Abstract
People often fail to detect changes between successively presented tactile patterns, a phenomenon known as tactile change blindness. In this study, we investigated whether changes introduced to tactile patterns are detected better when a participant’s attention is focused on the location where the change occurs. Across two experiments, participants (N = 55) were instructed to detect changes between two consecutively presented tactile patterns. In half of the trials, the stimulated body sites in the two patterns were identical. In the other half of the trials, one of the stimulated body locations differed between the two patterns. Endogenous (or voluntary) attention was manipulated by instructing participants which new bodily location was most likely to be stimulated. We found that changes at the attended location were detected more accurately than changes at bodily locations that were unattended. This finding demonstrates that attention can effectively modulate tactile change detection. We discuss the value of this experimental paradigm for investigating excessive attentional focus or hypervigilance to particular regions of the body in various clinical populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, West Sussex
Brown RJ, Brunt N, Poliakoff E, Lloyd D (2010) Illusory touch and tactile perception in somatoform dissociators. J Psychosom Res 69:241–248. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.11.010
Burton H, Abend NS, McLeod AMK, Sinclair RJ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME (1999) Tactile attention tasks enhance activations in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. Cereb Cortex 9:662–674. doi:10.1093/cercor/9.7.662
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, San Diego
Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:201–215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
Crombez G, Vervaet L, Lysens R, Baeyens F, Eelen P (1998) Avoidance and confrontation of painful, back-straining movements in chronic back pain patients. Behav Modif 22:62–77. doi:10.1177/01454455980221004
Crombez G, Van Damme S, Eccleston C (2005) Hypervigilance to pain: an experimental and clinical analysis. Pain 116:4–7. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.035
Demany L, Semal C, Pressnitzer D (2011) Implicit versus explicit frequency comparisons: two mechanisms of auditory change detection. J Exp Psychol Human 37:597–605. doi:10.1037/a0020368
Dick B, Eccleston C, Crombez G (2002) Attentional functioning in fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain patients. Arthritis Rheum 47:639–644. doi:10.1002/art.10800
Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2000) A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 3:277–283
Eiffert GH, Zvolensky MJ, Lejuez CW (2000) Heart-focused anxiety and chest pain: a conceptual and clinical review. Clin Psychol 7:403–417. doi:10.1093/clipsy/7.4.403
Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn. London, Sage Publications
Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Human 18:1030–1044. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1030
Forster B, Eimer M (2005) Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. Psychophysiology 42:171–179. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00268.x
Gallace A, Spence C (2008) The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: a multisensory perspective. Conscious Cogn 17:370–407. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.005
Gallace A, Auvray M, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006a) When visual transients impair tactile change detection. A novel case of crossmodal change blindness? Neurosci Lett 398:280–285. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.009
Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006b) The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychon B Rev 13:300–303. doi:10.3758/BF03193847
Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006c) Numerosity judgements for tactile stimuli distributed over the body surface. Perception 35:247–266. doi:10.1068/p5380
Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2007) Do “mudsplashes” induce tactile change blindness? Percept Psychophys 69:477–486. doi:10.3758/BF03193905
Glass JM (2009) Review of cognitive dysfunction in fibromyalgia: a convergence on working memory and attentional control impairments. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 35:299–311. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2009.06.002
Graziano MSA, Alisharan SE, Hu X, Gross CG (2002) The clothing effect: tactile neurons in the precentral gyrus do not respond to the touch of the familiar primate chair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11930–11933. doi:10.103/pnas.172380399
Johansen-Berg H, Lloyd DM (2000) The physiology and psychology of selective attention to touch. Front Biosci 5:d894–d904. doi:10.2741/berg
Jones SR, Pritchett DI, Stufflebeam SM, Hämäläinen M, Moore CI (2007) Neural correlates of tactile detection: a combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based computational modeling study. J Neurosci 27:10751–10764. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0482-07.2007
Karsdorp PA, Kindt M, Everaerd W, Mulder BJM (2007) Preattentive processing of heart cues and the perception of heart symptoms in congenital heart disease. Behav Res Ther 45:1893–1902. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.010
