Abstract
Recently N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) has been identified to guide the interaction of RNA-binding protein hnRNP C and their target RNAs, which is termed as m6A-switches. We systematically investigated the association between genetic variants in m6A-switches and bladder cancer risk. A two-stage case–control study was performed to systematically calculate the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 2798 m6A-switches with bladder cancer risk in 3,997 subjects. A logistic regression model was used to assess the effects of SNPs on bladder cancer risk. A series of experiments were adopted to explore the role of genetic variants of m6A-switches. We identified that rs5746136 (G > A) of SOD2 in m6A-switches was significantly associated with the reduced risk of bladder cancer (additive model in discovery stage: OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93, P = 3.6 × 10−3; validation stage: adjusted OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99, P = 3.0 × 10−2; combined analysis: adjusted OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.93, P = 4.0 × 10−4). The mRNA level of SOD2 was remarkably lower in bladder cancer tissues than the paired adjacent samples. SNP rs5746136 may affect m6A modification and regulate SOD2 expression by guiding the binding of hnRNP C to SOD2, which played a critical tumor suppressor role in bladder cancer cells by promoting cell apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation, migration and invasion. In conclusion, our findings suggest the important role of genetic variants in m6A modification. SOD2 polymorphisms may influence the expression of SOD2 via an m6A-hnRNP C-dependent mechanism and be promising predictors of bladder cancer risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SNP:
-
Single nucleotide polymorphism
- GWAS:
-
Genome-wide association study
- m6A:
-
N6-Methyladenosine
- RBP:
-
RNA-binding proteins
- MAF:
-
Minor allele frequency
- HWE:
-
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
- LD:
-
Linkage disequilibrium
- qRT-PCR:
-
Quantitative real-time PCR
- TCGA:
-
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- GEO:
-
Gene Expression Omnibus
- GEPIA:
-
Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis
- GTEx:
-
Genotype-Tissue Expression
- ORF:
-
Open reading frame
- RIPA:
-
Radio immunoprecipitation assay
- PMSF:
-
Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride
- PVDF:
-
Polyvinylidene fluoride
- CCK8:
-
Cell Counting Kit 8
- DAA:
-
3-Deazaadenosine
- RIP:
-
RNA immunoprecipitation
- meRIP:
-
Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- eQTL:
-
Expression quantitative trait locus
- dbGaP:
-
Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes
References
Bond GL, Hu W, Bond EE et al (2004) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell 119(5):591–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.022
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018 GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G et al (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. EurUrol 63(2):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
Chen M, Wei L, Law CT et al (2017) RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase METTL3 promotes liver cancer progression through YTHDF2 dependent post-transcriptional silencing of SOCS2. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29683
Chen YT, Shen JY, Chen DP et al (2020) Identification of cross-talk between m(6)A and 5mC regulators associated with onco-immunogenic features and prognosis across 33 cancer types. J HematolOncol 13(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00854-w
Cheng M, Sheng L, Gao Q et al (2019) The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes bladder cancer progression via AFF4/NF-kappaB/MYC signaling network. Oncogene 38(19):3667–3680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0683-z
Figueroa JD, Ye Y, Siddiq A et al (2014) Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with bladder cancer risk. Hum Mol Genet 23(5):1387–1398. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt519
Fukai T, Ushio-Fukai M (2011) Superoxide dismutases: role in redox signaling, vascular function, and diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal 15(6):1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.3999
Garcia-Closas M, Ye Y, Rothman N et al (2011) A genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies a new susceptibility locus within SLC14A1, a urea transporter gene on chromosome 18q12.3. Human Mol Genet 20(21):4282–4289. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr342
Han J, Wang JZ, Yang X et al (2019) METTL3 promote tumor proliferation of bladder cancer by accelerating pri-miR221/222 maturation in m6A-dependent manner. Mol Cancer 18(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1036-9
Hart PC, Mao M, de Abreu AL et al (2015) MnSODupregulation sustains the Warburg effect via mitochondrial ROS and AMPK-dependent signalling in cancer. Nat Commun 6:6053. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7053
Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X et al (2011) N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat ChemBiol 7(12):885–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.687
Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y et al (2019) m(6)A mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J HematolOncol 12(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0830-6
Kiemeney LA, Thorlacius S, Sulem P et al (2008) Sequence variant on 8q24 confers susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer. Nat Genet 40(11):1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.229
Knowles MA, Hurst CD (2015) Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer 15(1):25–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3817
Kumar R, Lal N, Nemaysh V, Luthra PM (2018) Demethoxycurcumin mediated targeting of MnSOD leading to activation of apoptotic pathway and inhibition of Akt/NF-kappaB survival signalling in human glioma U87 MG cells. ToxicolApplPharmacol 345:75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.020
Li A, Chen YS, Ping XL et al (2017) Cytoplasmic m(6)A reader YTHDF3 promotes mRNA translation. Cell Res 27(3):444–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2017.10
Liu Y, Borchert GL, Donald SP et al (2005) MnSOD inhibits proline oxidase-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 26(8):1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi083
Liu J, Yue Y, Han D et al (2014) A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat ChemBiol 10(2):93–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1432
Liu N, Dai Q, Zheng G, He C, Parisien M, Pan T (2015) N(6)-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA-protein interactions. Nature 518(7540):560–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14234
Liu N, Zhou KI, Parisien M, Dai Q, Diatchenko L, Pan T (2017) N6-methyladenosine alters RNA structure to regulate binding of a low-complexity protein. Nucleic Acids Res 45(10):6051–6063. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx141
Ma S, Chen C, Ji X et al (2019) The interplay between m6A RNA methylation and noncoding RNA in cancer. J HematolOncol 12(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0805-7
