Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) is a Go-No-Go signal detection task developed to measure lapses of attention. In this study, we examined the impact that warning signals, reliable and unreliable, have on SART performance. Eighteen participants performed a no-warning, reliable-warning, or unreliable-warning SART. Response times were faster, errors of commission lower, but errors of omission higher in the reliable-warning SART in comparison with the no-warning or unreliable-warning SART. There was a significant negative correlation between participants’ errors of commission rate and their response times in the unreliable-warning and no-warning SART. This correlation was reduced in the reliable-warning SART. Making the task perceptually easier reduces the errors of commission, in contradiction to the mindlessness perspective, and reduces the speed-accuracy trade-off. These results, overall, support the view that the SART is primarily a measure of response strategy, not sustained attention per se.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken EG, Lau AW (1967) Response prompting and response confirmation: a review of recent literature. Psychol Bull 68:330–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annett K, Patterson L (1967) Training for auditory detection. Acta Psychol 27:420–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RCK (2001) A further study on the sustained attention response to task (SART): the effect of age, gender and education. Brain Inj 15:819–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RCK (2002) Attentional deficits in patients with persisting postconcussive complaints: a general deficit or specific component deficit? J Clin Exp Neuropsyc 24:1081–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne JA, Carriere JSA, Smilek D (2006) Absent-mindedness: lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Conscious Cogn 15:578–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne JA, Carriere JSA, Smilek D (2009a) Absent minds and absent agents: attention-lapse induced alienation of agency. Conscious Cogn 18:481–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne JA, Solman GJF, Carriere JSA, Smilek D (2009b) Anatomy of an error: a biderectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition 111:98–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies DR, Parasuraman R (1982) The psychology of vigilance. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockree PM, Kelly SP, Roche RA, Hogan MJ, Reilly RB, Robertson IH (2004) Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury. Cogn Brain Res 20:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA, O’Keefe FM, Moloney P, Aimola L, Cartoon S, Robertson IH (2006) Sustained attention in traumatic brain injury (tbi) and healthy controls: enhanced sensitivity with dual-task load. Exp Brain Res 168:218–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giambra LM (1995) A laboratory based method for investigating influences on switching attention to task unrelated imagery and thought. Conscious Cogn 4:1–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene CM, Bellgrove MA, Gill M, Robertson IH (2009) Noradrenergic genotype predicts lapses in sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 47:591–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grier RA, Warm JS, Dember WN, Matthews G, Galinsky TL, Szalma JL, Parasuraman R (2003) The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention not mindlessness. Hum Factors 45:349–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS (2009) Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc 31:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Warm JS (2008) Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychol 129:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Dember WN, Warms JS, Matthews G (2000) Optimism, pessimism, and false failure feedback: effects on vigilance performance. Curr Psychol 18:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Hollander TD, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN, Wallart M, Beauchamp G, Parasuraman R, Hancock PA (2005) Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. Brit J Psychol 96:249–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Kern RP, Walker DR (2009) Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task. Conscious Cogn 18:600–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Weil L, Middlemiss A, Sawers A (2010) Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the sustained attention to response task (SART). Conscious Cogn 19:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock EM, Dember WN, Warm JS, Maroney BW, See J (1999) Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention. Hum Factors 41:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KA, Kelly SP, Bellgrove MA, Barry E, Cox M, Gill M, Robertson IH (2007) Response variability in attention deficiet hyperactivity disorder: evidence for neuropsychological heterogeniety. Neuropsychologia 45:630–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth NH (1948) The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1:6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth NH (1950) Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council Special Report, No. 2680. London: H.M.S.O. (Reprinted from Selected papers in the design and use of control systems pp 174–331 by HW Sinaiko Ed., 1961, New York: Dover)

  • Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, Hawkins K (1999) The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 37:661–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manly T, Heutlink J, Davidson B, Gaynord B, Greenfield E, Parr A, Ridgeway V, Robertson IH (2004) An electronic knot in the hankerchief: content free cueing and the maintenance of attentive control. Neuropsychol Rehabil 14:89–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G, Davies DR, Westerman SJ, Stammers RB (2000) Human performance: cognition. Psychology Press, stress and individual differences. East Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell RG, Bellgrove MA, Dockree PM, Robertson IA (2006) Cognitive remediation in ADHD: effects of periodic non-contingent alerts on sustained attention to response. Neuropsychol Rehabil 16:653–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peebles D, Bothell D (2004) Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University/University of Pittsburgh pp 231–236

  • Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J (1997) “Oops!”: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35:747–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • See JE, Howe SR, Warm JS, Dember WN (1995) A meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychol Bull 117:230–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood J, Baracaia SF, Lowe M, Obonsawin MC (2003) Task-unrelated-thought whilst encoding information. Conscious Cogn 12:452–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood J, Davies JB, Heim D, Finnigan F, Sudberry M, O’Conner R, Obonsawin M (2004) Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Conscious Cogn 13:657–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Temple JG, Warm JS, Dember WN, Jones KS, LaGrange CM, Matthews G (2000) The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Hum Factors 42:183–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turatto M, Galfano G (2000) Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Res 40:1639–1643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warm JS (1984) An introduction to vigilance. In: Warm JS (ed) Sustained attention in human performance. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Warm JS (1993) Vigilance and target detection. In: Huey BM, Wickens CD (eds) Workload transitions: implications for individual and team performance. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Warm JS, Parasuraman R, Matthews G (2008) Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum Factors 50:433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner EL, Attwood DA (1968) Training for vigilance: combined cueing and knowledge of results. J Appl Psychol 52:474–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman DH, Roberts KC, Visscher KM, Woldorff MG (2004) The neural bases of momentary lapses of attention. Nat Neurosci 9:971–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

    William S. Helton, James Head & Paul N. Russell

Authors
  1. William S. Helton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Head
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul N. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Helton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helton, W.S., Head, J. & Russell, P.N. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task. Exp Brain Res 209, 401–407 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2563-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2563-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation