Skip to main content
Log in

Modified minimum distance estimators: definition, properties and applications

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the location and scale parameters of a distribution is one of the most crucial issues in Statistics. Therefore, various estimators are proposed for estimating them, such as maximum likelihood, method of moments and minimum distance (e.g. Cramér-von Mises—CvM and Anderson Darling—AD), etc. However, in most of the cases, estimators of the location parameter \(\mu \) and scale parameter \(\sigma \) cannot be obtained in closed forms because of the nonlinear function(s) included in the corresponding estimating equations. Therefore, numerical methods are used to obtain the estimates of these parameters. However, they may have some drawbacks such as multiple roots, wrong convergency, and non-convergency of iterations. In this study, we adopt the idea of Tiku (Biometrika 54:155–165, 1967) into the CvM and AD methodologies with the intent of eliminating the aforementioned difficulties and obtaining closed form estimators of the parameters \(\mu \) and \(\sigma \). Resulting estimators are called as modified CvM (MCvM) and modified AD (MAD), respectively. Proposed estimators are expressed as functions of sample observations and thus their calculations are straightforward. This property also allows us to avoid computational cost of iteration. A Monte-Carlo simulation study is conducted to compare the efficiencies of the CvM and AD estimators with their modified counterparts, i.e. the MCvM and MAD, for the normal, extreme value and Weibull distributions for an illustration. Real data sets are used to show the implementation of the proposed estimation methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acitas S, Arslan T (2020) A comparison of different estimation methods for the parameters of the Weibull Lindley distribution. Eskisehir Teknik Üniv Bilim ve Teknol Dergisi B Teorik Bilimler 8(1):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Acitas S, Senoglu B (2020) Robust change point estimation in two-phase linear regression models: an application to metabolic pathway data. J Comput Appl Math 363:337–349

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Acitas S, Filzmoser P, Senoglu B (2020) A new partial robust adaptive modified maximum likelihood estimator. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104068

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akgül FG, Senoglu B (2018) Comparison of estimation methods for inverse Weibull distribution. In: Trends and perspectives in linear statistical inference. Springer, Cham, pp 1–22

  • Ali S, Dey S, Tahir MH, Mansoor M (2020) The comparison of different estimation methods for the parameters of flexible Weibull distribution. Commun Fac Sci Univ Ank Ser A1 Math Stat 69(1):794–814

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bakouch HS, Dey S, Ramos PL, Louzada F (2017) Binomial-exponential 2 distribution: different estimation methods with weather applications. Tend Mat Apl Comput 18(2):233–251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Shioya H, Park C (2011) Statistical inference-the minimum distance approach. CRC Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boos DD (1981) Minimum distance estimators for location and goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 76(375):663–670

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boos DD (1982) Minimum Anderson-Darling estimation. Commun Stat Theory Methods 11(24):2747–2774

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Balakrishnan N (1995) A general purpose approximate goodness-of-fit test. J Qual Technol 27(2):154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL, Liu RC (1988) The automatic robustness of minimum distance functionals. Ann Stat 16(2):552–586

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne T, Rioux J, Loung A (1997a) Minimum Cramér-von Mises distance methods for complete and grouped data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 26(2):401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne T, Rioux J, Loung A (1997b) Minimum Cramér-von Mises estimators and their influence function. Actuar Res Clear House 1:349–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffding W (1953) On the distribution of the expected values of the order statistics. Ann Math Stat 24(1):93–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kantar Y, Senoglu B (2008) A comparative study for the location and scale parameters of the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter. Comput Geosci 34:1900–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louzada F, Ramos PL, Perdona GS (2016) Different estimation procedures for the parameters of the extended exponential geometric distribution for medical data. Comput Math Methods Med 2016:12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Puthenpura S, Sinha NK (1986) Modified maximum likelihood method for the robust estimation of system parameters from very noise data. Automatica 22:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain JJ, Venkatraman S, Wilson JR (1988) Least-squares estimation of distribution functions in Johnson’s translation system. J Stat Comput Simul 29(4):271–297

  • Tiku ML (1967) Estimating the mean and standard deviation from a censored normal sample. Biometrika 54:155–165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tiku ML, Akkaya AD (2004) Robust estimation and hypothesis testing. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New Delhi

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan DC (1992) On the Tiku–Suresh method of estimation. Commun Stat Theory Methods 21(2):451–469

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions which improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talha Arslan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Let \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{n}\) be independent random variables from a cdf F(x). Without loss of generality, the location parameter \(\mu \) and scale parameter \(\sigma \) in dF(x) are assumed to be 0 and 1, respectively. Furthermore, \(x_{(1)} \le x_{(2)} \le \cdots \le x_{(n)}\) denote the order statistics and \(t_{(i)}\) are the expected values of the order statistics, i.e., \(t_{(i)}=E(x_{(i)})\), \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\). It is also assumed that

$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } |x| dF(x) < \infty . \end{aligned}$$

This implies that \(t_{(i)}\) values exist and are finite for all \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\).

Theorem 1

(Hoeffding 1953, p. 93) Let h(x) be a real-valued continuous function such that

$$\begin{aligned} |h(x)| \le g(x) \end{aligned}$$

where the function g(x) is convex and

$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } g(x) dF(x) < \infty . \end{aligned}$$

Then,

$$\begin{aligned} \lim \limits _{n \rightarrow \infty }\frac{1}{n}\sum _{i=1}^{n}h\left( t_{(i)}\right) =\int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty } h(x) dF(x). \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslan, T., Acitas, S. & Senoglu, B. Modified minimum distance estimators: definition, properties and applications. Comput Stat 37, 1551–1568 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01170-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01170-8

Keywords

Navigation