Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional printing improves osteochondral allograft placement in complex cases

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing has seen a vast expansion over recent years, with an increased application for its use in orthopaedics. This report details the use of 3D printing technology to aid in the treatment of a medial femoral condyle osteochondral defect in a 26-year-old female who had previously undergone a failed autograft procedure. A preoperative computed tomography scan of the knee and chondral defect was used to generate a 3D printed, one-to-one scale replica of the distal femur. This replica was then used to size a patient-specific allograft plug for the osteochondral transplantation procedure. The patient recovered well, and 1 year postoperatively the allograft was well incorporated into the medial femoral condyle and healed. This report illustrates the advantages of using a 3D printed model to allow for tactile feedback and improved visualization that will allow for improved understanding of complex surgical procedures.

Level of evidence V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Salam A, Eyres KS (1995) Effects of tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:250–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedi A, Feeley BT, Williams RJ, 3rd (2010) Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellanova L, Paul L, Docquier PL (2013) Surgical guides (patient-specific instruments) for pediatric tibial bone sarcoma resection and allograft reconstruction. Sarcoma 2013:787653

  4. Borazjani BH, Chen AC, Bae WC et al (2006) Effect of impact on chondrocyte viability during insertion of human osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1934–1943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu CR, Convery FR, Akeson WH, Meyers M, Amiel D (1999) Articular cartilage transplantation. Clinical results in the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 360:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emmerson BC, Gortz S, Jamali AA, Chung C, Amiel D, Bugbee WD (2007) Fresh osteochondral allografting in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle. Am J Sports Med 35:907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garrett JC (1994) Fresh osteochondral allografts for treatment of articular defects in osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 303:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris JD, Brophy RH, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2010) Treatment of chondral defects in the athlete’s knee. Arthroscopy 26:841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurson C, Tansey A, O’Donnchadha B, Nicholson P, Rice J, McElwain J (2007) Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury 38:1158–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaberi FM (2002) Osteochondritis dissecans of the weight-bearing surface of the medial femoral condyle in adults. Knee 9:201–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koh JL, Wirsing K, Lautenschlager E, Zhang LO (2004) The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 32:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lattermann C, Romine SE (2009) Osteochondral allografts: state of the art. Clin Sports Med 28:285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma L, Zhou Y, Zhu Y et al (2016) 3D-printed guiding templates for improved osteosarcoma resection. Sci Rep 6:23335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A et al (2015) Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics 35:1965–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pallante AL, Chen AC, Ball ST et al (2012) The in vivo performance of osteochondral allografts in the goat is diminished with extended storage and decreased cartilage cellularity. Am J Sports Med 40:1814–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pascual-Garrido C, McNickle AG, Cole BJ (2009) Surgical treatment options for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Sports Health 1:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H et al (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:335–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherman SL, Garrity J, Bauer K, Cook J, Stannard J, Bugbee W (2014) Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for the knee: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:121–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelechi R. Okoroha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No authors have any financial disclosures.

Ethical approval

The local institutional review board approved this study (IRB: Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI).

Informed consent

A signed formed consent was obtained from the patient allowing publication of this case report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okoroha, K.R., Evans, T.J., Stephens, J.P. et al. Three-dimensional printing improves osteochondral allograft placement in complex cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 3601–3605 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4849-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4849-y

Keywords

Navigation