Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Perineal trauma affects approximately 350,000 women per annum in the United Kingdom (UK) and is associated with considerable morbidity. Symptoms are most severe following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) compared with other grades of perineal trauma. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines indicate that the rate of OASIS is 1 % of vaginal deliveries. In 2011, the RCOG implemented the “Maternity Dashboard” so that units could benchmark their performance against national standards of which OASIS is a component. Our primary objective was to establish the national rate of OASIS and audit variations in incidence and management of obstetric perineal trauma.
Methods
We carried out a questionnaire-based survey auditing national practice. Every UK maternity unit was contacted regarding perineal outcomes after all deliveries between January 2009 and January 2010.
Results
215 of the 265 units in the UK responded (81 %). 692,259 of the 790,197 deliveries in the UK for the same period were sampled (88 %). 75 % delivered vaginally. The median national OASIS rate was 2.85 % (0–8 %). 20.2 % of women delivering vaginally had episiotomies; none were midline. 12.4 % of second-degree tears were not repaired in low-risk units compared with 5.9 % in high-risk units. 57.1 % of units used the perineal trauma classification of the RCOG.
Conclusions
This study provides comprehensive data regarding the incidence and management of perineal trauma across the UK. Clinicians and policy-makers, both local and at the RCOG, can devise up-to-date realistic guidelines on the anticipated rate of OASIS and help to assess the compliancy of units with guidelines on the appropriate management of perineal trauma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darbya L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223
Signorello L, Harlow B, Chekos A, Repke J (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: A retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:881–890
Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JOL, Rogers R (2003) Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1543–1550
Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C (2004) Incidence, severity and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1199–1204
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308(6933):887–891
Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones P (2000) Occult anal sphincters—myth or reality? Br J Obstet Gynecol 113:195–200
National Institute of Health and Clinical excellence (2007) Intrapartum care: care of health women and their babies during childbirth. NICE, London
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2007) Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears. Green Top Guidelines, no. 29. RCOG, London
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2008) Maternity dashboard clinical performance and governance and score card. Good Practice, no. 7. RCOG, London
Department of Health (2007) On the state of public health: annual report of the chief medical officer 2006. Chapter 6: Intrapartum-related deaths: 500 missed opportunities. Stationery Office www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/
Office for National Statistics (2012) Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/birth-summary-tables--england-and-wales/2009/index.html. Accessed 30 April 2013
Laine K, Skjeldestad F, Sandvik L, Staff A (2012) Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open 2:e001649
Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A, Gold R, Skornick-Rapaport A, Lessing J, Gordon D (2011) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):347.e1–347.e4
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG 113(2):195–200
Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2009) Structured hands-on training in repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): an audit of clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(11):1397
Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sanda B, Horne H, Spydslaug A, Staff A (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(4):319–324
Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265
Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES (2013) Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):66–71
Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven C (2003) Does perineal suturing make a difference? The suns trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110(7):684–689
Norton C, Christiansen J, Butler U et al (2002) Anal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury R, Wein A (eds). Incontinence, 2nd edn. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 985–1044
Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2010) Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):368–374
Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217.e1–217.e5
De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC et al (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(9):830–834
Reinbold D, Eboue C, Morello R et al (2011) From the impact of French guidelines to reduce episiotomy’s rate. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41(1):62–68
Asch D, Jedrziewski M, Christakis N (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136
Cook J, Dickinson H, Eccles M (2009) Response rates in postal surveys of health care professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. Bio Med Cent Health Serv Res 9:160
Treece E, Treece J (1986) Elements of research in nursing. Mosby, St. Louis, MO
Bowling A (2004) Data collection methods in quantitative research: questionnaires, interviews and their response rates. In: Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Open University Press, Maidenhead
Sultan AH, Stanton SL (1996) Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth—elective caesarean section? BJOG 103:731–734
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr van Delft and Miss Sivasubramaniam.
Ethical approval
This study did not need ethical approval as it was a survey of hospital maternity statistics.
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
G. Thiagamoorthy: has received funding from Astellas to attend conferences and an IUGA FRN grant to set up a multicentre research project; A. Johnson: none; R. Thakar: speaker for Astellas and Pfizer; A.H. Sultan: speaker for Astellas and Pfizer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thiagamoorthy, G., Johnson, A., Thakar, R. et al. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1621–1627 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x