Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study is to provide long-term outcome data, at least 10 years, following laparoscopic colposuspension.

Methods

The study includes a control group who underwent open colposuspension. A consecutive series of 139 women who had undergone laparoscopic colposuspension were reviewed and compared to 52 women who had an open colposuspension in the same unit. Subjects were contacted by telephone, at least 10 years post-operatively, at which time a structured interview was performed which included the short-form Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom questionnaire.

Results

There was deterioration in subjective cure rates from 71% and 67% at 6 months to 52% and 36% at 10 years for the laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that laparoscopic colposuspension is probably as durable as open colposuspension. However, cure rates for both procedures appear to deteriorate over time, emphasising the importance of long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OAB:

Overactive bladder

sBFLUTS:

Short-form Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom questionnaire

References

  1. Carey MP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 113:999–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitchener HC et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension—results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG 113:1007–1013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL (1995) Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow up. BJOG 102:740–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kjolhede P (2005) Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:767–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilton PT (2002) Trials of surgery for stress incontinence thoughts on the Humpty Dumpty Principle. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:1081–1088

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lavin J et al (1998) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a minimum of 2 years follow up and comparison with open colposuspension. Gynaecol Endosc 7:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilton P (2008) Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim. BJOG 115:135–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ward KL, Hilton P (2008) Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 115:226–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona M. Reid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, S., Reid, F.M., North, C.E. et al. The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 20, 443–445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0798-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0798-1

Keywords

Navigation