Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
To explore the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) transperineal tomographic ultrasound in evaluating pelvic floor support of the urethra in women.
Methods
Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound volume data sets of 50 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 25 women without SUI were obtained for analysis. Pelvic floor support of the urethra was evaluated by studying the relationship between the urethra and vagina in vaginal cross section and quantified by estimating the urethral depression (UD) rate. The extent of paravaginal support at level II was also evaluated in tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) mode in all participants. Two-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The extent of paravaginal support at level II showed no difference between the two groups. Posterior depression of the urethra into the anterior vaginal wall was increased in SUI (P < 0.05). When the UD rate value was 0.53 (CI 85%) combined with three continuous “abnormal slices,” the maximum Youden Index value (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.88) was obtained to screen dysfunctional support of the urethra.
Conclusions
The pelvic floor support of the urethra can be evaluated indirectly by studying the relationship between the urethra and anterior vaginal wall in the vaginal cross section by TUI. The obvious posterior depression of the urethra into the anterior vaginal wall could be indirect evidence of a defect in the support of the urethra.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Komesu YM, Schrader RM, Ketai LH, Rogers RG, Dunivan GC. Epidemiology of mixed, stress, and urgency urinary incontinence in middle-aged/older women: the importance of incontinence history. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):763–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2888-1.
Reynolds WS, Dmochowski RR, Penson DF. Epidemiology of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):370–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0206-0.
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.
Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1311.
Stothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):363–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0215-z.
Ashton-Miller JA, Howard D, DeLancey JO. The functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor and stress continence control system. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2001;(207):1–7 discussion 106-125.
Delancey JO. Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):93–8.
DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713–20. discussion 1720-1713.
Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.
Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology. 1991;179(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006286.
Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(3):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00877.x.
Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(1):80–92.https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.939.
Huddleston HT, Dunnihoo DR, Huddleston PM 3rd, Meyers PC Sr. Magnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey's vaginal support levels I, II, and III. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(6):1778–82. discussion 1782-1774.
Macura KJ, Thompson RE, Bluemke DA, Genadry R. Magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of stress urinary incontinence in women: parameters differentiating urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. World J Radiol. 2015;7(11):394–404. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i11.394.
Tillack AA, Joe BN, Yeh BM, Jun SL, Kornak J, Zhao S, et al. Vaginal shape at resting pelvic MRI: predictor of pelvic floor weakness? Clin Imaging. 2015;39(2):285–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.10.007.
Dietz HP, Pang S, Korda A, Benness C. Paravaginal defects: a comparison of clinical examination and 2D/3D ultrasound imaging. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(3):187–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00377.x.
Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Hastings R. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: the effect of parturition on paravaginal support structures.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(6):589–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.100.
Tunn R, Goldammer K, Neymeyer J, Gauruder-Burmester A, Hamm B, Beyersdorff D. MRI morphology of the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in women with stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;126(2):239–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.018.
Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):661–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3096-3.
Schussler B, Alloussi S. [Ingelman-Sundberg classification of stress incontinence]. Gynakol Rundsch. 1983;23(3):166–74.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798.
Dou C, Li Q, Ying T, Shui W, Yan Y, Luo Y, et al. Value of transperineal ultrasound on the observation of paravaginal support. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(4):943–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4659-y.
Delancey JO. Why do women have stress urinary incontinence? Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(Suppl 1):S13–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20888.
DeLancey JO. Anatomy and physiology of urinary continence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990;33(2):298–307.
Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, et al. Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(5):488 e481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.002.
Morgan DM, Cardoza P, Guire K, Fenner DE, DeLancey JO. Levator ani defect status and lower urinary tract symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0970-2.
Shek KL, Pirpiris A, Dietz HP. Does levator avulsion increase urethral mobility? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153(2):215–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.036.
Hegde A, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Levator ani defects in patients with stress urinary incontinence: three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3068-7.
Cassado-Garriga J, Wong V, Shek K, Dietz HP. Can we identify changes in fascial paravaginal supports after childbirth? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(1):70–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12261.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (no. 81571699) and Shanghai Key Discipline of Medical Imaging (no. 2017ZZ02005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shui, W., Luo, Y., Ying, T. et al. Assessment of female pelvic floor support to the urethra using 3D transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 31, 149–154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03946-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03946-5