Skip to main content
Log in

Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the neural bases of prehension have been extensively studied in monkeys, a few kinematic studies have examined their prehension behavior. Recently (Roy et al. 2000, 2002), we have described the kinematics of reaching and grasping in freely behaving monkeys under normal conditions by applying the high-resolution recording techniques (Optotrak® system) and behavioral paradigms used in humans. Here we determined whether online movement reorganization observed in monkeys following sudden changes of either object size or location at movement onset is similar to that observed in humans. We found that changing object size led to rapid on-flight re-calibration of the different movement parameters, eventually preserving the unitary aspect of the movement with a minor time cost. By contrast, a shift in object location triggered a massive time-consuming reorganization. Re-directed movements appeared as a concatenation of two sub-movements: a first one directed to the initial object and a second one directed to the new object location. These findings first complement our earlier studies in providing further evidence of the similarities between monkey and human prehension. Second, they suggest that the two components of prehension, reaching and grasping, interact through coordination mechanisms that are more efficient to correct for size than for location perturbation. This difference may reflect a hierarchical organization in which reaching would be the subordinate of grasping in both primate species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battaglini PP, Muzur A, Galletti C, Skrap M, Brovelli A, Fattori P (2002) Effects of lesions to area V6A in monkeys. Exp Brain Res 144:419–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey D, Otto de Haart EG (2001) Hemispatial differences in visually guided aiming are neither hemispatial nor visual. Neuropsychologia 39:885–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan H, Goodale MA, Marteniuk RG (1993) Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback. Hum Mov Sci 12:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Paulignan Y (1992) Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching. Behav Brain Res 50:7–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Stelmach GE (1993) Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size. Exp Brain Res 94:163–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrowski A, Bock O, Carnahan H, Jungling S (2002) The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 145:365–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fattori P, Breveglieri R, Amoroso K, Galletti C (2004) Evidence for both reaching and grasping activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex of the macaque. Eur J Neurosci 20:2457–2466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galletti C, Gamberini M, Kutz DF, Fattori P, Luppino G, Matelli M (2001) The cortical connections of area V6: an occipito-parietal network processing visual information. Eur J Neurosci 13:1572–1588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galletti C, Kutz DF, Gamberini M, Breveglieri R, Fattori P (2003) Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 153:158–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U (1992) Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res 47:71–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Gilhardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99:112–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1991) Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension. Neurosci Lett 122: 103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1995) Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension. Exp Brain Res 102:483–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale NJ, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Biguer B (1982) Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonal space. In: Ingle D, Goodale MA, Mansfield R (eds) Advances in the analysis of visual behavior, MIT Press, Boston, pp 387–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason CR, Theverapperuma LS, Hendrix CM, Ebner TJ (2004) Monkey hand postural synergies during reach-to-grasp in the absence of vision of the hand and object. J Neurophysiol 91:2826–2837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matelli M, Govoni P, Galletti C, Kutz DF, Luppino G (1998) Superior area 6 afferents from the superior parietal lobule in themacaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 402:327–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Farné A, Jouffrais C, Boussaoud D (2000) Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey. Behav Brain Res 117:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Meunier M, Boussaoud D (2002) Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of object size and location. J Neurophysiol 88:1491–1499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shipp S, Blanton M, Zeki SA (1998) Visuo-somatomotor pathway through superior parietal cortex in the macaque monkey: cortical connections of areas V6 and V6A. Eur J Neurosci 10:3171–3193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanné J, Boussaoud D, Boyer-Zeller N, Rouiller EM (1995) Direct visual pathways for reaching movements in the macaque monkey. Neuroreport 7:267–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanné-Gariepy J, Rouiller EM, Boussaoud D (2002) Parietal inputs to dorsal versus ventral premotor areas in the macaque monkey: evidence for largely segregated visuomotor pathways. Exp Brain Res 145:91–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank A. Farné for helpful comments on the manuscript; M. Thevenet, B. Messaoudi, B. Bertrand and C. Etienne for technical assistance; and JL Charieau for animal care. This work was supported by CNRS and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1. ACR was supported by the Ministère de l’Education Nationale (France) and by the Bettencourt-Shueller foundation (Paris).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Driss Boussaoud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, A.C., Paulignan, Y., Meunier, M. et al. Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location. Exp Brain Res 169, 182–193 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0133-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0133-8

Keywords

Navigation