Skip to main content
Log in

Remnant-preserving and re-tensioning technique to cover the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

This study set out to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and the extent of synovial coverage on second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a remnant-preserving and re-tensioning technique to easily cover the graft with a remnant.

Methods

Forty-three subjects with ACL rupture underwent remnant-preserving and re-tensioning ACL reconstruction using a free tendon Achilles allograft between 2011 and 2013. The clinical outcomes were assessed by Lysholm knee score, Lachman stress test, pivot shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) classification, and Tegner Activity Scale score. Side-to-side difference (SSD) was assessed on stress radiographs. The extent of synovialization was evaluated on second-look arthroscopy.

Results

The mean Lysholm score was 54 ± 11 before surgery and 94 ± 5 at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). On Lachman stress test, 42 subjects had grade 0 or 1 on the Lachman stress test, and 42 had grade 0 or 1 on the pivot shift test. Forty-one subjects had IKDC classification A or B; two were classified as C or D. The median Tegner Activity Scale score was 6.5 (range 5–9) before injury and 6 (range 4–8) at the last follow-up (p = 0.048). Mean SSD on stress radiographs was 9.9 ± 2.6 mm preoperatively and 1.0 ± 1.7 mm at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). In the assessment of the extent of synovial coverage of the graft, 39 subjects were in group 1 (>75 %) for synovial coverage of the graft, three were in group 2 (50–75 %), and one was in group 4 (≤25 %).

Conclusions

The remnant-preserving and re-tensioning technique resulted in satisfying short-term results clinically and radiologically and good synovial coverage on second-look arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K, Kuriwaka M (2002) Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthop Scand 73(3):330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Ha HC (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring autograft: technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(8):1011–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Lee SH (2014) Creation of an anatomic femoral tunnel with minimal damage to the remnant bundle in remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an outside-in technique. Arthrosc Tech 3(1):e175–e179. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2013.09.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnoczky SP (1983) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 172:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bali K, Dhillon MS, Vasistha RK, Kakkar N, Chana R, Prabhakar S (2012) Efficacy of immunohistological methods in detecting functionally viable mechanoreceptors in the remnant stumps of injured anterior cruciate ligaments and its clinical importance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(1):75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett DS (1991) Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):833–837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong L, Li X, Zhang H, Liu X, Zhang J, Shen JW, Feng H (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2747–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu J, Qu J, Xu D, Zhang T, Zhou J, Lu H (2014) Clinical outcomes of remnant preserving augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(9):1976–1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Junkin DM Jr, Johnson DL (2008) ACL tibial remnant, to save or not? Orthopedics 31(2):154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC (1982) Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med 10(6):329–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim MK, Lee SR, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Kim SB, Kim JG (2014) Comparison of second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical results according to the amount of preserved remnant in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 21(3):774–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SJ, Jo SB, Kim TW, Chang JH, Choi HS, Oh KS (2009) A modified arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction technique with autogenous quadriceps tendon graft: remnant-preserving technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(3):403–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krauspe R, Schmitz F, Zoller G, Drenckhahn D (1995) Distribution of neurofilament-positive nerve fibres and sensory endings in the human anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114(4):194–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee BI, Kwon SW, Kim JB, Choi HS, Min KD (2008) Comparison of clinical results according to amount of preserved remnant in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 24(5):560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee BI, Min KD, Choi HS, Kim JB, Kim ST (2006) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the tibial-remnant preserving technique using a hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 22(3):340-e1–347-e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC (2014) Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is possible with use of the modified transtibial technique: a comparison with the anteromedial transportal technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(8):664–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(10):2321–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noh JH, Yang BG, Roh YH, Lee JS (2011) Synovialization on second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Achilles allograft in active young men. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(11):1843–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Noh JH, Yoon KH, Song SJ, Roh YH (2014) Re-tensioning technique to cover the graft with remnant in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 3(6):e679–e682. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2014.08.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ochi M, Abouheif MM, Kongcharoensombat W, Nakamae A, Adachi N, Deie M (2011) Double bundle arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preserving technique using a hamstring autograft. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 3:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31(1):83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schutte MJ, Dabezies EJ, Zimny ML, Happel LT (1987) Neural anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(2):243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sherman MF, Lieber L, Bonamo JR, Podesta L, Reiter I (1991) The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med 19(3):243–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song EK, Kim SK, Lim HA, Seon JK (2014) Comparisons of tunnel-graft angle and tunnel length and position between transtibial and transportal techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 38(11):2357–2362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Cao X, Liu L, Liu Y, Li R (2014) The effect of remnant preservation on tibial tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(1):166–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zimny ML, Schutte M, Dabezies E (1986) Mechanoreceptors in the human anterior cruciate ligament. Anat Rec 214(2):204–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by 2014 Research Grant from Kangwon National University (No. 120141480).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Hak Roh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noh, J.H., Kyung, H.S., Roh, Y.H. et al. Remnant-preserving and re-tensioning technique to cover the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 1205–1210 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3854-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3854-7

Keywords

Navigation