Skip to main content
Log in

Stable sets in majority pillage games

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pillage game is a coalitional game in which any coalition can take all or part of the wealth of any less powerful coalition. Such an action is called pillage. In the majority pillage game, coalitional wealth contributes to coalitional power, but lexicographically less so than coalitional size. The majority pillage game refines the classic majority game in two respects. First, coalitional wealth can resolve ties in coalitional size. Second, a pillaging coalition need not contain a majority or even half of all of the players in the game. A majority of the players directly affected by the pillage, as winners or losers, is sufficient. This paper characterizes the stable sets of two and three-player games, and the symmetric (permutation invariant) stable sets of games with more than three players. For two or three players, the stable set is unique, and for any odd number of players, the symmetric stable set is unique and equal to the unique symmetric stable set for the classic majority game. If the number of players is even and at least four, no symmetric stable set exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asilis C, Kahn C (1992) Semi-stability in game theory: a survey of ugliness. In: Dutta B et al (eds) Game theory and economic applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott R (1953) Symmetric solutions to majority games. Contributions to the theory of games, annals of mathematical studies, vol. II, 28th edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J (2006) Pillage and property. J Econ Theory 131:26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas W (1992) Von Neumann-Morgenstern stable sets. In: Aumann R, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth A (1976) Subsolutions and the supercore of cooperative games. Math Oper Res 1:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.S. Jordan.

Additional information

Helpful conversations with Colin Rowat and useful comments of an anonymous referee are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jordan, J., Obadia, D. Stable sets in majority pillage games. Int J Game Theory 44, 473–486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-014-0440-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-014-0440-z

Keywords

Navigation