Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship of 3-D translabial ultrasound anal sphincter complex measurements to postpartum anal and fecal incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We aimed to determine whether anal sphincter complex (ASC) measurements on translabial ultrasound (TL-US) were related to anal incontinence (AI) or fecal incontinence (FI) symptoms 6 months postpartum.

Methods

A prospective cohort of primiparous women underwent TL-US 6 months after a vaginal birth (VB) or cesarean delivery (CD). Muscle thickness was measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock positions of the external anal sphincter (EAS), the same four quadrants of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) at proximal, mid, and distal levels, and at the bilateral pubovisceralis muscle (PVM). Measurements were correlated to AI and FI on the Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scale, with sub-analyses by mode of delivery. The odds ratio (OR) of symptoms was calculated for every 1 mm increase in muscle thickness (E1MIT).

Results

A total of 423 women (299 VB, 124 CD) had TL-US 6 months postpartum. Decreased AI risk was associated with thicker measurements at the 6 o’clock (OR 0.74 E1MIT) and 9 o’clock proximal IAS (OR 0.71 E1MIT) in the entire cohort. For CD women, thicker measurements of the 9 o’clock proximal IAS were associated with decreased risk of AI (OR 0.56 E1MIT) and thicker distal 6 o’clock IAS measurements were related to a decreased risk of FI (OR 0.37 E1MIT). For VB women, no sphincter measurements were significantly related to symptoms, but thicker PVM measurements were associated with increased risk of AI (right side OR 1.32 E1MIT; left side OR 1.21 E1MIT).

Conclusions

ASC anatomy is associated with AI and FI in certain locations; these locations vary based on the patient’s mode of delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boreham M, Richter H, Kenton K, Nager C, Gregory WT, Aronson MP, Vogt V, Mcintire D, Schaffer J (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1637–1642

  2. Cichowski SB, Komesu YM, Dunivan GC, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2014) Written versus oral disclosure of fecal and urinary incontinence in women with dual incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 25(9):1257–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell SA, Flowerdew G, Gilmour D, Turnbull GK, Schmidt MH, Baskett TF, Fanning CA (2012) Overlapping compared with end-to-end repair of complete third-degree or fourth-degree obstetric tears: three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120(4):803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2010) Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217.e1–217.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Norderval S, Marskog A, Røssaak K, Vonen B (2008) Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(1):78–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH, Jung SA et al (2009) Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(2):205–211

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oude Lohuis EJ, Everhardt E (2014) Outcome of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in terms of persisting endoanal ultrasonographic defects and defecatory symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 126(1):70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall RJ, Rogers RG, Saiz L, Qualls C (2007) Translabial ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter complex: normal measurements of the internal and external anal sphincters at the proximal, mid-, and distal levels. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(8):881–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2014) Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J 25(3):329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handa VL, Nygaard I, Kenton K et al (2009) Pelvic organ support among primiparous women in the first year after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(12):1407–1411

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. How P, Evans J, Moran B et al (2012) Preoperative MRI sphincter morphology and anal manometry: can they be markers of functional outcome following anterior resection for rectal cancer? Colorectal Dis 14(6):e339–e345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. West RL, Felt-Bersma RJ, Hansen BE et al (2005) Volume measurements of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images. Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):540–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers R, Leeman L, Borders N, Qualls C, Fullilove A, Teaf D, Hall R, Bedrick E, Albers L (2014) Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women. BJOG 121(9):1145–1153

  15. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2014) Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements. Int Urogynecol J

  16. Delancey JO, Toglia MR, Perucchini D (1997) Internal and external anal sphincter anatomy as it relates to midline obstetric lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 90(6):924–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valsky DV, Yagel S (2007) Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography of the pelvic floor: improving visualization for new clinical applications and better functional assessment. J Ultrasound Med 26(10):1373–1387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JH, Pretorius DH, Weinstein M, Guaderrama NM, Nager CW, Mittal RK (2007) Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating anal sphincter muscles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(2):201–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jorge J, Wexner S (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG 117(12):1485–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Hussain H, Umek W, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109(2 Pt 1):295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dietz HP, Simpson JM (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115(8):979–984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lammers K, Fütterer JJ, Prokop M, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB (2012) Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: as systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomic defect. Int Urogynecol J 23(12):1653–1664

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329(26):1905–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faridi A, Willis S, Schelzig P, Siggelkow W, Schumpelick V, Rath W (2002) Anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery–an argument for cesarean section on request? J Perinat Med 30(5):379–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

K.V. Meriwether, R.J. Hall, L.M. Leeman, L. Migliaccio, and C. Qualls have no conflicts of interest to disclose. R.G. Rogers is Chair DSMB for the Transform trial sponsored by American Medical Systems.

Authors’ contributions

K.V. Meriwether: data analysis, manuscript writing; R.J. Hall: study development, data collection/management, manuscript editing; L.M. Leeman: protocol/project development, data collection/management, manuscript editing; L. Migliaccio: protocol/project development, manuscript editing; C. Qualls: data analysis, manuscript editing; R.G. Rogers: protocol/project development, data collection/management, manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate V. Meriwether.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meriwether, K.V., Hall, R.J., Leeman, L.M. et al. The relationship of 3-D translabial ultrasound anal sphincter complex measurements to postpartum anal and fecal incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 26, 1191–1199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2676-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2676-y

Keywords

Navigation