Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A decision-support framework for agile enterprise partnering

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Being an essential part of an agile supply-chain management and focusing on selecting business partners, agile enterprise partnering is regarded as a key activity that can make a significant contribution to the development of a successful supply chain. This paper proposes a decision-support framework for the evaluation and selection of business partners in order to help the industry form agile supply chains. Based on literature review and empirical studies, the proposed framework organizes 32 agility criteria into ten decision domains according to their inherent characteristics. The identified criteria and decision domains form a hierarchy that acts as an agile partner-assessment model. In order to provide empirical evidence for the proposed model, a case study is conducted. Using the data collected from site visits and interviews, the weight values of decision domains and criteria are determined via a pairwise comparison method. Considering the incomplete and vague nature of the collected data, an evidential reasoning and synthesis approach is employed to conduct multi-criteria and multi-level synthesis. The advantages of the proposed methodology and methods are demonstrated by the case study results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shin H, Collier DA, Wilson DD (2000) Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. J Oper Manage 18:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yusuf YY, Sarhadi M, Gunasekaran A (1999) Agile manufacturing: concepts, drivers and assessment. Int J Prod Econ 62:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ren J, Yusuf YY, Burns ND (2002) Exploring the relationship between agile enterprise attributes and competitive bases using correspondence analysis. Int J Agile Manuf 4(2):85–98

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ren J, Yusuf YY, Burns ND (2003) The effects of agile attributes on competitive capabilities: a neural network approach. Int J Integr Manuf Syst 14(6):489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren J, Yusuf YY, Burns ND (2005) Agile partner selection: a hierarchical model and empirical investigation. Int J Inf Syst Sci 1:1–23

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ren J, Yusuf YY, Burns ND (2006) Using mobile agent to design intelligent enterprise performance measurement system. Int J Inf Syst Sci 3:375–383

    Google Scholar 

  7. Council of Logistics Management (CLM) (2000) What it’s all about. Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organisations: strategies for enriching the customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yusuf YY, Ren J, Gunasekaran A (2000) An integrated framework for agility-based decision-making system. The 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing Processes and Systems. MIT, Boston, pp 54–61

  10. Ramesh G, Devadasan SR (2007) Literature review on the agile manufacturing criteria. J Manuf Technol Manage 18(2):182–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Naylor JB, Naim MM, Berry D (1999) Legality: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 62(1–2):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mason-Jones R, Naylor B, Towill DR (2000) Engineering the leagile supply chain. Int J Agile Manage Syst 2(1):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christopher ML (2000) The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Ind Mark Manage 29:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Talluri S, Baker RC, Sarkis J (1999) A framework for designing efficient value chain networks - Derivations, meanings and uses. Int J Prod Econ 62:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Min S, Mentzer JT (2004) Developing and measuring supply chain concepts. J Bus Logist 25(1):63–99

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hull B (2005) The role of elasticity in supply chain performance. Int J Prod Econ 98(3):301–314

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Swafford P, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2005) A model of global supply chain agility and its impact on competitive performance, work paper, Georgia University, USA

  18. Fisher ML (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus Rev 75(2):105–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Angeles R, Nath R (2000) An empirical study of EDI trading partner selection criteria in customer-supplier relationships. Inf Manage 37:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coricelli G, Fehr D, Fellner D (2004) Partner selection in public goods experiments. J Conflict Resolut 48(3):356–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tin SC (2004) A multi-objective approach to purchasing decision and supplier selection in the supply chain, MCDM 2004, Whistler, B. C., Canada, August 6–11

  22. Tatoglu E (2000) Western joint ventures in Turkey: strategic motives and partner selection criteria. Eur Bus Rev 12:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marlow WH (1993) Mathematics for operations research. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowen R (1999) Categorical methods and techniques in fuzzy mathematics. Fuzzy Sets Syst 104(3):357–357

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Soukup WR (1987) Supplier selection strategies. J Purch Mater Manage 23:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson KN (1990) Supplier profile analysis. J Purch Mater Manage 26:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang JB, Singh MG (1994) An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision-making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang JB, Xu DL (1998) Knowledge-based executive car evaluation using the evidential reasoning approach. Paper for the National Conference on Manufacturing Research, 7–9 September, Derby, England

  29. Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Manage Sci 32(7):841–855

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang JB, Xu DL (2002) On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A, Syst Humans 32(3):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK

    J. Ren

  2. Lancashire Business School, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK

    Y. Y. Yusuf

  3. Department of Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK

    N. D. Burns

Authors
  1. J. Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Y. Yusuf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. D. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, J., Yusuf, Y.Y. & Burns, N.D. A decision-support framework for agile enterprise partnering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41, 180–192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1443-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1443-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation