Skip to main content
Log in

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To compare outcomes of acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) ligament in professional and non-professional athletes at 2-year minimum follow-up.

Methods

Forty-three patients (men; mean age 30, range 19–54 years) with Rockwood type III to V chronic AC joint dislocations underwent AC joint reconstruction with LARS ligament and standardized rehabilitation. Patients were divided into two groups: professionals (22) and non-professionals (21). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively, at 3- and 24-month follow-up.

Results

All clinical (Oxford and Constant) scores and patient satisfaction improved significantly from preoperative to follow-up intervals (p < 0.00001). However, professionals showed nonsignificant improvements from 3- to 24-month follow-up in Constant. Although groups differed preoperatively in Constant (p = 0.037), they were not different in preoperative-to-postoperative differences in clinical scores, postoperative final satisfaction and median time to return to unrestricted activity [4 (interquartiler range 3–5) months to return to full sport in professionals]. Follow-up radiographs revealed an AC joint ratio (clavicle inferior-to-superior translation as ratio of AC joint height) of 0.09 and 0.16 in 8/22 professionals, 0.19 and 0.31 in 9/21 non-professionals, 0.14 and 0.24 in 17/43 overall patients at 3- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Slight loss of reduction (0.25 < AC joint ratio < 0.50): 21 %. There were no significant clinical–radiographic correlations. Complication: one coracoid fracture at follow-up and one wound infection.

Conclusions

AC joint reconstruction with LARS ligament did not reveal differences in clinical outcomes between groups, with 2 % of failures (re-dislocations) at 2-year minimum follow-up. Superior radiological outcomes in professionals were not correlated to clinical results.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study–prospective comparative study, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bankes MJ, Crossman JE, Emery RJ (1998) A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(2):116–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM (2008) The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury 39(12):1338–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins DN (2009) Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (eds) The shoulder, vol 1. 4th edn. Saunders-Elsevier, pp 453–526

  4. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1999) The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(3):420–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dragoo JL, Braun HJ, Bartlinski SE, Harris AH (2012) Acromioclavicular joint injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004–2005 through 2008–2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med 40(9):2066–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fauci F, Merolla G, Paladini P, Campi F, Porcellini G (2013) Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation with biologic graft vs synthetic ligament: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Orthop Traumatol 14(4):283–290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fialka C, Michlits W, Stampfl P, Oberleitner G, Funovic P, Schmidt W, Aharinejad A, Vécsel V (2005) Biomedical analysis of different operative techniques for complete acromioclavicular joint disruptions. Osteo Trauma Care 13(3):154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flint JH, Wade AM, Giuliani J, Rue JP (2014) Defining the terms acute and chronic in orthopaedic sports injuries: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42(1):235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraschini G, Ciampi P, Scotti C, Ballis R, Peretti GM (2010) Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation: comparison between two surgical procedures for anatomic reconstruction. Injury 41(11):1103–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giannotti S, Dell’osso G, Bugelli G, Cazzella N, Guido G (2013) Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with LARS artificial ligament. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(8):873–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu N, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Zhu Q, Guo Q, Yang D (2013) Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2582-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rios CG, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 35(5):811–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F (2008) Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(10):1153–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simovitch R, Sanders B, Ozbaydar M, Lavery K, Warner JJ (2009) Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(4):207–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tauber M, Gordon K, Koller H, Fox M, Resch H (2009) Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study. Am J Sports Med 37(1):181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trieb K, Blahovec H, Brand G, Sabeti M, Dominkus M, Kotz R (2004) In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligaments. Eur Surg Res 36(3):148–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1995) Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 23(3):324–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Linda Hallam, Federico Raggi, MD and Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina, MD for their help in data management.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 52 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcheggiani Muccioli, G.M., Manning, C., Wright, P. et al. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1961–1967 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3231-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3231-y

Keywords

Navigation