Lakatos S, Shepard RN (1997) Time-distance relations in shifting attention between locations on one’s body. Percept Psychophys 59:557–566. doi:10.3758/BF03211864
Lloyd DM, Mason L, Brown R, Poliakoff E (2008) Development of a paradigm for measuring somatic disturbance in clinical populations with medically unexplained symptoms. J Psychosom Res 64:21–24. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.004
Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:1–21. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.111.1.1
Mirams L, Poliakoff E, Brown RJ, Lloyd DM (2012) Interoceptive and exteroceptive attention have opposite effects on subsequent somatosensory perceptual decision making. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 65:926–938. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.636823
Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C (2009) Space-based, but not arm-based, shift in tactile processing in complex regional pain syndrome and its relationship to cooling of the affected limb. Brain 132:3142–3151. doi:10.1093/brain/awp224
Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C (2012a) Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspective and the concept of a cortical ‘body matrix’. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:34–46. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013
Moseley GL, Gallagher L, Gallace A (2012b) Neglect-like tactile dysfunction in chronic back pain. Neurology 79:327–332. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318260cba2
Pritchett D, Gallace A, Spence C (2011) Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm. Conscious Cogn 20:534–546. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006
Riggs KJ, Ferrand L, Lancelin D, Fryziel L, Dumur G, Simpson A (2006) Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychol Sci 17:271–272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01696.x
Sambo CF, Forster B (2011) Sustained spatial attention in touch: modality-specific and multimodal mechanisms. Sci World J 11:199–213. doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.34
Schmidt NB, Lerew DR, Trakowski JH (1997) Body vigilance in panic disorder: evaluating attention to bodily perturbations. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:214–220. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.2.214
Simons DJ, Levin DT (1997) Change blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 1:261–267. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2
Spence C, Gallace A (2007) Recent developments in the study of tactile attention. Can J Exp Psychol 61:196–207. doi:10.1037/cjep2007021
Spence C, McGlone FP (2001) Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Exp Brain Res 141:324–330. doi:10.1007/s002210100883
Spence C, Parise C (2010) Prior-entry: a review. Conscious Cogn 19:364–379. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.001
Triesch J, Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Sullivan BT (2003) What you see is what you need. J Vision 3:86–94. doi:10.1167/3.1.9
Van Damme S, Crombez G, Notebaert L (2008) Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach. Emotion 8:820–827. doi:10.1037/a0014149
Van Damme S, Legrain V, Vogt J, Crombez G (2010) Keeping pain in mind: a motivational account of attention to pain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:204–213. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.01.005
Van Laarhoven AIM, Kraaimaat FW, Wilder-Smith OH, Evers AWM (2010) Role of attentional focus on bodily sensations in sensitivity to itch and pain. Acta Dermatovenereol 90:46–51. doi:10.2340/00015555-0743
Veldhuijzen DS, Sondaal SFV, Oosterman JM (2012) Intact cognitive inhibition in patients with fibromyalgia but evidence of declined processing speed. J Pain 13:507–515. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.011
Verhoeven EWM, De Klerk S, Kraaimaat FW, Van De Kerkhof PCM, De Jong E, Evers AWM (2008) Biopsychosocial mechanisms of chronic itch in patients with skin diseases: a review. Acta Dermatovenereol 88:211–218. doi:10.2340/00015555-0452
Weinstein S (1968) Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR (ed) The skin senses. Thomas Springfield, IL, pp 195–200
Yantis S (1998) Control of visual attention. In: Pashler H (ed) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 223–256
Yates MJ, Nicholls MER (2009) Somatosensory prior entry. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:847–859. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.847
Yates MJ, Nicholls MER (2011) Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgements and simultaneity judgments. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:1586–1603. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0117-7
Acknowledgments
L. Van Hulle is funded by the Special Research Fund of Ghent University (BOF09/DOC/013). The study reported here was conducted in the context of a Bilateral Scientific Cooperation between Ghent University and the University of Oxford, funded by the Special Research Fund Ghent University (BOF10/BIP/015).
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hulle, L., Van Damme, S., Spence, C. et al. Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection. Exp Brain Res 224, 295–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3311-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3311-5