Erratum to: Int Urogynecol J
DOI 10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0
Incorrect data were given for the prevalence of clinically relevant POP. The correct overall presence of clinically relevant POP (≥ stage 2B) was 17.5% (n=114). Within this group, 30.7% (n=35) were symptomatic.
Furthermore, Table 4 was presented without the accompanying prognostic curve.
The authors sincerely regret these errors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slieker-ten Hove, M., Pool-Goudzwaard, A., Eijkemans, M. et al. Erratum to: Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J 21, 387–388 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1072-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1072-x