Abstract
Laffont and Tirole (Econometrica 56:1153–1175) show that when uncertainty about an agent’s ability is small, the equilibrium must involve a large amount of pooling, but, whether the continuation equilibrium induced by an optimal first-period menu of contracts is partitional or not, remains unclear. They construct a non-partitional continuation equilibrium for a given first-period menu of contracts and conjecture that this continuation equilibrium need not be suboptimal for the whole game under small uncertainty. We show that, irrespective of the amount of uncertainty, this non-partitional continuation equilibrium generates a strictly smaller payoff for the principal than a different menu of contracts with a partitional continuation equilibrium. In this sense, Laffont and Tirole’s menu of contracts, giving rise to a non-partitional continuation equilibrium, is not optimal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bester H, Strausz R (2001) Contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: the single agent case. Econometrica 69: 1077–1098
Caillaud B, Mezzetti C (2004) Equilibrium reserve prices in sequential ascending auctions. J Econ Theory 117: 78–95
Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1986) Using cost observation to regulate firms. J Polit Econ 94: 614–641
Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1988) The dynamics of incentive contracts. Econometrica 56: 1153–1175
Milgrom P, Segal I (2001) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70: 583–601
Sun CJ (2009) Dynamic price discrimination and quality provision based on purchase history. Working paper. Deakin University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Cj. A note on the dynamics of incentive contracts. Int J Game Theory 40, 645–653 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0254-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0254-6