Skip to main content
Log in

Racial/ethnic differences in hip and diaphyseal femur fractures

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Contemporary femur fracture rates were examined in northern California women and compared by race/ethnicity. During 2006–2012, hip fracture rates declined, but diaphyseal fracture rates increased, especially in Asians. Women with diaphyseal fracture were younger and more likely to be bisphosphonate-treated. These disparities in femur fracture should be further examined.

Introduction

The epidemiology of diaphyseal femur fracture differs from proximal femur (hip) fracture, although few studies have examined demographic variations in the current era. This study examines contemporary differences in low-energy femur fracture by race/ethnicity in a large, diverse integrated health-care delivery system.

Methods

The incidence of hip and diaphyseal fracture in northern California women aged ≥50 years old during 2006–2012 was examined. Hip (femoral neck and pertrochanteric) fractures were classified by hospital diagnosis codes, while diaphyseal (subtrochanteric and femoral shaft) fractures were further adjudicated based on radiologic findings. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from health plan databases. Fracture incidence was examined over time and by race/ethnicity.

Results

There were 10,648 (97.3 %) hip and 300 (2.7 %) diaphyseal fractures among 10,493 women. The age-adjusted incidence of hip fracture fell from 281 to 240 per 100,000 women and was highest for white women. However, diaphyseal fracture rates increased over time, with a significant upward trend in Asians (9 to 27 per 100,000) who also had the highest rate of diaphyseal fracture. Women with diaphyseal fracture were younger than women with hip fracture, more likely to be of Asian race and to have received bisphosphonate drugs. Women with longer bisphosphonate treatment duration were also more likely to have a diaphyseal fracture, especially younger Asian women.

Conclusion

During 2006 to 2012, hip fracture rates declined, but diaphyseal fracture rates increased, particularly among Asian women. The association of diaphyseal fracture and bisphosphonate therapy should be further investigated with examination of fracture pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Adams AL, Shi J, Takayanagi M, Dell RM, Funahashi TT, Jacobsen SJ (2013) Ten-year hip fracture incidence rate trends in a large California population, 1997–2006. Osteoporos Int 24:373–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M, Cosman F (2010) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int 21:399–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ettinger B, Black DM, Dawson-Hughes B, Pressman AR, Melton LJ 3rd (2010) Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 21:25–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302:1573–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng AC, Drake MT, Clarke BL, Sems SA, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Melton LJ 3rd (2012) Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984–2007. Osteoporos Int 23:1721–1726

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2011) Trends in incidence of subtrochanteric fragility fractures and bisphosphonate use among the US elderly, 1996–2007. J Bone Miner Res 26:553–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Al Dabbagh Z, Jansson KA (2009) National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femoral shaft fractures: stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury 40:304–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goh SK, Yang KY, Koh JS, Wong MK, Chua SY, Chua DT, Howe TS (2007) Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate therapy: a caution. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neviaser AS, Lane JM, Lenart BA, Edobor-Osula F, Lorich DG (2008) Low-energy femoral shaft fractures associated with alendronate use. J Orthop Trauma 22:346–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR et al (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25:2267–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang SY, Grimsrud CD, Provus J, Hararah M, Chandra M, Ettinger B, Lo JC (2012) The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification. Osteoporos Int 23:743–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo JC, Huang SY, Lee GA, Khandelwal S, Provus J, Ettinger B, Gonzalez JR, Hui RL, Grimsrud CD (2012) Clinical correlates of atypical femoral fracture. Bone 51:181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41:739–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–S133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Table 1: population: age and sex composition in the United States, 2010. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. http://www.census.gov/population/age/data/2010comp.html Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  16. Looker AC, Melton LJ 3rd, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA (2012) Changes in femur neck bone density in US adults between 1988–1994 and 2005–2008: demographic patterns and possible determinants. Osteoporos Int 23:771–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright NC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Smith WK, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA, Yun H, Zhang J, Delzell ES (2012) Recent trends in hip fracture rates by race/ethnicity among older US adults. J Bone Miner Res 27:2325–2332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zingmond DS, Melton LJ 3rd, Silverman SL (2004) Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 15:603–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schilcher J, Michaëlsson K, Aspenberg P (2011) Bisphosphonate use and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft. N Engl J Med 364:1728–1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, Funahashi TT, Silverman SL, Eisemon EO, Zhou H, Burchette RJ, Ott SM (2012) Incidence of atypical nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. J Bone Miner Res 27:2544–2550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Kaiser Permanente Community Benefit Program. The authors would like to thank Joel Gonzalez for his help with data management and manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of interest

Joan Lo, Malini Chandra, and Rita Hui have received research funding from Amgen, Inc. Dr. Ettinger has received payments for expert testimony in litigation involving Fosamax. The remaining authors (Patricia Zheng, Christopher Grimsrud, Amer Budayr, Gene Lau, Maureen Baur, and Romain Neugebauer) have no conflict of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, J.C., Zheng, P., Grimsrud, C.D. et al. Racial/ethnic differences in hip and diaphyseal femur fractures. Osteoporos Int 25, 2313–2318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2750-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2750-1

Keywords

Navigation