Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

3D printing technologies for enhancing the sustainability of an aircraft manufacturing or MRO company—a multi-expert partial consensus-FAHP analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of three-dimensional (3D) printing can enhance not only the competitiveness but also the sustainability of an aircraft manufacturing or maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) company. This study sought to identify the critical factors for such applications. Herein, first, the long-term opportunities and challenges facing an aircraft manufacturing or MRO company planning to apply 3D printing technologies are discussed. The critical factors for enhancing their sustainability are identified from the discussion results. The priorities of critical factors are usually ranked using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). However, existing FAHP methods cannot rank priorities reasonably when experts (or decision-makers) fail to reach an overall consensus. To address this problem, a novel partial consensus (PC)-FAHP approach is proposed that seeks to obtain a partial consensus among experts. After assessing the effectiveness of the proposed methodology with a case study involving three experts, the most critical factors were identified to be the long-term cost-effectiveness, number or types of aircraft parts that are or will be 3D printable, and advances in research and development that have been made already or are expected in the near future. In addition, the ranking result obtained using the PC-FAHP approach was different from that obtained using existing FAHP methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn IH, Moon SK, Hwang J, Bi G (2017) Characteristic length of the solidified melt pool in selective laser melting process. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basak A, Das S (2016) Epitaxy and microstructure evolution in metal additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:125–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Budzik G (2007) Possibilities of using vacuum casting process for manufacturing cast models of turbocharger impellers. J KONES Powertrain Transport 14(2):125–130

    Google Scholar 

  5. Business Performance Management Singapore (2013) AHP – high consistency ratio. https://bpmsg.com/ahp-high-consistency-ratio/

  6. Chang D-Y (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen T (2012) A job-classifyingand data-mining approach for estimating job cycle time in a waferfabrication factory, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1):317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen T (2013) A flexible way of modelling the long-term cost competitiveness of a semiconductor product. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(3):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen T, Lin Y-C (2008) A fuzzy-neural system incorporating unequally important expert opinions for semiconductor yield forecasting, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge based Systems 16(1):35–58

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen T, Lin Y-C (2017) Feasibility evaluation and optimization of a smart manufacturing system based on 3D printing. Int J Intell Syst 32:394–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen T, Romanowski R (2014) Forecasting the productivity of a virtual enterprise by agent-based fuzzy collaborative intelligence – with Facebook as an example. Appl Soft Comput 24:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen T, Tsai H-R (2017) Ubiquitous manufacturing: current practices, challenges, and opportunities. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 45:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen T, Wang Y-C (2014) An agent-based fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach for precise and accurate semiconductor yield forecasting. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 22(1):201–211

  14. Chen T-CT, Wu H-C (2017) Quality control issues in 3D-printing manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J in press

  15. Daniel S, Doran MA (2013) geoSmartCity: geomatics contribution to the smart city. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp 65–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Erensal YC, Öncan T, Demircan ML (2006) Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Turkey. Inf Sci 176:2755–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Financeonline (2017) World airline fleets: top 10 aviation armadas with most airplanes. https://financesonline.com/world-airline-fleets-top-10-aviation-armadas-with-most-airplanes/. Accessed on June 30, 2017.

  18. Gebhardt A (2007) Rapid prototyping-rapid tooling-rapid manufacturing. Hanser Publishers, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gnanavelbabu A, Arunagiri P (2018) Ranking of MUDA using AHP and fuzzy AHP algorithm. Mater Today Proc 5(5-2):13406–13412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goel AK, McAdams DA, Stone RB (2015) Biologically inspired design. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Güran A, Uysal M, Ekinci Y (2017). An additive FAHP based sentence score function for text summarization. ITC 46:53–69

  22. Helsel S (2015) Airbus’ new A350 XWB aircraft contains over 1,000 3D-printed parts. http://inside3dprinting.com/news/airbus-new-a350-xwb-aircraft-contains-over-1000-3d-printed-parts/30291/. Accessed on June 15, 2017.

  23. Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Warren J, Das S, Nimbalkar S, Cresko J, Masanet E (2016) Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod 135:1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khorasani AM, Gibson I, Ghaderi AR (2018) Rheological characterization of process parameters influence on surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:3761–3775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kroll E, Artzi D (2011) Enhancing aerospace engineering students’ learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models. Rapid Prototyp J 17(5):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lima Junior FR, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2014) A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marks P (2011) 3D printing takes off with the world’s first printed plane. New Scientist 211(2823):17–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moon SK, Tan YE, Hwang J, Yoon YJ (2014) Application of 3D printing technology for designing light-weight unmanned aerial vehicle wing structures. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1(3):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murr LE (2016) Frontiers of 3D printing/additive manufacturing: from human organs to aircraft fabrication. J Mater Sci Technol 32(10):987–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ritchie JRB, Crouch GI, Hudson S (2001) Developing operational measures for the components of a destination competitiveness/sustainability model: consumer versus managerial perspectives. Consumer Psychol Tour Hosp Leisure 2:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen MA, Kishawy HA (2012) Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability 4(2):154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saaty TL (1989) Group decision making and the AHP. In: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 59–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Satty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y-C, Chen T, Yeh Y-L (2018) Advanced 3D printing technologies for the aircraft industry: a fuzzy systematic approach for assessing the critical factors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol in press

  35. Wedley WC (1993) Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices. Math Comput Model 17(4-5):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Welte T (2016) Opinion: solving aircraft overload with 3D printing. http://aviationweek.com/connected-aerospace/opinion-solving-aircraft-overload-3d-printing. Accessed on June 18, 2017.

  37. Yang K, El-Haik B (2008) Taguchi’s orthogonal array experiment. Design for Six Sigma: a roadmap for product development, pp 469-497

  38. Yap CY, Tan HK, Du Z, Chua CK, Dong Z (2017) Selective laser melting of nickel powder. Rapid Prototyp J 23(4):750–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2016-0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng G, Zhu N, Tian Z, Chen Y, Sun B (2012) Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Saf Sci 50:228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zyoud SH, Kaufmann LG, Shaheen H, Samhan S, Fuchs-Hanusch D (2016) A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 61:86–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, Feng Chia University, 100 Wenhwa Road, Seatwen, Taichung, Taiwan

    Chi-Wei Lin

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 University Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan

    Toly Chen

Authors
  1. Chi-Wei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toly Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Wei Lin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CW., Chen, T. 3D printing technologies for enhancing the sustainability of an aircraft manufacturing or MRO company—a multi-expert partial consensus-FAHP analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 4171–4180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03998-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03998-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation