Abstract
Conventional volumetric error compensation strategies for five-axis machines directly generate compensation values without considering the RTCP (rotation tool center point) effects, which causes additional movements of translational axes with the movement of rotary axes, so the compensation values for three linear axes need to be recalculated. In this paper, a volumetric error compensation model considering RTCP is proposed. In the model, the compensation values for translational axes totally consist of three parts, i.e., position errors caused by the volumetric error, position variations caused by the compensation of rotary axes, and caused by RTCP. Firstly, the compensation values for rotary axes are obtained based on the volumetric error model and the inverse kinematics. Then, the compensation values for three linear axes are calculated in detail based on the compensation values of rotary axes and RTCP effects. Finally, ballbar tests of a cone-frustum toolpath are selected to verify the proposed compensation model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xiang S, Li H, Deng M, Li H, Yang J (2018) Geometric error identification and compensation for non-orthogonal five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2915–2929
Xiang S, Altintas Y (2016) Modeling and compensation of volumetric errors for five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 101:65–78
Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2014) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):2071–2082
Xiang S, Yang J (2014) Using a double ball bar to measure 10 position-dependent geometric errors for rotary axes on five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1–4):559–572
Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R, Delbressine F (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—an update. CIRP Ann 57(2):660–675
Ibaraki S, Kudo T, Yano T, Takatsuji T, Osaw S, Sato O (2015) Estimation of three-dimensional volumetric errors of machining centers by a tracking interferometer. Precis Eng 39:179–186
Ibaraki S, Sato G, Takeuchi K (2014) ‘Open-loop’tracking interferometer for machine tool volumetric error measurement—two-dimensional case. Precis Eng 38(3):666–672
Givi M, Mayer J (2014) Validation of volumetric error compensation for a five-axis machine using surface mismatch producing tests and on-machine touch probing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 87:89–95
Lei W, Hsu Y (2003) Accuracy enhancement of five-axis CNC machines through real-time error compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(9):871–877
Hsu Y, Wang S (2007) A new compensation method for geometry errors of five-axis machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):352–360
Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Jiang L, Zhuang L, Yan K et al (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29
Huang N, Jin Y, Bi Q, Wang Y (2015) Integrated post-processor for 5-axis machine tools with geometric errors compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 94:65–73
Liu Y, Wan M, Xing W, Xiao Q, Zhang W (2018) Generalized actual inverse kinematic model for compensating geometric errors in five-axis machine tools. Int J Mech Sci 145:299–317
Yang J, Mayer J, Altintas Y (2015) A position independent geometric errors identification and correction method for five-axis serial machines based on screw theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 95:52–66
Yang J, Ding H (2016) A new position independent geometric errors identification model of five-axis serial machine tools based on differential motion matrices. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 104:68–77
Fu G, Fu J, Xu Y, Chen Z, Lai J (2015) Accuracy enhancement of five-axis machine tool based on differential motion matrix: geometric error modeling, identification and compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:170–181
Qiao Y, Chen Y, Yang J, Chen B (2017) A five-axis geometric errors calibration model based on the common perpendicular line (CPL) transformation using the product of exponentials (POE) formula. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 118:49–60
ISO-230-7:2006,Test code for machine tools—Part7: Geometric accuracy of axes of rotation
Kato N, Tsutsumi M, Sato R (2013) Analysis of circular trajectory equivalent to cone-frustum milling in five-axis machining centers using motion simulator. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:1–11
Funding
This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705262), Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (2018A610147), Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration (MSV201911), Chinese National Science and Technology Key Special Projects (2015ZX04005001), and the K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiang, S., Deng, M., Li, H. et al. Volumetric error compensation model for five-axis machine tools considering effects of rotation tool center point. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 4371–4382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03497-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03497-5