Skip to main content
Log in

National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Perineal trauma affects approximately 350,000 women per annum in the United Kingdom (UK) and is associated with considerable morbidity. Symptoms are most severe following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) compared with other grades of perineal trauma. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines indicate that the rate of OASIS is 1 % of vaginal deliveries. In 2011, the RCOG implemented the “Maternity Dashboard” so that units could benchmark their performance against national standards of which OASIS is a component. Our primary objective was to establish the national rate of OASIS and audit variations in incidence and management of obstetric perineal trauma.

Methods

We carried out a questionnaire-based survey auditing national practice. Every UK maternity unit was contacted regarding perineal outcomes after all deliveries between January 2009 and January 2010.

Results

215 of the 265 units in the UK responded (81 %). 692,259 of the 790,197 deliveries in the UK for the same period were sampled (88 %). 75 % delivered vaginally. The median national OASIS rate was 2.85 % (0–8 %). 20.2 % of women delivering vaginally had episiotomies; none were midline. 12.4 % of second-degree tears were not repaired in low-risk units compared with 5.9 % in high-risk units. 57.1 % of units used the perineal trauma classification of the RCOG.

Conclusions

This study provides comprehensive data regarding the incidence and management of perineal trauma across the UK. Clinicians and policy-makers, both local and at the RCOG, can devise up-to-date realistic guidelines on the anticipated rate of OASIS and help to assess the compliancy of units with guidelines on the appropriate management of perineal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darbya L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Signorello L, Harlow B, Chekos A, Repke J (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: A retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:881–890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JOL, Rogers R (2003) Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1543–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C (2004) Incidence, severity and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1199–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308(6933):887–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones P (2000) Occult anal sphincters—myth or reality? Br J Obstet Gynecol 113:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Institute of Health and Clinical excellence (2007) Intrapartum care: care of health women and their babies during childbirth. NICE, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2007) Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears. Green Top Guidelines, no. 29. RCOG, London

  10. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2008) Maternity dashboard clinical performance and governance and score card. Good Practice, no. 7. RCOG, London

  11. Department of Health (2007) On the state of public health: annual report of the chief medical officer 2006. Chapter 6: Intrapartum-related deaths: 500 missed opportunities. Stationery Office www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/

  12. Office for National Statistics (2012) Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/birth-summary-tables--england-and-wales/2009/index.html. Accessed 30 April 2013

  13. Laine K, Skjeldestad F, Sandvik L, Staff A (2012) Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open 2:e001649

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A, Gold R, Skornick-Rapaport A, Lessing J, Gordon D (2011) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):347.e1–347.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG 113(2):195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2009) Structured hands-on training in repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): an audit of clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(11):1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sanda B, Horne H, Spydslaug A, Staff A (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(4):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES (2013) Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven C (2003) Does perineal suturing make a difference? The suns trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110(7):684–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Norton C, Christiansen J, Butler U et al (2002) Anal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury R, Wein A (eds). Incontinence, 2nd edn. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 985–1044

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2010) Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217.e1–217.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC et al (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(9):830–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reinbold D, Eboue C, Morello R et al (2011) From the impact of French guidelines to reduce episiotomy’s rate. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41(1):62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Asch D, Jedrziewski M, Christakis N (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook J, Dickinson H, Eccles M (2009) Response rates in postal surveys of health care professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. Bio Med Cent Health Serv Res 9:160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Treece E, Treece J (1986) Elements of research in nursing. Mosby, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bowling A (2004) Data collection methods in quantitative research: questionnaires, interviews and their response rates. In: Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sultan AH, Stanton SL (1996) Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth—elective caesarean section? BJOG 103:731–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr van Delft and Miss Sivasubramaniam.

Ethical approval

This study did not need ethical approval as it was a survey of hospital maternity statistics.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

G. Thiagamoorthy: has received funding from Astellas to attend conferences and an IUGA FRN grant to set up a multicentre research project; A. Johnson: none; R. Thakar: speaker for Astellas and Pfizer; A.H. Sultan: speaker for Astellas and Pfizer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. Sultan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiagamoorthy, G., Johnson, A., Thakar, R. et al. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1621–1627 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x

Keywords

Navigation