Skip to main content
Log in

Tool posture dependent chatter suppression in five-axis milling of thin-walled workpiece with ball-end cutter

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In aerospace industry, five-axis ball-end milling is widely used for flexible thin-walled aerospace parts by considering the process mechanics. A new analytical method is proposed to investigate the effects of the change of tool posture, especially lead and tilt angle, on chatter stability in milling. In this method, the dynamic cutter-workpiece engagement regions, which are essential to predict dynamic cutting forces and investigate chatter stability of the thin-walled workpiece, are determined considering the dynamic machining conditions. Then, according to dynamic cutter-workpiece engagement region data, the dynamic cutting force model considering the effects of lead and tilt angle is developed in machining the thin-walled aerospace parts with ball-end cutter. Subsequently, the milling chatter stability model is established based on the dynamic cutting force model, and the milling stability limits are determined in different lead and tilt angles. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified by experiments with ball-end cutter in five-axis machining center. The results are shown that the predicted values well match with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang X, Zhang J, Pang B, Zhao WH (2016) An accurate prediction method of cutting forces in 5-axis flank milling of sculptured surface. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 104:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li ZL, Wang XZ, Zhu LM (2016) Arc–surface intersection method to calculate cutter–workpiece engagements for generic cutter in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 73:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta SK, Saini SK, Spranklin BW, Yao Z (2005) Geometric algorithms for computing cutter engagement functions in 2.5 D milling operations. Comput Aided Des 37(14):1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2014) An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 55(3):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tunc L, Budak E (2009) Extraction of 5-axis milling conditions from CAM data for process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(5):538–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Budak E, Ozturk E, Tunc LT (2009) Modeling and simulation of 5-axis milling processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aras E, Feng HY (2011) Vector model-based workpiece update in multi-axis milling by moving surface of revolution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(52):913–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang LQ (2011) Process modeling and toolpath optimization for five-axis ball-end milling based on tool motion analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(9–12):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei ZC, Wang MJ, Cai YJ, Wang SF (2013) Prediction of cutting force in ball-end milling of sculptured surface using improved Z-map. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5):1167–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2015) A hybrid analytical- and discrete-based methodology for determining cutter-workpiece engagement in five-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9):2083–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boz Y, Erdim H, Lazoglu I (2015) A comparison of solid model and three-orthogonal dexelfield methods for cutter-workpiece engagement calculations in three- and five-axis virtual milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5):811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aras E, Albedah A (2014) Extracting cutter/workpiece engagements in five-axis milling using solid modeler. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9):1351–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Zhang WH, Wan M, Ma YC (2013) A solid trimming method to extract cutter–workpiece engagement maps for multi-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9):2801–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ju GG, Song QH, Liu ZQ, Shi JH, Wan Y (2015) A solid-analytical-based method for extracting cutter-workpiece engagement in sculptured surface milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5):1297–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozturk E, Tunc LT, Budak E (2009) Investigation of lead and tilt angle effects in 5-axis ball-end milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(14):1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk E, Budak E (2010) Dynamics and stability of five-axis ball-end milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 132(2):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozturk E, Budak E (2010) Tool orientation effects on the geometry of 5-axis ball-end milling. Proceedings of the 36th International MATADOR Conference, 243–246. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84996-432-6_56.

  18. Shamoto E, Akazawa K (2009) Analytical prediction of chatter stability in ball end milling with tool inclination. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):351–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shamoto E, Fujimaki S, Sencer B, Suzuki N, Kato T, Hino R (2012) A novel tool path/posture optimization concept to avoid chatter vibration in machining—proposed concept and its verification in turning. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elk S, Yigit IE, Lazoglu I (2015) Analysis of tool orientation for 5-axis ball-end milling of flexible parts. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(1):97–100

  21. Geng L, Liu PL, Liu K (2015) Optimization of cutter posture based on cutting force prediction for five-axis machining with ball-end cutters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5):1289–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun C, Altintas Y (2016) Chatter free tool orientations in 5-axis ball-end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 106:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aras E (2008) Cutter-workpiece engagement identification in multi-axis milling. Dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver

  24. Lazoglu I, Boz Y, Erdim H (2011) Five-axis milling mechanics for complex free form surfaces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Altintas Y, Lee P (1998) Mechanics and dynamics of ball end milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 120(4):684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Altintas Y (2000) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Montgomery D, Altintas Y (1991) Mechanism of cutting force and surface generation in dynamic milling. J Eng Ind 113(2):160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozturk E, Ozlu E, Budak E (2007) Modeling dynamics and stability of 5-axis milling processes, in: Proceedings of the 10th CIRP Workshop on Modeling of Machining Operations, Calabria, Italy, 27–28 p469–476.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junjin Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, J., Zhang, D., Liu, Y. et al. Tool posture dependent chatter suppression in five-axis milling of thin-walled workpiece with ball-end cutter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 287–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9748-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9748-0

Keywords

Navigation