Skip to main content
Log in

Cocaine self-administration on a hold-down schedule of reinforcement in rats

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale and objective

Although many contingencies operating in the natural environment include continuous dimensions of responses and reinforcers, previous studies of drug self-administration have almost exclusively used discrete dimensions of responses (e.g., a lever press) and reinforcers (e.g., 1.0 mg/kg/injection cocaine). Therefore, the present study provides an initial examination under experimental conditions with both responses and reinforcers measured along continuous dimensions.

Materials and methods

Cocaine-maintained responding was studied in rats under a novel, hold-down schedule of reinforcement wherein the duration of the response was directly related to the magnitude of the reinforcer. These conditions were established by activating the syringe pump when the lever was pressed down and turning the pump off when the lever was released. The concentration of cocaine available in the syringe was varied across sessions.

Results

Cocaine self-administration was readily maintained under these conditions and remained stable across sessions. Responding was concentration dependent, with the number of responses and total duration of the response inversely related to concentration, and overall session intake of cocaine was stable across concentrations. In general, the duration of the responses were less than 0.5 s and did not vary as a function of concentration.

Conclusions

Stability of responding under these schedule conditions was acquired quickly. This schedule of reinforcement may be useful for comparing across drug classes, can be extended for use with other types of responses and reinforcers, and may be more representative of the natural world where response-reinforcer contingencies are more likely to be experienced along continuous, rather than discrete, dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FR:

fixed ratio

PR:

progressive ratio

References

  • Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1998) Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner TG, Balster RL (1978) Choice behavior in rhesus monkeys: cocaine versus food. Science 201:534–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KG, Velkey AJ, Woolverton WL (2002) The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacol 163:319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JM, Roberts DCS (1997) A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:441–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME (2000) Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacol 153:44–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll ME, Lac ST (1997) Acquisition of IV amphetamine and cocaine self-administration in rats as a function of dose. Psychopharmacol 129:206–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Covington HE 3rd, Miczek KA (2001) Repeated social-defeat stress, cocaine or morphine. Effects on behavioral sensitization and intravenous cocaine self-administration “binges”. Psychopharmacol 158:388–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Layng MP, Badger G (1993) Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav 60:641–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deroche-Gamonet V, Belin D, Piazza PV (2004) Evidence for addiction-like behavior in the rat. Science 305:1014–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman DA, Hienz RD, Stern S, Kowlowitz V (1980) Shaping the location of a pigeon’s peck: effect of rate and size of shaping steps. J Exp Anal Behav 33:299–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galbicka G (1988) Differentiating the behavior of organisms. J Exp Anal Behav 50:343–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasior M, Bergman J, Kallman MJ, Paronis CA (2005) Evaluation of the reinforcing effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors under a concurrent schedule of food and i.v. drug delivery in rhesus monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacol 30:758–764

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber GJ, Wise RA (1989) Pharmacological regulation of intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats: a variable dose paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:527–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Brady JV, Bradford LD (1979) Predicting the abuse liability of drugs with animal drug self-administration procedures: psychomotor stimulants and hallucinogens. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol. 2. New York, Academic, pp 163–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove RN, Schuster CR (1974) Suppression of cocaine self-administration by extinction and punishment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick RM (1964) The successive differentiation of a lever displacement response. J Exp Anal Behav 7:211–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1975) A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193:676–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2006) Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves. J Exp Anal Beh 85:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz JL (1990) Models of relative reinforcing efficacy and their predictive utility. Behav Pharmacol 1:283–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn ME, Iglauer C, Woods JH (1976) Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 25:81–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch WJ, LaBounty LP, Carroll ME (1998) A novel paradigm to investigate regulation of drug intake in rats self-administering cocaine or heroin intravenously. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 6:22–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Smethells JR, Ewan EE, Hursh SR (2007) Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes. J Exp Anal Behav 87:219–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meisch RA (2000) Relative persistence of behavior: a fundamental measure of relative reinforcing effects. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:333–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millenson JR, Hurwitz HMB, Nixon WLB (1961) Influence of reinforcement schedules on response duration. J Exp Anal Behav 4:243–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nader MA, Woolverton WL (1991) Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology 105:169–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS (2003) Rapid assessment of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys: effects of environmental manipulations and treatment with d-amphetamine and flupenthixol. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:919–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS (2005) Effects of punishment on choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacol 181:244–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Notterman JM, Mintz DE (1962) Exteroceptive cueing of response force. Science 135:1070–1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panlilio LV, Thorndike EB, Schindler CW (2006) Cocaine self-administration under variable-dose schedules in squirrel monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 84:235–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panlilio LV, Thorndike EB, Schindler CW (2007) A stimulus-control account of regulated drug intake in rats. Psychopharmacol 196:441–450 doi:10.1007/s00213-007-0978-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit HO, Justice JB (1989) Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during cocaine self administration as studied by in vivo microdialysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:899–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens R, Thompson T (1968) Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 161:122–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DCS, Goeders NE (1989) Drug self-administration: experimental methods and determinants. In: Boulton AA, Baker GB, Greenshaw AJ (eds) Neuromethods: psychopharmacology. Humana, Clifton, pp 349–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Rodefer JS, Spealman RD (2002) Self-administration of cocaine, alfentanil, and nalbuphine under progressive-ratio schedules: consumer demand and labor supply analyses of relative reinforcing effectiveness. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 10:367–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjoldager P, Fowler SC (1988) Effects of pimozide, across doses and within sessions, on discriminated lever release performance in rats. Psychopharmacol 96:21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford D, LeSage MG, Glowa JR (1998) Progressive-ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self-administration: a review. Psychopharmacol 139:169–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsibulsky VL, Norman AB (1999) Satiety threshold: a quantitative model of maintained cocaine self-administration. Brain Res 839:85–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Galuska T, Winger G, Woods JH (2007) A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacol 194:563–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward SJ, Morgan D, Roberts DC (2005) Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combination under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:286–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DC, Johnston JM (1992) Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: an integrative analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 58:205–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MC, Hitmoi M, Schuster CR (1971) Psychomotor stimulant self administration as a function of dosage per injection in rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacologia 22:271–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, Woods JH (2006) Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine, remifentanil, and their combination in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Ther 381:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Newton P, Leeb K, Burnette B, Pocock D, Justice JB Jr (1995) Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmarcology 120:10–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokel RA, Pickens R (1974) Drug level of d- and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration. Psychopharmacologia 34:255–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zittel-Lazarini A, Cador M, Ahmed SH (2007) A critical transition in cocaine self-administration: behavioral and neurobiological implications. Psychopharmacol 192:337–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drake Morgan.

Additional information

Drake Morgan and Yu Liu contributed equally to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, D., Liu, Y., Oleson, E.B. et al. Cocaine self-administration on a hold-down schedule of reinforcement in rats. Psychopharmacology 201, 601–609 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1328-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1328-z

Keywords

Navigation