Skip to main content
Log in

Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating

II. Temporal, pharmacologic and generational analyses of apomorphine effects on prepulse inhibition

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

The disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle in rats by dopamine agonists has been used in a predictive model for antipsychotics, and more recently, to study the neural basis of strain differences in dopaminergic function. We have previously reported that Sprague-Dawley (SDH) and Long Evans (LEH) rats differed in their sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine (APO) in two distinct ways: 1) compared to LEH rats, SDH rats were more sensitive to the ability of APO to disrupt PPI with relatively long prepulse intervals (60–120 ms), and 2) APO enhanced PPI in LEH rats with 10–30 ms prepulse intervals, but this effect was limited to 10 ms prepulse intervals in SDH rats.

Methods

In the present study, we replicated this temporal profile in SDH versus LEH rats, assessed the role of D1 versus D2 substrates in the two components of this strain difference, and assessed the heritability of these temporally distinct processes.

Results

Pharmacologic studies revealed that: 1) D2 blockade prevented the long interval PPI-disruptive effects of APO in both strains, and extended the temporal range of the PPI-enhancing effects of APO from 10 to 30 ms in SDH rats, and 2) D1 blockade increased PPI and blocked the PPI-enhancing effects of APO at short intervals in both strains. Generational studies in adult F0 (SDH and LEH), F1 (SDHxLEH) and N2 (SDHxF1) rats demonstrated that sensitivity to APO of both short and long interval PPI were inherited in a manner suggestive of relatively simple additive effects of multiple genes.

Conclusions

The present findings demonstrate that inherited differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating are manifested not only in quantitative shifts (more versus less), but also in qualitative shifts in the temporal properties of sensorimotor gating that appear to be under separate control of D1 and D2 substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abduljawad KAJ, Langley RW, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1997) Evidence for involvement of D2 dopamine receptors in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in man. Psychopharmacology 11:69

    Google Scholar 

  • Amicarelli F, Gasbarri A, Masciocco L, Pompili A, Pacitti C, Carlucci G, Palumbo G, Miranda M (1999) The effect of intrastriatal injection of liposome-entrapped tyrosinase on the dopamine levels in the rat brain. Cell Mol Biol 45:1093–1097

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Freedman R (2002) The importance of endophenotypes in studies of the genetics of schizophrenia. In: Davis KL, Charney D, Coyle JT, Nemeroff C (eds) Neuropsychopharmacology: the fifth generation of progress. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 703–716

  • Braff DL, Stone C, Callaway E, Geyer MA, Glick ID, Bali L (1978) Prestimulus effects on human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics. Psychophysiology 15: 339–343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Geyer MA, Swerdlow NR (2001) Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology 156:234–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buzsaki G, Smith A, Berger S, Fisher LJ, Gage FH (1990) Petit mal epilepsy and parkinsonian tremor: hypothesis of a common pacemaker. Neuroscience 36:1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter RJ, Lione LA, Humby T et al. (1999) Characterization of progressive motor deficits in mice transgenic for the human Huntington's disease mutation. J Neurosci 19:3248–3257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin NMWJ, van Luijtelaar ELJM, Jansen SJ, Cools AR, Ellenbroek BA (2000) Dopamine characteristics in different rat genotypes: the relation to absence epilepsy. Neurosci Res 38:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin NM, van Luijtelaar EL, Cools AR, Ellenbroek BA (2001) Auditory information processing in rat genotypes with different dopaminergic properties. Psychopharmacology 156:352–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer MA, Swerdlow NR (1998) Measurement of startle response, prepulse inhibition, and habituation. In: Crawley JN, Skolnick P (eds) current protocols in neuroscience. Wiley, New York, pp 8.7.1–8.7.15

  • Geyer MA, Krebs-Thomson K, Braff DL, Swerdlow NR (2001) Pharmacological studies of prepulse inhibition models of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia: a decade in review. Psychopharmacology 156:117–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham F (1975) The more or less startling effects of weak prestimuli. Psychophysiology 12:238–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grillon C, Ameli R, Charney DS, Krystal J, Braff DL (1992) Startle gating deficits occur across prepulse intensities in schizophrenic patients. Biol Psychiatry 32:939–943

