908400230
Ross J, Di Lollo V (1970) Differences in heaviness in relation to density and weight. Percept Psychophys 7:161–162. doi:10.3758/BF03208648
Ross HE, Murray DJ, Weber EH (1978) The Sense of Touch. Academic Press, London
Schneider IK, Rutjens BT, Jostmann NB, Lakens D (2011) Weighty matters: importance literally feels heavy. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2:474–478. doi:10.1177/1948550610397895
Seashore CE (1899) Some psychological statistics II. The material weight illusion. U Iowa Stud Psychol 36–46
Stevens JC, Rubin LL (1970) Psychophysical scales of apparent heaviness and the size–weight illusion. Percept Psychophys 8:225–230. doi:10.3758/BF03210210
Walker P, Francis BJ, Walker L (2010) The brightness–weight illusion. Exp Psychol 57:462–469. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000057
Wolfe H (1898) Some effects of size on judgments of weight. Psychol Rev 5:25–54. doi:10.1037/h0073342
Zhu Q, Bingham GP (2011) Human readiness to throw: the size–weight illusion is not an illusion when picking the best objects to throw. Evol Hum Behav 32:288–293. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.005
Zhu Q, Shockley K, Riley MA et al (2013) Felt heaviness is used to perceive the affordance for throwing but rotational inertia does not affect either. Exp Brain Res 224:221–231. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3301-7
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank P. Dimitriou, L. van Eimeren, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buckingham, G. Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes. Exp Brain Res 232, 1623–1629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3926-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3926-9