Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated decision models for a vendor–buyer supply chain with inspection errors and purchase and repair options

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the performance of supply chains is imperative in the contemporary competitive business environment. Integrated decision models incorporating various important aspects and decision variables into a single model are desired towards this end. An important issue lacking in the supply chain literature relates to the incorporation of such quintessential and omnipresent supply chain practices as repairing or replacing non-conforming items supplied by the vendor. Specifically, this paper proposes two integrated models. The first model incorporates the notion of repairing non-conforming items supplied by the vendor at the site of the buyer/manufacturer. The second model incorporates the notion of replacing non-conforming items supplied by the vendor through local purchases at the site of the buyer/manufacturer. Illustrative examples and sensitivity analyses are provided to demonstrate the model application, efficacy, and managerial insights. Some very interesting and challenging future research directions are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad A (1997) Integrated mathematical models for production, quality, & maintenance in multi-stage production-inventory systems. MS Thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia

  2. Ben-Daya M (1999) Multi-stage lot sizing models with imperfect processes and inspection errors. Production Planning & Control 10:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Daya M, Darwish M, Rahim A (2003) Two-stage imperfect production systems with inspection errors. Int J Oper Quantitative Manage 9:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Daya M, Rahim A (2003) Optimal lot-sizing, quality improvement and inspection errors for multistage production systems. Int J Prod Res 41:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cárdenas-Barrón LE (2012) A complement to “a comprehensive note on: an economic order quantity with imperfect quality and quantity discounts”. Appl Math Model 36:6338–6340

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang H (2011) A comprehensive note on: an economic order quantity with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Appl Math Model 35:5208–5216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiu YP (2003) Determining the optimal lot size for the finite production model with random defective rate, the rework process, and backlogging. Eng Optim 35:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung K (2013) The EOQ model with defective items and partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity derived analytically in the supply chain management. Appl Math Model 37:2317–2326

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffuaa S, Khan M (2002) An optimal repeat inspection plan with several classifications. J Oper Res Soc 53:1016–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris FW (1990) How many parts to make at once. Oper Res 38:947–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerchak Y, Vickson RG, Parlar M (1988) Periodic review production models with variable yield and uncertain demand∗. IIE Trans 20:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goyal SK, Cárdenas-Barrón LE (2002) Note on: economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality—a practical approach. Int J Prod Econ 77:85–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goyal SK, Huang C, Chen K (2003) A simple integrated production policy of an imperfect item for vendor and buyer. Prod Plan Cont 14:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu J, Hsu L (2013) An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns. Int J Prod Econ 143:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang C (2004) An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production–inventory problem with process unreliability consideration. Int J Prod Econ 91:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaber MY, Zanoni S, Zavanella LE (2014) Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options. Int J Prod Econ 155:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaber M, Goyal S, Imran M (2008) Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality subject to learning effects. Int J Prod Econ 115:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan M, Jaber M, Wahab M (2010) Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection. Int J Prod Econ 124:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan M, Jaber MY, Bonney M (2011) An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors. Int J Prod Econ 133:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan M, Jaber M, Guiffrida A (2012) The effect of human factors on the performance of a two level supply chain. Int J Prod Res 50:517–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan M, Jaber M, Guiffrida A, Zolfaghari S (2011) A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items. Int J Prod Econ 132:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan M, Jaber MY, Ahmad A (2014) An integrated supply chain model with errors in quality inspection and learning in production. Omega 42:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HL, Rosenblatt MJ (1987) Simultaneous determination of production cycle and inspection schedules in a production system. Manag Sci 33:1125–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao J (2007) A note on an EOQ model for deteriorating items under supplier credit linked to ordering quantity. Appl Math Model 31:1690–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin T (2010) An economic order quantity with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Appl Math Model 34:3158–3165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Nodem FID, Kenne J, Gharbi A (2011) Production planning and repair/replacement switching policy for deteriorating manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manf Tech 57:827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Papachristos S, Konstantaras I (2006) Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality. Int J Prod Econ 100:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Porteus EL (1986) Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Oper Res 34:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rahim M (1985) Economic model of X-chart under non-normality and measurement errors. Comput Oper Res 12:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Raouf A, Jain J, Sathe P (1983) A cost-minimization model for multicharacteristic component inspection. AIIE Trans 15:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenblatt MJ, Lee HL (1986) Economic production cycles with imperfect production processes. IIE Trans 18:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salameh M, Jaber M (2000) Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. Int J Prod Econ 64:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shapiro JF (2006) Modeling the supply chain. Nelson Education

  34. Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-levi E (2003) Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies and case studies. McGraw Hills, Mass

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou Y, Chen J, Wu Y, Zhou W (2014) EPQ models for items with imperfect quality and one-time-only discount. Appl Math Model 39:1000–1018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmood Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M., Ahmad, AR. & Hussain, M. Integrated decision models for a vendor–buyer supply chain with inspection errors and purchase and repair options. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 3221–3228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1137-9

Keywords

Navigation