Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial lateral flow devices for rapid detection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana) cross-contamination in the industrial production of cookies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are qualitative immunochromatographic tests for the rapid and specific detection of target analytes. We investigated commercially available LFDs for their ability to detect potentially allergenic peanut and hazelnut in raw cookie dough and chocolate, two important food matrices in the industrial production of cookies. Each three commercial LFDs for the detection of hazelnut and peanut were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. All LFDs had comparably satisfactory specificity that was investigated with a variety of characteristic foods and food ingredients used in the production of cookies. In concordance with hazelnut-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), walnut was the most cross-reactive food for hazelnut-specific LFD. The sensitivity was verified in raw cookie doughs and chocolates that were either spiked with peanut or hazelnut between 1 and 25 mg/kg, respectively. Two hazelnut-specific LFDs detected hazelnut at a level of 3.5 mg/kg in both matrices, whereas the third LFD detected hazelnut at a level of 3.9 mg/kg in dough and 12.5 mg/kg in chocolate. Two peanut-specific LFDs detected peanut at a level of 1 mg/kg in both matrices. The third LFD detected peanut at a level of 14.2 mg/kg in chocolate and 4 mg/kg in dough. In conclusion, specific and sensitive LFD were identified for each hazelnut and peanut, having a level of sensitivity that is comparable to commercial ELISA for the investigated matrices. Such sensitive, specific, and rapid tests are useful analytical tools for allergen screening and sanitation in the industrial manufacture of foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LFD:

lateral flow device

LOD:

limit of detection

LOQ:

limit of quantification

nd:

not done

References

  1. Sampson HA (1999) J Allergy Clin Immunol 103:717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sampson HA (1990) Curr Opinion Immunol 2:542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C et al (2007) J Allergy Clin Immunol 120:638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pastorello EA, Rivolta F, Bianchi M et al (2001) J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 756:11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pumphrey RS, Stanworth SJ (1996) Clin Exp Allergy 26:1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pumphrey RS, Gowland MH (2007) J Allergy Clin Immunol 119:1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bock SA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA (2007) J Allergy Clin Immunol 119:1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sicherer SH, Burks AW, Munoz-Furlong A et al (1999) J Allergy Clin Immunol 103:559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Groot H, Jong NW, Vuijk MH et al (1996) Allergy 51(10):712

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koppelman S (2006) In: Koppelman S, Hefle S (eds) Detecting allergens in food, edn 1. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 201–218

  11. Tariq SM, Stevens M, Matthews S et al (1996) BMJ 313:514

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wensing M, Penninks AH, Hefle SL et al (2002) J Allergy Clin Immunol 110:915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wensing M, Penninks AH, Hefle SL et al (2002) Clin Exp Allergy 32:1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bock S, Muñoz-Furlong A, Sampson H (2001) J Allergy Clin Immunol 107:191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA (2006) J Allergy Clin Immunol 117:470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sampson HA (2004) J Allergy Clin Immunol 113:805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2004) Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA)

  18. COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2007/68/EC of 27 November 2007 amending Annex IIIa to Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain food ingredients. Official Journal of the European Union L 310/11

  19. Röder M, Ibach A, Baltruweit I et al (2008) J Food Prot 71:2263

    Google Scholar 

  20. Furlong TJ, DeSimone J, Sicherer SH (2001) J Allergy Clin Immunol 108:867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boden M, Dadswell R, Hattersley S (2005) Proc Nutr Soc 64:475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hefle S, Furlong T, Niemann L et al (2007) J Allergy Clin Immunol 120:171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Blok BMJ, Dubois AEJ, Hourihane J O`B (2007) In: Mills C, Wichers H, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K (eds) Managing allergens in food. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 3–28

  24. Holzhauser T, Vieths S (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holzhauser T, Vieths S (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:4209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephan O, Vieths S (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:3754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vieths S, Holzhauser T, Erdmann S et al (2006) Allergo J 2:114

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Hengel AJ, Capelletti C, Brohee M et al (2006) J AOAC Int 89:462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. W. Weber from ifp, Institut für Produktqualität GmbH, Berlin, and Dr. S. Haas-Lauterbach from R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, for kindly providing the commercial LFD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Holzhauser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röder, M., Vieths, S. & Holzhauser, T. Commercial lateral flow devices for rapid detection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana) cross-contamination in the industrial production of cookies. Anal Bioanal Chem 395, 103–109 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2716-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2716-x

Keywords

Navigation