Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanical properties of pelvic soft tissue of young women and impact of aging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The female pelvic floor is a complex network of ligaments and muscles whose mechanical properties have not been completely understood. The goal of this study is to understand the biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor tissues of young women and the impact of aging.

Methods

Biomechanical uniaxial tension tests were performed on pelvic floor tissues (ligaments and organs) of six young female cadavers (average 29 years old). Results have been analyzed in order to define the characteristics of the mechanical properties of young pelvic soft tissues. Results have been compared with those in the literature in order to understand the similarities and discrepancies between young and old patients.

Results

Damageable, nonlinear elastic biomechanical behavior is observed. The variation in stiffness among the pelvic floor organs could be shown. Ligaments and the vaginal wall are the most rigid organs, whereas the rectum and bladder tend to be less rigid (approximately two times less rigid for small deformations and three times less rigid for large deformations). This study shows that ligaments and the vaginal wall of young women have similar mechanical behavior while those of older women differ. Furthermore, young women’s tissues differ slightly from older women’s tissues.

Conclusions

Results show that aging and possibly diverse “trauma” have an impact on modifying the mechanical behavior of pelvic floor tissues. Over time pelvic floor ligaments and vaginal tissues will differentiate and acquire different mechanical behavior, as seen within the literature in older cadavers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samuelsson EC, Arne Victor FT, Tibblin G et al (1997) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bump RC, Norton PA (1998) Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:723–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY (2001) The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubod C, Brieu M, Cosson M, et al. Biomechanical properties of human pelvic organs. Int Urogynecol J 79(4):968.e17–968.e22. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1237-7

  6. Rivaux G, Rubod C, Dedet B et al. Uterine ligaments: are they stronger than vaginal tissue? A biomechanics study. Int Urogynecol J (in press)

  7. Epstein LB, Graham CA, Heit MH (2007) Systemic and vaginal biomechanical properties of women with normal vaginal support and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:165.e1–165.e6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lei L, Song Y, Chen R (2007) Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int Urogynecol J 18:603–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiao Y, Pan E, Chakravarthula SS (2005) Measurement of mechanical properties of rectal wall. J Mater Sci 16:183–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clobes A, DeLancey JOL, Morgan DM (2008) Urethral circular smooth muscle in young and old women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:587.e1–587.e5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clay JC, Rubod C, Brieu M et al (2010) Biomechanical properties of prolapsed or non-prolapsed vaginal tissue: impact on prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 21:1535–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M et al (2007) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. Part 1: new experimental protocol. J Urol 178:320–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullins L (1947) Effect of stretching on the properties of rubber. J Rubber Res 19:275–289

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merckel Y, Diani J, Brieu M (2011) Experimental characterization and modelling of the cyclic softening of carbon-black filled rubbers. Mater Sci Eng A 528:8651–8659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merckel Y, Diani J, Brieu M (2011) A Mullins softening criterion for general loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 528:8651–8659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors announce a financial support of basic research by Ethicon. M. Cosson is a consultant of Ethicon, AMS, Boston Scientific, and Allergan. P. Chantereau is an employee of Ethicon and in the process of a PhD under the supervision of Prof. Cosson and Prof. Brieu.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Chantereau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chantereau, P., Brieu, M., Kammal, M. et al. Mechanical properties of pelvic soft tissue of young women and impact of aging. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1547–1553 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2439-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2439-1

Keywords

Navigation