Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of female pelvic floor support to the urethra using 3D transperineal ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To explore the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) transperineal tomographic ultrasound in evaluating pelvic floor support of the urethra in women.

Methods

Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volume data sets of 50 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 25 women without SUI were obtained for analysis. Pelvic floor support of the urethra was evaluated by studying the relationship between the urethra and vagina in vaginal cross section and quantified by estimating the urethral depression (UD) rate. The extent of paravaginal support at level II was also evaluated in tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) mode in all participants. Two-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The extent of paravaginal support at level II showed no difference between the two groups. Posterior depression of the urethra into the anterior vaginal wall was increased in SUI (P < 0.05). When the UD rate value was 0.53 (CI 85%) combined with three continuous “abnormal slices,” the maximum Youden Index value (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.88) was obtained to screen dysfunctional support of the urethra.

Conclusions

The pelvic floor support of the urethra can be evaluated indirectly by studying the relationship between the urethra and anterior vaginal wall in the vaginal cross section by TUI. The obvious posterior depression of the urethra into the anterior vaginal wall could be indirect evidence of a defect in the support of the urethra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Komesu YM, Schrader RM, Ketai LH, Rogers RG, Dunivan GC. Epidemiology of mixed, stress, and urgency urinary incontinence in middle-aged/older women: the importance of incontinence history. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):763–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2888-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds WS, Dmochowski RR, Penson DF. Epidemiology of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):370–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0206-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):363–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0215-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashton-Miller JA, Howard D, DeLancey JO. The functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor and stress continence control system. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2001;(207):1–7 discussion 106-125.

  7. Delancey JO. Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713–20. discussion 1720-1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology. 1991;179(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(3):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00877.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(1):80–92.https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huddleston HT, Dunnihoo DR, Huddleston PM 3rd, Meyers PC Sr. Magnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey's vaginal support levels I, II, and III. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(6):1778–82. discussion 1782-1774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Macura KJ, Thompson RE, Bluemke DA, Genadry R. Magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of stress urinary incontinence in women: parameters differentiating urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. World J Radiol. 2015;7(11):394–404. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i11.394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tillack AA, Joe BN, Yeh BM, Jun SL, Kornak J, Zhao S, et al. Vaginal shape at resting pelvic MRI: predictor of pelvic floor weakness? Clin Imaging. 2015;39(2):285–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Pang S, Korda A, Benness C. Paravaginal defects: a comparison of clinical examination and 2D/3D ultrasound imaging. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(3):187–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00377.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Hastings R. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: the effect of parturition on paravaginal support structures.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(6):589–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tunn R, Goldammer K, Neymeyer J, Gauruder-Burmester A, Hamm B, Beyersdorff D. MRI morphology of the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in women with stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;126(2):239–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):661–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3096-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schussler B, Alloussi S. [Ingelman-Sundberg classification of stress incontinence]. Gynakol Rundsch. 1983;23(3):166–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dou C, Li Q, Ying T, Shui W, Yan Y, Luo Y, et al. Value of transperineal ultrasound on the observation of paravaginal support. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(4):943–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4659-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delancey JO. Why do women have stress urinary incontinence? Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(Suppl 1):S13–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20888.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. DeLancey JO. Anatomy and physiology of urinary continence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990;33(2):298–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, et al. Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(5):488 e481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan DM, Cardoza P, Guire K, Fenner DE, DeLancey JO. Levator ani defect status and lower urinary tract symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0970-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shek KL, Pirpiris A, Dietz HP. Does levator avulsion increase urethral mobility? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153(2):215–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hegde A, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Levator ani defects in patients with stress urinary incontinence: three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3068-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cassado-Garriga J, Wong V, Shek K, Dietz HP. Can we identify changes in fascial paravaginal supports after childbirth? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (no. 81571699) and Shanghai Key Discipline of Medical Imaging (no. 2017ZZ02005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Ying or Qin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shui, W., Luo, Y., Ying, T. et al. Assessment of female pelvic floor support to the urethra using 3D transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 31, 149–154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03946-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03946-5

Keywords

Navigation