Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Normal urodynamic parameters in women

Part II—invasive urodynamics

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This literature review, providing reference ranges of normal variability in urodynamic parameters, is the second part of a two-part article. The first part addresses non-invasive urodynamics (UDS), while the second part addresses invasive techniques.

Methods

Data were obtained through MEDLINE from articles published between January 1956 and February 2011, International Continence Society meeting abstracts, and standardization reports. Search terms included cystometry, urethral pressure profilometry, leak point pressure, video UDS, normal volunteer, pressure flow studies, and electromyography.

Results

Normal values varied widely in the literature. However, with the help of clinical data, it was possible to define “normality” ranges for most of the different parameters.

Conclusions

Urodynamic evaluation of lower urinary tract (LUT) function is not a physiological test. However, it is still the best available tool for LUT function assessment. Even if normality in UDS can be defined, tests must always be interpreted against patient characteristics, complaints, and symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P (ed) (2006) Urodynamics. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chapple CR, MacDiarmid S, Patel A (eds) (2009) Urodynamics made easy. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrams PH, Dunn M, George N (1978) Urodynamic findings in chronic retention of urine and their relevance to results of surgery. Br Med J 2:1258–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S (2002) Cystometrical sensory data from a normal population: comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur Urol 42:34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blaivas JG, Chancellor M, Weiss J, Verhaaren M (eds) (2007) Atlas of urodynamics. Blackwell, Milton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT (1988) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 114:5–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates P, Bradley WE, Glen E, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling A, Hald T (1976) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Eur Urol 2:274–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyndaele JJ (1999) Normality in urodynamics studied in healthy adults. J Urol 161:899–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sullivan MP, Yalla SV (1996) Detrusor contractility and compliance characteristics in adult male patients with obstructive and nonobstructive voiding dysfunction. J Urol 155:1995–2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Theofrastous JP, Bump RC (1996) Bladder compliance in neurologically intact women. Neurourol Urodyn 15:483–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wahl EF, Lerman SE, Lahdes-Vasama TT, Churchill BM (2004) Measurement of bladder compliance can be standardized by a dimensionless number: clinical perspective. BJU Int 94:898–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahl EF, Lerman SE, Lahdes-Vasama TT, Churchill BM (2004) Measurement of bladder compliance can be standardized by a dimensionless number: theoretical perspective. BJU Int 94:895–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauwels E, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ (2004) Normality of bladder filling studied in symptom-free middle-aged women. J Urol 171:1567–1570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ouslander J, Leach G, Abelson S, Staskin D, Blaustein J, Raz S (1988) Simple versus multichannel cystometry in the evaluation of bladder function in an incontinent geriatric population. J Urol 140:1482–1486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson A, Webster G (eds) (2007) Urodynamic and videourodynamic evaluation of voiding dysfunction. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. McGuire EJ (1995) Urodynamic evaluation of stress incontinence. Urol Clin N Am 22:551–555

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ (2010) Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29:213–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bates CP, Bradley WE, Glen ES, Griffiths D, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling A, Hald T (1980) Third report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function procedures related to the evaluation of micturition: pressure–flow relationships. Residual urine. Produced by the International Continence Society, February 1977. Br J Urol 52:348–350

  21. Bates CP, Bradley WE, Glen ES, Griffiths D, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling A, Hald T (1980) Third report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Procedures related to the evaluation of micturition, pressure–flow relationships, residual urine. Produced by the International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology, Nottingham, February 1977. Eur Urol 6:170–171

  22. Abrams P (1999) Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int 84:14–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abrams P, Torrens M (1979) Urine flow studies. Urol Clin N Am 6:71–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim CS, Abrams P (1995) The Abrams–Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol 13:34–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schafer W (1995) Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol 13:47–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eri LM, Wessel N, Tysland O, Berge V (2002) Comparative study of pressure-flow parameters. Neurourol Urodyn 21:186–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Griffiths DJ (1996) Pressure-flow studies of micturition. Urol Clin North Am 23:279–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Vancaillie TG (2002) Female pelvic organ prolapse and voiding function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:284–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Griffiths D, Hofner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spangberg A, Gleason D (1997) Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. Neurourol Urodyn 16:1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Webster G, Koefoot R (1983) The after contraction in urodynamic micturition studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blaivas JG, Groutz A (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn 19:553–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Defreitas GA, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE, Shariat SF (2004) Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology 64:675–679, discussion 679–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, Roehrborn CG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE (1998) Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology 51:408–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brostrom S, Jennum P, Lose G (2002) Short-term reproducibility of cystometry and pressure-flow micturition studies in healthy women. Neurourol Urodyn 21:457–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuo HC (2004) Urodynamic parameters for the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urol Int 72:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lane TM, Shah PJ (2000) Leak-point pressures. BJU Int 86:942–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM (1981) Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 126:205–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, Bloom D, Sanvordenker J, Ritchey M, Gormley EA (1993) Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 150:1452–1454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, O’Connell HE (1996) Leak-point pressures. Urol Clin North Am 23:253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Corcos J, Schick E (eds) (2001) The urinary sphincter. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sorensen S, Waechter PB, Constantinou CE, Kirkeby HJ, Jonler M, Djurhuus JC (1991) Urethral pressure and pressure variations in healthy fertile and postmenopausal women with reference to the female sex hormones. J Urol 146:1434–1440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Geelen JM, Doesburg WH, Thomas CM, Martin CB Jr (1981) Urodynamic studies in the normal menstrual cycle: the relationship between hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle and the urethral pressure profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:384–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Rosenberg L, Schaefer W, Resnick NM (2007) Parameters of bladder function in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal continent women without detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn 26:356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nitti V (ed) (1998) Practical urodynamics. WB Sanders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yalla SV, Sharma GV, Barsamian EM (1980) Micturitional static urethral pressure profile: a method of recording urethral pressure profile during voiding and the implications. J Urol 124:649–656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Blaivas JG, Sinha HP, Zayed AA, Labib KB (1981) Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia: a detailed electromyographic study. J Urol 125:545–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Donnell P, Beck C, Doyle R, Eubanks C (1988) Surface electrodes in perineal electromyography. Urology 32:375–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sorensen SS, Nielsen JB, Norgaard JP, Knudsen LM, Djurhuus JC (1984) Changes in bladder volumes with repetition of water cystometry. Urol Res 12:205–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wyndaele JJ (1998) The normal pattern of perception of bladder filling during cystometry studied in 38 young healthy volunteers. J Urol 160:479–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Corcos J, Schick E (eds) (1996) Les vessies neurogènes de l’adulte. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wall L, Norton P, De Lancey J (eds) (1993) Practical urogynecology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mundy A, Stephenson T, Wein J (eds) (1984) Urodynamics. Principles, practice and application. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  53. Krane R, Siroky M (eds) (1991) Clinical neurourology. Little Brown & Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Wally Mahfouz, Tala Al Afraa, Lysanne Campeau & Jacques Corcos

  2. Department of Urology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada

    Jacques Corcos

Authors
  1. Wally Mahfouz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tala Al Afraa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lysanne Campeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacques Corcos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Corcos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahfouz, W., Al Afraa, T., Campeau, L. et al. Normal urodynamic parameters in women. Int Urogynecol J 23, 269–277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1585-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1585-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation