Skip to main content
Log in

Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Convex and concave inclined surfaces are frequently encountered in the machining of components in industries such as aerospace, aircraft, automotive, biomedical, and precision machinery manufacturing and mold industries. Tool path styles, generated by different cutting strategies, result in various cutting forces and tool deflection values that might lead to poor surface integrities. In cost-effective manufacturing, it is helpful to make known their effects on machinability. Thus, the first aim of this study is to investigate optimum cutting parameter values in ball end milling of EN X40CrMoV5-1 tool steel with three coated cutters. The parameters taken into consideration are cutting speed, feed rate, step over, and tool path style. The second aim of the study is to determine the effects of tool path styles in ball end milling of inclined surfaces. As a result, the most effective parameter within the selected cutting parameters and cutting styles for both inclined surfaces and different coatings was step over. In terms of tool coatings, the most rapidly deteriorating coating was TiC coating for cutting forces in both inclined surfaces and for tool deflection in convex inclined surface. In addition, the response surface methodology is employed to predict surface roughness values, depending on the cutting forces obtained. The model generated gives highly accurate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gok A, Gologlu C, Demirci HI, Kurt M (2012) Determination of surface qualities on inclined surface machining with acoustic sound pressure. Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering 58–10:587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw MC (2005) Metal cutting principles, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  3. Trent EM, Wright P (2000) Metal cutting, 4th edn. Butterworths, London

  4. Zhou JM, Andersson M, Ståhl JE (2004) Identification of cutting errors in precision hard turning process. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gologlu C, Sakarya N (2008) The effects of cutter path strategies on surface roughness of pocket milling of 1.2738 steel based on Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 206:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang JL, Chen JC (2001) A systematic approach for identifying optimum surface roughness performance in end-milling operations. J Ind Technol 17(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang WH, Tarng YS (1998) Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 84:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurt M, Bagci E, Kaynak Y (2009) Application of Taguchi methods in the optimization of cutting parameters for surface finish and hole diameter accuracy in dry drilling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:458–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrari F, Elbestawi MA (1997) Closed form formulation of cutting forces for ball and flat end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 33:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang T, Whitehouse DJ (1999) Cutting force formulation of taper end mills using differential geometry. Precis Eng 23:196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shatla M, Altan T (2000) Analytical modeling of drilling and ball end milling. J Mater Process Technol 98:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikua BW, Tanaka H, Obata F, Sakamoto S (2001) Prediction of cutting forces and machining error in ball end milling of curved surfaces—I: theoretical analysis. Precis Eng 25:266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim GM, Kim BH, Chu CN (2003) Estimation of cutter deflection and form error in ball end milling processes. Machine Tools & Manufacture 43:917–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikua BW, Tanaka H, Obata F, Sakamoto S, Kishi T, Ishii T (2002) Prediction of cutting forces and machining error in ball end milling of curved surfaces—II: experimental verification. Precis Eng 26:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacalle LNL, Lamikiz A, Sanchez JA, Salgado MA (2004) Effects of tool deflection in the high-speed milling of inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryu S, Lee H, Chu N (2003) The form error prediction in side wall machining considering tool deflection. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:1405–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rao VS, Rao PVM (2006) Tool deflection compensation in peripheral milling of curved geometries. International Journal Of Machine Tools & Manufacture 46:2036–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aoyama H, Ishii T (2004) Sensor to detect cutting force components, cutting torque, and cutting tool deflections. J Manuf Process 6(2):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Depince P, Hascoet Y (2006) Active integration of tool deflection effects in end milling. Part 2. Compensation of tool deflection. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:945–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Habibi M, Arezoo B, Nojedeh MV (2011) Tool deflection and geometrical error compensation by tool path modification. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 51:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Subrahmanyam KVR, San WY, Soon HG, Sheng H (2010) Cutting force prediction for ball nose milling of inclined surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1–4):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nicola GL, Missell FP, Zeilmann RP (2010) Surface quality in milling of hardened H13 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(1–4):53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

  24. Trent EM (1989) Metal cutting. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. El-Tamimi AM, El-Hossainy TM (2008) Investigating the machinability of AISI 420 stainless steel using factorial design. Mater Manuf Process 23(4):419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozlu E, Budak E, Molinari A (1999) Analytical and experimental investigation of rake contact and friction behaviour in metal cutting. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufature 49:865–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ding T, Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhu X (2010) Empirical models and optimal cutting parameters for cutting forces and surface roughness in hard milling of AISI H13 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1–4):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Balta S (2007) Robust design of a breast scintigraphy collimator using Monte Carlo simulations and response surface methodology. Master’s thesis, Bogaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey

  29. Kadirgama K, Abou-El-Hossein KA, Mohammad B, AL-Ani H, Noor MM (2008) Cutting force prediction model by FEA and RSM when machining Hastelloy C-22HS with 90° holder. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 67:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  30. Montgomery DC (2000) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ross PJ (1996) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York. ISBN 0-07-114663-6:1-73

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Gok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gok, A., Gologlu, C. & Demirci, H.I. Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69, 1063–1078 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x

Keywords

Navigation