Skip to main content
Log in

Early castability evaluation using analytical hierarchy process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design for manufacture usually implies applying various guidelines derived from previous experience to improve part design so it is more compatible with the capabilities of the selected process, resulting in better quality and lower cost. The guidelines can be formulated as dimensionless criteria, enabling quantitative evaluation of a particular aspect of part design. There is, however, no good way to compare two or more designs for all aspects, considering that they may not be equally important. In this work, we employ analytical hierarchy process to determine the relative weights of various criteria for castability evaluation. The criteria are categorised in a three-level hierarchy, with the middle level comprising mould, feeding and gating groups. The prioritisation of criteria along with consistency checking of pair-wise comparisons enables a systematic evaluation of alternative product designs for manufacturability. The methodology is illustrated by modifying the product and tooling design of a grey iron bracket casting and estimating the improvement in manufacturability. The results are supported by experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreasen MM, Hein L (1997) Integrated product development. IFS, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Magrab E (1997) Integrated product and process design and development. CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASM (1962) Casting design handbook. American Society of Metals, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steel Founders’ Society of America (1973) Risering steel castings. http://www.sfsa.org/

  5. ASM (1990) Metal handbook volume 15 casting. American Society of Metals, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bralla J (1990) Handbook of product design for manufacturing. McGraw-Hill Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell J (2004) Castings practice the 10 rules of casting. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravi B (2005) Metal casting—computer aided design and analysis. Prentice Hall, India

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta SK, Regli WC, Das D, Nau DS (1997) Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Res Eng Design—Theory Appl Concurrent Eng 9(3):p168–p190

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ravi B, Srinivasan MN (1995) Features-based castability evaluation. Int J Prod Res 33(12):p3367–p3380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty T (1994) Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 74(3):426–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Saaty T (1994) How to make decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Akarte M, Surendra N, Ravi B, Rangraj N (2001) Web-based casting supplier evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 52:p511–p522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiwari M, Banerjee R (2001) A decision support system for the selection of a casting process using analytic hierarchy process. Prod Plan Control 12(7):p689–p694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chougule RG, Ravi B (2005) Variant process planning of casting using AHP-based nearest neighbor algorithm for case retrieval. Int J Prod Res 43(6):1255–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ravi B, Srinivasan MN (1996) Casting solidification analysis by modulus vector method. Int J Cast Met Res 9:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ravi B, Creese RC, Ramesh D (1999) Design for casting—a new paradigm for preventing potential problems. Trans Am Foundry Soc 107:p197–p202

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ravi B, Joshi D (2007) Feedability analysis and optimization driven by casting simulation. Indian Foundry J 53(6):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ravi B, Joshi D, Kamalesh S. (2008) Part, tooling and method optimization driven by simulation and cost model. 68th World Foundry Congress, Chennai, Feb 7–10, pp 261–266

  20. Joshi D, Ravi B (2008) Comparison of finite element method and vector element method for casting solidification simulation. Indian Foundry J 54(9):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joshi D, Ravi B (2009) Classification and simulation based design of 3D junctions in castings. Trans Am Foundry Soc 117:p7–p22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Durgesh Joshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, D., Ravi, B. Early castability evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50, 21–36 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2517-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2517-6

Keywords

Navigation