Skip to main content
Log in

Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When formulating an estimate of event time, the human sensory system has been shown to possess a degree of perceptual flexibility. Specifically, the perceived relative timing of auditory and visual stimuli is, to some extent, a product of recent experience. It has been suggested that this form of sensory recalibration may be peculiar to the audiovisual domain. Here we investigate how adaptation to sensory asynchrony influences the perceived temporal order of audiovisual, audiotactile and visuotactile stimulus pairs. Our data show that a brief period of repeated exposure to asynchrony in any of these sensory pairings results in marked changes in subsequent temporal order judgments: the point of perceived simultaneity shifts toward the level of adaptation asynchrony. We find that the size and nature of this shift is very similar in all three pairings and that sensitivity to asynchrony is unaffected by the adaptation process. In light of these findings we suggest that a single supramodal mechanism may be responsible for the observed recalibration of multisensory perceived time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold DH, Johnston A, Nishida S (2005) Timing sight and sound. Vis Res 45:1275–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behar I, Bevan W (1961) The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: cross-modal comparison and interaction. Am J Psychol 74:17–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst MO (2007) Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. J Vis 7:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fain GL (2003) Sensory transduction. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki W, Shimojo S, Kashino M, Nishida S (2004) Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat Neurosci 7:773–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrar V, Harris LR (2005) Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision. Exp Brain Res 166:465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson H (1964) Adaptation-level theory. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron J, Whitaker D, McGraw PV, Horoshenkov KV (2007) Adaptation minimizes distance-related audiovisual delays. J Vis 7:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keetels M, Vroomen J (2007) No effect of auditory–visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration. Exp Brain Res 182:559–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopinska A, Harris LR (2004) Simultaneity constancy. Perception 33:1049–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J, Guski R (2004) Auditory–visual temporal integration as a function of distance: no compensation for sound-transmission time in human perception. Neurosci Lett 357:119–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mamassian P, Landy M, Maloney LT (2002) Bayesian modelling of visual perception. In: Rao RPN, Olshausen BA, Lewicki MS (eds) Probabilistic models of the brain: perception and neural function. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki M, Yamamoto S, Uchida S, Kitazawa S (2006) Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nat Neurosci 9:875–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2007) Adaptation to audiotactile asynchrony. Neurosci Lett 413:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesavento MJ, Schlag J (2006) Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity. Exp Brain Res 174:435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stetson C, Cui X, Montague PR, Eagleman DM (2006) Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 51:651–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker AA, Simoncelli EP (2005) Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. In: Weiss Y, Scholkopf B, Platt J (eds) Neural information processing systems (NIPS), vol 18. MIT Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugita Y, Suzuki Y (2003) Audiovisual perception—implicit estimation of sound-arrival time. Nature 421:911–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MM, Creelman CD (1967) PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 41:782–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroomen J, Keetels M, de Gelder B, Bertelson P (2004) Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio–visual asynchrony. Cogn Brain Res 22:32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini M, Brown T, Shore DI, Maravita A, Roder B, Spence C (2005) Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Psychol 118:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

D.W. was supported by a Research Fellowship from The Leverhulme Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James V. M. Hanson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanson, J.V.M., Heron, J. & Whitaker, D. Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities. Exp Brain Res 185, 347–352 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1282-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1282-3

Keywords

Navigation