Abstract
This paper presents a methodology for the inclusion of an automated measuring station in an existing flexible manufacturing system (FMS) by treating the measuring station as a workstation integrated into the FMS. This approach causes minimal distortion of the FMS work functions and does not depend on the control algorithms implemented on the system. A case study based on an FMS located at the Aeronautical Centre is presented. The FMS used in the case study is called CFF-ETSIA. This system contains the main elements needed in a FMS: two computer numerical control machine tools for machining and two industrial robots for handling and manipulating. The measuring station in the case study is implemented with one of the robots used to perform the necessary actions of measurement and manipulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williamson T (1967) System 24. A new concept of manufacture Proc 8th Int Mach Tools Des & Res (MTDR) Conf. Pergamon Press, London, pp 327–376
Blomquist RE, Reynolds CR (1976) Pallet Shuttle System. White-Sundstrand Machine Tool Inc. US Patent 4278381, 14 Jul 1981
Piplani R, Wetjens D (2007) Evaluation of entropy-based dispatching in flexible manufacturing systems. Eur J Op Res 176(1):317–331. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.066
Kumar A, Prakash TMK, Shankar R, Baveja A (2006) Solving machine-loading problem of a flexible manufacturing system with constraint-based genetic algorithm. Eur J Op Res 175(2):1043–1069. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.025
Zeballos LJ (2010) A constraint programming approach to tool allocation and production scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems. Rob Comp Integ Manuf 26(6):725–743. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2010.04.005
Youssef MA, Al-Ahmady B (2002) Quality management practices in a flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) environment. Tot Qual Manag 13(6):877–890. doi:10.1080/0954412022000010217
Wang JW, Li JS, Arinez J, Biller S, Huang NJ (2010) Quality analysis in flexible manufacturing systems with batch productions: performance evaluation and nonmonotonic properties. IEEE Trans Aut Sci Eng 7(3):671–676. doi:10.1109/tase.2009.2029077
Rezaie K, Ostadi B (2007) A mathematical model for optimal and phased implementation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. App Math Comp 184:729–736
Rubio EM, Sanz A, Sebastián MA (2005) Virtual reality applications for the next generation manufacturing. Int J Comp Int Manuf 7:601–609
Turgay S (2009) Agent-based FMS control. Rob Comp Int Manuf 25(2):470–480
Chan FTS, Bhagwatz R, Wadhwa S (2008) Comparative performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS):a review-period-based control. Int J Prod Res 46:1–24
Piroddi L, Cossalter M, Ferrarini L (2009) A resource decoupling approach for deadlock prevention in FMS. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 40(1–2):157–170
Caumond A, Lacomme P, Moukrim A, Tchernev N (2009) An MILP for scheduling problems in an FMS with one vehicle. Eur J Op Res 199(3):706–722
Kusiak A (1986) Flexible manufacturing systems: Methods and studies ISBN‑13: 9780444879219. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam
Sanz A (1985) Simulation and optimization of flexible manufacturing systems Ph D Thesis. Dpt Tecnología Mecánica, ETSII-UPM, Madrid
Bhattacharya A, Abraham A, Vasant P, Grosan C (2007) Evolutionary artificial neural network for selecting flexible manufacturing systems under disparate level-of-satisfaction of decision maker. Int J Innov Comp Inf Con 3(1):131–140
Shiue YR, Su CT (2002) Attribute selection for neural network-based adaptive scheduling systems in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 20(7):532–544
Prakash A, Chan FTS, Deshrnukh SG (2011) FMS scheduling with knowledge based genetic algorithm approach. Exp Sys App 38(4):3161–3171. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.002
Yogeswaran M, Ponnambalam SG, Tiwari MK (2009) An efficient hybrid evolutionary heuristic using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm to solve machine loading problem in FMS. Int J Prod Res 47(19):5421–5448. doi:10.1080/00207540801910429
Hsu T, Korbaa O, Dupas R, Goncalves G (2008) Cyclic scheduling for FMS: modelling and evolutionary solving approach. Eur J Op Res 191(2):463–483
Lu MS, Liu YJ (2011) Dynamic dispatching for a flexible manufacturing system based on fuzzy logic. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 54(9-12):1057–1065. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2993-8
Mehrabad MS, Anvari M (2010) Provident decision making by considering dynamic and fuzzy environment for FMS evaluation. Int J Prod Res 48(15):4555–4584
Chen YF, Li ZW, Khalgui M, Mosbahi O (2011) Design of a maximally permissive liveness-enforcing petri net supervisor for flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans Aut Sci Eng 8(2):374–393. doi:10.1109/tase.2010.2060332
Li SY, Li ZW, Hu HS (2011) Siphon extraction for deadlock control in flexible manufacturing systems by using Petri nets. Int J Comp Integ Manuf 24(8):710–725. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2011.575182
Yasuda G (2011) Model based design and implementation of hierarchical and distributed control for robotic flexible manufacturing cells using Petri nets. In: Chen R (ed) Mechatronics and intelligent materials, pts 1 and 2. Adv Mat Res 211–212: 856–860
Prakash A, Tiwari MK, Shankar R (2008) Optimal job sequence determination and operation machine allocation in flexible manufacturing systems: an approach using adaptive hierarchical ant colony algorithm. J Intel Manuf 19(2):161–173. doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0071-y
Udhayakumar P, Kumanan S (2010) Sequencing and scheduling of job and tool in a flexible manufacturing system using ant colony optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 50(9-12):1075–1084. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2583-9
Sanz A, González I, García del Valle I, Tobaruela E (1994) La célula flexible de fabricación ETSIA-CFF. Anales de Ingeniería Mecánica 10(3):127–134
ACL. Automated control language. (1998) Rev. 1.43. Eshed Robotec. www.intelitek.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanz, A., González, I., Casado, J. et al. A methodology for the implementation of automated measuring stations in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66, 1065–1073 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4389-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4389-4