Mao F, Xiao L, Li X et al (2016) RBP-Var: a database of functional variants involved in regulation mediated by RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D154–D163. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1308
Oberley LW (2005) Mechanism of the tumor suppressive effect of MnSOD overexpression. Biomed Pharmacotherap Biomed Pharmacotherap 59(4):143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2005.03.006
Pan T (2013) N6-methyl-adenosine modification in messenger and long non-coding RNA. Trends BiochemSci 38(4):204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2012.12.006
Ramaswami G, Deng P, Zhang R, Anna Carbone M, Mackay TF, Li JB (2015) Genetic mapping uncovers cis-regulatory landscape of RNA editing. Nature Communications 6:8194. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9194
Rothman N, Garcia-Closas M, Chatterjee N et al (2010) A multi-stage genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies multiple susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 42(11):978–984. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.687
Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C (2011) Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12(10):683–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3051
Selinski S (2017) Discovering urinary bladder cancer risk variants: status quo after almost ten years of genome-wide association studies. EXCLI J 16:1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2017-1000
Wang M, Chu H, Lv Q et al (2014) Cumulative effect of genome-wide association study-identified genetic variants for bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 135(11):2653–2660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28898
Wang M, Li Z, Chu H et al (2016) Genome-wide association study of bladder cancer in a Chinese cohort reveals a new susceptibility locus at 5q12.3. Cancer Res 76(11):3277–3284. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2564
Wang S, Sun C, Li J et al (2017) Roles of RNA methylation by means of N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) in human cancers. Cancer Lett 408:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.030
Wu H, Zheng J, Deng J et al (2013) A genetic polymorphism in lincRNA-uc003opf.1 is associated with susceptibility to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations. Carcinogenesis 34(12):2908–2917. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt252
Zarnack K, Konig J, Tajnik M et al (2013) Direct competition between hnRNP C and U2AF65 protects the transcriptome from the exonization of Alu elements. Cell 152(3):453–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.023
Zhang S, Zhao BS, Zhou A et al (2017) m(6)A Demethylase ALKBH5 maintains tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells by sustaining FOXM1 expression and cell proliferation program. Cancer Cell 31(4):591–606.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.013
Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, He C (2017) Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.132
Zhao Y, Shi Y, Shen H, Xie W (2020) m(6)A-binding proteins: the emerging crucial performers in epigenetics. J HematolOncol 13(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00872-8
Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y et al (2013) ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell 49(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015
Zheng J, Huang X, Tan W et al (2016) Pancreatic cancer risk variant in LINC00673 creates a miR-1231 binding site and interferes with PTPN11 degradation. Nat Genet 48(7):747–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3568
Zheng Y, Nie P, Peng D et al (2018) m6AVar: a database of functional variants involved in m6A modification. Nucleic Acids Res 46(D1):D139–d145. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx895
Funding
This study was supported in part by Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Public Health and Preventive Medicine).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZZ, LY and HC conceived and designed the experiments. HL, JG and YJ wrote the paper. QY, GM, MD, YG, YL, ZG, and MW contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. CQ, QL, GF, and LY recruited samples. All authors reviewed this manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The researches have acquired approval from the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University.
Consent for publication
All authors consented to publish this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
204_2020_2911_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplementary file1 (TIF 6235 kb) Supplementary Figure S1. The expression of SOD2 was significantly decreased in tumor tissues based on GEPIA2 (https://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/) online database. GEPIA, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis.
204_2020_2911_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary file2 (TIF 12666 kb) Supplementary Figure S2. Disordered SOD2 expression was associated with poor prognosis in multiple tumors patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of OS based on SOD2 expression using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/) online bioinformatics tool in 165 patients with rectum adenocarcinoma (A), 304 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (B), 530 patients with kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (C), and 259 patients with sarcoma (D), respectively. OS, overall survival.
204_2020_2911_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplementary file3 (TIF 6140 kb) Supplementary Figure S3. SNP rs5746136 (G>A) was an eQTL for SOD2 in heart(A) and esophagus(B) based on GTEx Portal data. GTEx, Genotype-Tissue Expression.
204_2020_2911_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Supplementary file4 (TIF 14951 kb) Supplementary Figure S4. SNP rs5746136 G>A was associated with the increasing of WTAP mRNA level in multiple normal tissues based on GTEx Portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/) online database.
204_2020_2911_MOESM5_ESM.tif
Supplementary file5 (TIF 635 kb) Supplementary Figure S5. Data from the m6AVar (https://m6avar.renlab.org/) online database predicts and visualizes m6A site located in SOD2 transcripts.
204_2020_2911_MOESM6_ESM.tif
Supplementary file6 (TIF 26 kb) Supplementary Figure S6. The m6A modification enzyme WTAP was aberrantly decreased in TCGA data (P = 0.030). TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
204_2020_2911_MOESM7_ESM.tif
Supplementary file7 (TIF 261 kb) Supplementary Figure S7. EJ and J82 cells were transfected with SOD2-expressing plasmid or NC vector and the over-expression effect was verified at mRNA level by qRT-PCR(A) and protein level by Western blotting (B). All of the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Results were presented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01. qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H., Gu, J., Jin, Y. et al. Genetic variants in N6-methyladenosine are associated with bladder cancer risk in the Chinese population. Arch Toxicol 95, 299–309 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02911-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02911-2