Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Establishment of BMD reference plots and determination of peak BMD at multiple skeletal regions in mainland Chinese women and the diagnosis of osteoporosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem, particularly in women. Bone mineral density (BMD) reference plot is a basic, and the peak BMD (PBMD) an important, parameter in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. In order to establish reference plots of BMD at multiple skeletal sites in Chinese women and improve the diagnostic accuracy for osteoporosis, we measured BMDs at several skeletal regions in 3,378 Chinese women, aged 5–96 years, using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry fan-beam bone densitometer. After determining that the cubic regression model best fit all skeletal regions, we utilized the curve-fitting to establish BMD reference plots and utilized the curve-fitting equation to calculate the highest BMDs at all skeletal regions using three different methods of calculation—actual PBMD (method A), PBMD of each 5-year age group (method B), and a cross-section of age (method C). When the three methods were compared, we found significant differences among them at the majority of skeletal regions studied. When we utilized these three methods to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in 2,120 women aged 40 years and older, except for the Ward’s triangle, we observed significant differences among them at all skeletal regions. In the present study, we established new BMD reference plots at multiple skeletal regions for women of mainland China. Our findings also indicate that curve-fitting equations can be employed to calculate actual PBMDs specific to individual regions, and that the use of different methods to calculate PBMD may have a significant impact on both PBMD and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Therefore, we suggest that a standardized method be established to calculate site-specific PBMDs based on the peak values of best-fit reference curves in appropriate age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM (1997) The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int 7:7–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Consensus Development Conference (1997) Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 7:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conference Report (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ III (1997) Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:24–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujiwara S (1995) [Estimating incidence of osteoporosis by bone mineral density, from population based study] (in Japanese). Jyouju kagaku kenkyuu kenkyuuhoukoku (Report of Aging and Health Reasearch) 4:508–511

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Z, Piao J, Pang X et al (2002) The diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis and the incidence of osteoporosis in China. J Bone Miner Metab 20:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series. WHO, Geneva

  8. Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hologic (1996) QDR 4500 X-ray bone densitometer user’s guide. Hologic, Bedford, MA

  10. Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly TL (1992) Study protocol QDR reference databases. Hologic, Bedford, MA

  12. Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura K, Tanaka Y, Saitou K, Nashimoto M, Yamamoto M (2000) Age and sex differences in the bone mineral density of the distal forearm based on health check-up data of 6343 Japanese. Osteoporos Int 11:772–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao WJ, Wu CH, Wang ST, Chang CJ, Chiu NT, Yu CY (2001) Differential changes in regional bone mineral density in healthy Chinese: age-related and sex-dependent. Calcif Tissue Int 68:330–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao EY, Wu XP, Deng XG et al (2002) Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 13:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arlot ME, Sornay-Rendu E, Garnero P, Vey-Marty B, Delmas PD (1997) Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY Cohort. J Bone Miner Res 12:683–690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Looker A, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed AIH, Blake GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman J (1997) Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis? Osteoporos Int 7:432–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delezé M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR et al (2000) Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women. Osteoporos Int 11:562–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Yoneshima H, Marumo F for the JPOS Group (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis Study (JPOS). Osteoporos Int 12:529–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonnick SL, Johnston CC Jr, Kleerekoper M et al (2001) Importance of precision in bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 4:105–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu XP, Liao EY, Huang G, Dai RC, Zhang H (2003) A comparison study of the reference curves of bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women. Calcif Tissue Int 73(2):122–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao EY, Wu XP, Luo XH et al (2003) Establishment and evaluation of bone mineral density reference databases appropriate for diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis in Chinese women. J Bone Miner Metab 21:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaneko M, Miyake T, Yokoyama E et al (2000) Standard radial bone mineral density and physical factors in ordinary Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab 18:31–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin JC, Reid DM (1999) Radial bone mineral density and estimated rates of change in normal Scottish women: assessment by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 64:126–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:120–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelly TL (1990) Bone mineral density reference databases for American men and women. J Bone Miner Res 5[Suppl 2]:S249

  28. Van Der Klift M, Pols HA, Geleijnse JM, Van Der Kuip DA, Hofman A, De Laet CE (2002) Bone mineral density and mortality in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone 30:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E (2001) Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 12:538–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Prior JC, Vigna YM, Schechter MT, Burgess AE (1990) Spinal bone loss and ovulatory disturbances. N Engl J Med 323:1221–1227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sowers MD, Clark MK, Hollis B, Wallace RB, Jannausch M (1992) Radial bone mineral density in pre- and perimenopausal women: a prospective study of rates and risks factors for loss. J Bone Miner Res 7:647–657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian-Ping Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, XP., Liao, EY., Zhang, H. et al. Establishment of BMD reference plots and determination of peak BMD at multiple skeletal regions in mainland Chinese women and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15, 71–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1517-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1517-x

Keywords

Navigation