Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Post-operative review allows assessment of individual patient outcome, evaluation of any ongoing symptoms and an audit of departmental surgical outcome and therefore represents best clinical practice. Current TVT surgery follow-up practice varies widely, with most centres routinely seeing patients face to face in an outpatient setting. However, unnecessary outpatient attendance can be inefficient and inconvenient for patients and staff. One proposed alternative is telemedical follow-up, as introduced by our unit in 2010. We report on 5 years of experience with telephone follow-up.
Methods
The British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database was searched for all cases of primary retropubic TVT slings performed by the unit in the period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. Cases identified from the BSUG database then had their case notes reviewed. Patients having additional surgery were excluded from analysis. This yielded a cohort of 356 patients. No ethical approval was required for this investigation as it was a simple observational study (clinical audit).
Results
Two hundred and sixty-two patients were initially followed up via telephone; the remaining 94 were seen in a conventional outpatient clinic setting. Of the 262 followed up by telephone, 28 patients (10 %) subsequently required review in an outpatient clinic for a variety of reasons.
Conclusions
Telephone follow-up is an appropriate mode of follow-up for uncomplicated primary incontinence surgery. By using telemedicine, 234 patients who would previously have been seen in clinic were followed up remotely, saving valuable clinic time for patients with greater clinical need.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 7(2):81–86
Medicines and Healthcare products regulatory agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory-agency
Bateman AG, Neilens H, Gericke CA, George J, Freeman RM (2014) Is there a need for postoperative follow-up after routine urogynaecological procedures? Patients will self-present if they have problems. Int Urogynecol J 25(3):381–386
Waghorn A, Thompson J, McKee M (1995) Routine surgical follow up: do surgeons agree? BMJ 311(7016):1344–1345
Uppal S, Nadig S, Mielcarek MW, Smith L, Jose J, Coatesworth AP (2003) Patient satisfaction with conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. Int J Clin Pract 57(9):835–839
Wootton R, Bahaadinbeigy K, Hailey D (2011) Estimating travel reduction associated with the use of telemedicine by patients and healthcare professionals: proposal for quantitative synthesis in a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 11:185
Burch J (2012) Enhanced recovery and nurse-led telephone follow-up post surgery. Br J Nurs 21(16):S24-6–S28-9
Glavind K, Bjørk J (2013) Follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape operation in everyday practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(3):349–351
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jefferis, H., Muriithi, F., White, B. et al. Telephone follow-up after day case tension-free vaginal tape insertion. Int Urogynecol J 27, 787–790 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2891-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2891-6