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison KE, Swift R (1999) Effect of d-amphetamine on prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in humans. Psychopharmacology 156:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney GG, Wilkinson LO, Saywell KL, Tricklebank MD (1999) Rat strain differences in ability to disrupt sensorimotor gating are limited to the dopaminergic system, specific to prepulse inhibition, and unrelated to changes in startle amplitude or nucleus accumbens dopamine receptor sensitivity. J Neurosci 19:5644–5653

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari V, Soni W, Sharma T (1999) Normalization of information processing deficits in schizophrenia with clozapine. Am J Psychiatry 156:1046–1051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach RS, Geyer MA, Braff DL (1988) Dopaminergic stimulation disrupts sensorimotor gating in the rat. Psychopharmacology 94:507–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Else D (2000) PHNO, a selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist, does not reduce prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in rats. Psychopharmacology 151:38–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meloni EG, Davis M (1999) Enhancement of the acoustic startle response in rats by the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 82958. Psychopharmacology 144:373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AA, Dulawa SC, Mottiwala AA, Conti LH, Geyer MA, Printz MP (2000) Prepulse startle deficit in the Brown Norway rat: a potential genetic model. Behav Neurosci 114:374–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peng RY, Mansbach RS, Braff DL, Geyer MA (1991) A D2 dopamine receptor agonist disrupts sensorimotor gating in rats. Implications for dopaminergic abnormalities in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 3:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon G (1990) Differential effects of apomorphine on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex in two rat strains. Psychopharmacology 102:419–421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searle AG (1990) Comparative genetics of albinism. Ophth Paediatr Genet 11:159–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR (1996) Cortico-striatal substrates of cognitive, motor and sensory gating: speculations and implications for psychological function and dysfunction. In: Panksepp L (ed) Advances in biological psychiatry (vol 2). JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., pp 179–208

  • Swerdlow NR, Geyer MA, Braff DL, Koob GF (1986) Central dopamine hyperactivity in rats mimics abnormal acoustic startle in schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 21:23–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Braff DL, Taaid N, Geyer MA (1994) Assessing the validity of an animal model of deficient sensorimotor gating in schizophrenic patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 51:139–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Braff DL, Geyer MA (2000a) Animal models of deficient sensorimotor gating: what we know, what we think we know, and what we hope to know soon. Behav Pharmacol 11:185–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Martinez ZA, Hanlon FM, Platten A, Farid M, Auerbach P, Braff DL, Geyer MA (2000b) Toward understanding the biology of a complex phenotype: rat strain and substrain differences in the sensorimotor gating-disruptive effects of dopamine agonists. J Neurosci 20:4325–4336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Platten A, Shoemaker J, Pitcher L, Auerbach PP (2001a) Effects of pergolide on sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex in rats. Psychopharmacology 158:230–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Platten A, Kim YK, Gaudet I, Shoemaker J, Pitcher L, Auerbach P (2001b) Sensitivity to the dopaminergic regulation of prepulse inhibition in rats: evidence for genetic, but not environmental determinants. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70:219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Shoemaker JM, Pitcher L, Platten A, Kuczenski R, Eeley CC, Auerbach P (2002) Genetic differences in startle gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine: evidence for central mediation. Behav Neurosci 116:682–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Platten A, Hanlon FM, Martinez ZA, Printz MP, Auerbach P (2003a) Sensitivity to sensorimotor gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine in two outbred parental rat strains and their F1 and N2 progeny. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow NR, Shoemaker JM, Auerbach PP, Pitcher L, Goins J, Platten A (2003b) Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating. I. Apomorphine effects on startle gating in albino and hooded outbred rat strains and their F1 and N2 progeny. Psychopharmacology DOI 10.1007/s00213-003-1481-3

  • Tief K, Schmidt A, Beermann F (1998) New evidence for presence of tyrosinase in substantia nigra, forebrain and midbrain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 53:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wan FJ, Taaid N, Swerdlow NR (1996) Do D1/D2 interactions regulate prepulse inhibition in rats? Neuropsychopharmacology 14:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Weike AI, Bauer U, Hamm AO (2000) Effective neuroleptic medication removes prepulse inhibition deficits in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 47:61–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health awards MH58384, MH01436 & MH42228. The authors are grateful for the assistance of Ms. Sarah Crain in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neal R. Swerdlow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swerdlow, N.R., Shoemaker, J.M., Auerbach, P.P. et al. Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating. Psychopharmacology 174, 452–462 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1480-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1480-4

Keywords

Navigation