Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in the quality of fishburger produced from Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during frozen storage (−18 °C)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the chemical and sensory qualities of fishburger produced from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) were investigated during frozen storage (−18 °C) over 8 months. The ratios of crude protein, lipid, moisture, crude ash, and polyunsaturated fatty acids in tilapiaburger were found to be 17.82%, 5.29%, 66.68%, 2.56% and 7.95% respectively. At the end of the study, the total volatile basic nitrogen value was found to have fluctuated throughout the storage periods. The highest thiobarbituric acid value was found at the 7th month as 0.142 mg malonaldehyde/kg. The peroxide value was 0.18 meq/kg at the beginning of the storage but increased to 5.03 meq/kg at 6th month of storage and then decreased to 0.82 meq/kg at the 8th month. The level of free fatty acids was 2.73% oleic acid at the beginning but reached 4.14% in the first month of storage and then increased to 5.92% at the end of the storage. pH values ranged between 8.01 and 7.97. At the end of the storage period, sensory quality criteria were scored as quite near those of the fresh samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hudges DA (1995) Nutr Food Sci 95:12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Horrocks LA, Yeo YK (1999) Pharmacol Res 40:211–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sidhu KS (2003) Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol 38:336–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Onibala H, Takayama T, Shindo J, Hayashi S, Miki H (1997) Fish Sci 63:276–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kongpun O (1999) Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 33:258:269

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohsin Md, Bakar J, Selamat J (1999) Int J Food Sci Technol 34:359–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alcesto C, Jory D (2003) Aquaculture Mag July/August 1–2

  8. Matsumuto JJ (1979) ACS Symp Ser 180, Washington

  9. Matsumuto JJ (1980) In: JR Whitaker JR, Fujimaki M (eds) Am Chem Soc Washington D.C., p 205

  10. Shenouda, SYK (1980) Flesh Adv Food Res 26:275–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grosch W (1987) Reactions of hydroperoxides - products of low molecular weight. In: Chan HWS (ed) Autoxidation of unsaturated lipids. Academic, London, pp 95–139

  12. Anderson UB, Steinhold K (1992) Norw J Agric 6:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sylvia G, Morrissey MT, Graham T, Garcia S (1995) J Aquat Food Prod Technol 4:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander A (1980) Food Flavouring Ingredient Packaging Processing 11:42

    Google Scholar 

  15. El-Sanafery N Y, Sorour AE, Ibrahim H M (1988) Grasas Aceites 39:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu S Y, Siah W M (1996) INFOFISH Int 2:34–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J (1997) Agric Chem Biotechnol 40:318–322

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taşkaya L (1998) MSc Thesis p 107

  19. Metin S, Erkan N, Varlik C (2002) Turkish J Vet Anim Sci 26:363–367

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolakowski E, Lachowicz K, Kolakowska A, Seidler T, Frydryszewski J, Plawski A, Szolomicka K, Wysocka E (1984) Przem Spozyw 38:219–221, 201–202

    Google Scholar 

  21. Declerck D, Vyncke W (1984) Rev Agric 37:1087–1092

    Google Scholar 

  22. AOAC (1984) Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th edn. AOAC, Washington D.C.

  23. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) Can J Bochem Physiol 37:911–917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Antonocopoulos N (1973) In: Ludorf W Meyer V (ed) Fische und Fischerzeugnisse Berlin und Hamburg, pp 224–225

  25. Tarladgis B, Watts BM, Yonathan M (1960) J Am Oil Chem Soc 37:44–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. AOAC (1994) The American Oil Chemists Society Champaign, Ill.

  27. Morrison WR, Smith LM (1964) J Lipid Res 5:600–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Paulus K, Zacharias R, Robinson L, Geidel H (1979) Lebensm Wiss Technol12: 52–61

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez-Estrada MT, Penazzi G, Caboni MF, Bertacco G Lercker G (1997) Meat Sci 45:365–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. EU directive79/112/EEC (1979)http://biosafetyihebe/GB/FF/79_112?79_112.html

  31. Clucas IJ (1982) In: Fish Handling, Preservation and Processing Part 2,pp 4–8

  32. Siddaiah D, Reddy GVS, Raju CV, Chandrasekhar TC, (2001) Food Research Int 34:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reddy VS, Srikar G, Khuntia BK, Kumar N (1995) J Food Sci Technol 32:315–319

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Kahtani HA, Abu-Tarboush HM, Bajaber AD, Atia M, Abou-Arab, AA, Mojadidi M (1996) J Food Sci 61:729–733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ben-gigirey B, De Sousa JMVB, Villa TG, Barros-velazquez J (1999) J Food Sci 64: 20–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Webb NB, Hardy ER, Giddings GG, Howell AJ (1976) J Food Sci 41:1277–1281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mai J, Kinsella JE (1980) J Food Biochem 3:229–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark TH, Faustmen C, Chan WKM, Furr HC, Reisen JW (1999) J Food Sci 64: 982–986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cho SY, Endo Y, Fujimoto K, Kaneda T (1989) Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 55:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  40. Auborg SP (1999) Food Res Int 32:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Auborg SP, Carmen MR, Sotelo G (1999) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 208:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hardy R (1980) In: JJ Connell (ed) Fishing News Book Ltd Farnham Surrey England pp103–111

  43. Verma JK, Srikar LN, Sudhakara NS, Sarma J (1995) Food Res Int 28:87–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Brake NC, Fennema OR (1999) J Food Sci 64:25–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haard NF In:EG Bligh (ed) Fishing News Books, Oxford UK pp 176–209

  46. Undeland I, Lingnert H (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:2075–2081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Research Fund of Çukurova University for financial support of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Fisheries, Çukurova University, 01330, Adana, Turkey

    Abdurrahman Polat, Gülsün Beklevik & Serhat Özkütük

  2. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department Of Seafood Søltofts Plads, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

    Bahar Tokur

Authors
  1. Bahar Tokur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdurrahman Polat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gülsün Beklevik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Serhat Özkütük
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Tokur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tokur, B., Polat, A., Beklevik, G. et al. Changes in the quality of fishburger produced from Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during frozen storage (−18 °C). Eur Food Res Technol 218, 420–423 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-0879-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-0879-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation