Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct metal laser–sintered 15-5PH steel with different solution annealing heat treatments

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

15-5PH parts that are fabricated using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) has shown mechanical properties comparable to conventionally manufactured parts. However, DMLS-fabricated 15-5PH parts have shown high anisotropy in their mechanical properties due to the layering nature of additive manufacturing process. In addition, the fatigue life and strength of DMLS 15-5PH varies significantly between horizontally and vertically fabricated parts and both orientations are inferior to conventionally manufactured parts. Reliability and large variations in performance remain as a barrier from employing 15-5PH parts fabricated using DMLS. Standard heat treatment of 15-5PH is insufficient to eliminate the anisotropy and homogenize the DMLS parts. Modified precipitation hardening heat treatments did not show further improvement in published literature. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the influence of different solution annealing heat treatments on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 15-5PH steel produced using DMLS. Three different solution annealing heat treatments were investigated: the standard solution heat treatment, the second heat treatment extended the time from 1 to 3 h, the third heat treatment increased the temperature from 1038 to 1200 °C. For each heat treatment, three patches of specimens were fabricated each in one of the three principal orientations X, Y, and Z. In addition, three patches, one of each orientation, were tested in as-built condition. The specimens were tensile tested and their microstructure and fractured surfaces were imaged. It was found that extending the time of the heat treatment improved the homogenization while increasing the temperature of the heat treatment to 1200 °C had detrimental effects, especially on vertically fabricated specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM:

additive manufacturing

DMLS:

direct metal laser sintering

BCC:

body-centered cubic

FCC:

face-centered cubic

BCT:

body-centered tetragonal

DIC:

digital image correlation

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

SEM:

scanning electron microscope

References

  1. Lewis GK, Schlienger E (2000) Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater Des 21:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gratton A (2012) Comparison of mechanical , metallurgical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel between direct metal laser sintering ( DMLS ) and traditional manufacturing methods. In: Proc. Natl. Conf. Undergrad. Res. 2012, pp 423–431

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jia Q, Gu D (Feb. 2014) Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd 585:713–721

    Google Scholar 

  4. Monkova K, Zetkova I, Kučerová L, Zetek M, Monka P, Daňa M (2019) Study of 3D printing direction and effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties of MS1 maraging steel. Arch Appl Mech 89(5):791–804

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Elwany A, Bian L (2017) Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 94:218–235

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amato KNN et al (2012) Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Mater 60(5):2229–2239

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trosch T, Strößner J, Völkl R, Glatzel U (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Inconel 718 compared to forging and casting. Mater Lett 164:428–431

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiumenti M et al (2017) Numerical modelling and experimental validation in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 18(October):171–185

    Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin J, Reutzel EW, Michaleris P, Keist J, Nassar AR (2016) Predicting microstructure from thermal history during additive manufacturing for Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(11):111007

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Promoppatum et al., “Numerical modeling and experimental validation of thermal history and microstructure for additive manufacturing of an Inconel 718 product,” Prog. Addit. Manuf., vol. 3, no. 1–2, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suryawanshi J, Prashanth KG, Ramamurty U (2017) Mechanical behavior of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 696:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Castañón MAG (2018) Effect of manufacturing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of metal laser sintering parts of precipitate hardenable metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(9–12):2491–2507

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beretta S, Romano S (2017) A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. Int J Fatigue 94:178–191

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mower TM, Long MJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured , powder-bed laser-fused materials. Mater Sci Eng A 651:198–213

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 6608(March):1–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. Makoana N, Yadroitsava I, Möller H, Yadroitsev I (2018) Characterization of 17-4PH single tracks produced at different parametric conditions towards increased productivity of LPBF systems—the effect of laser power and spot size upscaling. Metals (Basel) 8(7):475

    Google Scholar 

  17. Popovici TD, Dijmrescu MR, Angelastro A, Campanelli SL, Linda M (2017) Influence of laser power on microstructure of laser metal deposited 17–4 ph stainless steel influence of laser power on microstructure of laser metal deposited 17–4 ph stainless steel, pp 0–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti-6Al-4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vrancken B, Thijs L, Kruth J, Van Humbeeck J, Van Humbeeck J (2012) Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting : microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 541(0):177–185

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jafarlou DM, Walde C, Champagne VK, Krishnamurty S, Grosse IR (2018) Influence of cold sprayed Cr 3 C 2 -Ni coating on fracture characteristics of additively manufactured 15Cr-5Ni stainless steel. Mater Des 155:134–147, Oct

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Thöne, S. Leuders, A. Riemer, T. Tröster, and H. A. Richard, “Influence of heat-treatment on selective laser melting products – e.g. Ti6Al4V,” SFF, Austin Texas, pp. 492–498, 2012

  22. Abad A, Hahn M, Es-Said OS (2010) Corrosion of 15-5PH H1025 stainless steel due to environmental conditions. Eng Fail Anal 17(1):208–212

    Google Scholar 

  23. Couturier L, De Geuser F, Descoins M, Deschamps A (2016) Evolution of the microstructure of a 15-5PH martensitic stainless steel during precipitation hardening heat treatment. Mater Des 107:416–425

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abdelshehid M, Mahmodieh K, Mori K, Chen L, Stoyanov P, Davlantes D, Foyos J, Ogren J, Clark R Jr, Es-Said OS (2007) On the correlation between fracture toughness and precipitation hardening heat treatments in 15-5PH stainless steel. Eng Fail Anal 14(4):626–631

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen HC, Pinkerton AJ, Li L (2011) Fibre laser welding of dissimilar alloys of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 for aerospace applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(9–12):977–987

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kamal M, Rizza G (2019) Design for metal additive manufacturing for aerospace applications. Addit Manuf Aerosp Ind:67–86

  27. Dossett JL, Boyer HE (2006) Practical heat treating, 2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smallman RE and Ngan AHW, (2007) Physical metallurgy and advanced materials engineering

  29. Sakhawat S, Baig MN, Falahati A, Degischer HP, Dománková M, Mahmood A Investigations of precipitation in two different types of precipitation hardening stainless steels, pp 13–18

  30. Habibi Bajguirani HR (2002) The effect of ageing upon the microstructure and mechanical properties of type 15-5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 338(1–2):142–159

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Pal et al., “The effect of post-processing and machining process parameters on properties of Stainless Steel PH1 product produced by direct metal laser,” Procedia Eng., vol. 149, no. June, pp. 359–365, Jan. 2016

  32. Lum E, Palazotto AN, Dempsey A, and Abrahams R, “Analysis of the effects of additive manufacturing on the material properties of 15-5PH stainless steel,” in 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2017, no. January

  33. Buchanan C, Matilainen V-P, Salminen A, Gardner L (2017) Structural performance of additive manufactured metallic material and cross-sections. J Constr Steel Res 136:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rafi HK, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2013) A comparison of the tensile, fatigue, and fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V and 15-5 PH stainless steel parts made by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):1299–1309

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spierings AB, Starr TL, Wegener K (2013) Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 19:88–94

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yadollahi A, Simsiriwong J, Thompson SM (2016) Data demonstrating the effects of build orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17 – 4 PH stainless steel. Data Br 7:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Effects of different surface modifications on the fatigue life of selective laser melted 15–5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138109

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Effects of heat treatment and build orientations on the fatigue life of selective laser melted 15-5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 755:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Investigation on the mode of failures and fatigue life of laser-based powder bed fusion produced stainless steel parts under variable amplitude loading conditions. Addit Manuf 25:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  40. Masoomi M, Shamsaei N, Winholtz RA, Milner JL, Gnäupel-Herold T, Elwany A, Mahmoudi M, Thompson SM (2017) Data in brief residual stress measurements via neutron diffraction of additive manufactured stainless steel 17-4 PH. Data Br 13:408–414

    Google Scholar 

  41. Clausen B, Brown DW, Carpenter JS, Clarke KD, Clarke AJ, Vogel SC, Bernardin JD, Spernjak D, Thompson JM (2017) Deformation behavior of additively manufactured GP1 stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 696(February):331–340

    Google Scholar 

  42. Carlton HD, Haboub A, Gallegos GF, Parkinson DY, Macdowell AA (2016) Materials Science & Engineering a damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 651:406–414

    Google Scholar 

  43. Facchini L, Vicente N, Lonardelli I, Magalini E, Robotti P, Alberto M (2010) Metastable austenite in 17-4 precipitation-hardening stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Adv Eng Mater 12(3):184–188

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cheruvathur S, Lass EA, Campbell CE (2016) Additive manufacturing of 17-4 PH stainless steel: post-processing heat treatment to achieve uniform reproducible microstructure. Jom 68(3):930–942

    Google Scholar 

  45. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Olmi G, Bogojevic N, Ciric-Kostic S (2018) Effects of build orientation and thickness of allowance on the fatigue behaviour of 15–5 PH stainless steel manufactured by DMLS. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(4):900–916

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. M. Coffy, “Microstructure and chemistry evaluation of direct metal laser sintered 15-5 PH stainless steel,” Electron Theses Diss, vol Paper 4756, p. 160, 2014

  47. Rafi HK, Pal D, Patil N, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2014) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardenable steel processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 23(12):4421–4428

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2017) Effect of different heat treatments on mechanical properties of laser sintered additive manufactured parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(11):111010

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Ablat MA (2017) Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling. Open J Appl Sci 07(06):291–318

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Metallic additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art review and prospects. Mech Ind 13(2):89–96

    Google Scholar 

  51. ASTM (2012) F2921 - standard terminology for additive manufacturing — coordinate systems and test. Am Soc Test Mater, vol. i:12

  52. ASTM Int. and ASTM (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Astm, no. C, pp 1–27

  53. Moyer JM and Ansell GS, “The volume expansion accompanying the martensite transformation in iron-carbon alloys”

  54. Dempsey A, Liu D, Palazotto AN, Abrahams R (2016) Dynamic properties of additively manufactured 15-5 stainless steel and three-dimensional microstructure characterization. In: 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference

    Google Scholar 

  55. Huang E-W, Lee SY, Jain J, Tong Y, An K, Tsou NT, Lam TN, Yu D, Chae H, Chen SW, Chen SM, Chou HS (2019) Hardening steels by the generation of transient phase using additive manufacturing. Intermetallics 109:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sun Y, Hebert RJ, Aindow M (2018) Effect of heat treatments on microstructural evolution of additively manufactured and wrought 17-4PH stainless steel. Mater Des 156:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chae H, Huang EW, Jain J, Wang H, Woo W, Chen SW, Harjo S, Kawasaki T, Lee SY (2019) Plastic anisotropy and deformation-induced phase transformation of additive manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138065

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hu Z, Zhu H, Zhang H, Zeng X (2017) Experimental investigation on selective laser melting of 17-4PH stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 87:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  59. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Olmi G, Bogojevic N, and Ciric-Kostic S (2018) How build orientation and thickness of allowance may affect the fatigue response Of DMLS produced 15-5 PH stainless steel

  60. Alnajjar M, Christien F, Wolski K, Bosch C (2019) Evidence of austenite by-passing in a stainless steel obtained from laser melting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 25:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  61. yuan Peng X, liang X, ZHOU X, Hua Z, Wei Z w, LIU HY (2015) Effect of aging on hardening behavior of 15-5 PH stainless steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 22(7):607–614

    Google Scholar 

  62. Slunder AM, C. J., Hoenie AF, & Hall (1967) “Thermal and mechanical treatment for precipitation-hardening stainless steels,” NASA SP-5089

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ala Qattawi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alafaghani, A., Qattawi, A., Jaman, M.S. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct metal laser–sintered 15-5PH steel with different solution annealing heat treatments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 3499–3520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04404-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04404-8

Keywords

Navigation