Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in the porcine knee

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Notchplasty is frequently performed by many orthopaedic surgeons during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The effect of notchplasty on tunnel placement and knee biomechanics with ACL reconstruction is not known.

Methods

Twelve (n = 12) porcine knees were tested using a robotic testing system. Four knee states were compared: (1) intact ACL, (2) ACL-deficient, (3) anatomic single bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction and (4) anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with a 5-mm notchplasty. The graft was fixed at 60° of flexion (full extension of porcine knee is 30°) with an 80-N tension. The knees were subjected to two loading conditions: an 89-N anterior tibial load (ATT) and 4 Nm internal (IR) and external tibial (ER) rotational torques. The kinematics and in situ force obtained from the different knee conditions were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences between pre- and post-notchplasty in the ER at 30° and 60° of knee flexion (n.s.). However, a significant difference was found between pre- and post-notchplasty in ATT at 30° and 60° of flexion (p < 0.05). The in situ force in the anatomic SB reconstruction with notchplasty was significant lower than the intact and anatomic reconstructed ACL pre-notchplasty at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). In response to the IR tibial torque, there were significant differences between pre- and post-notchplasty in IR at 60° (p < 0.05) of knee flexion.

Conclusion

Notchplasty had greater effect on anterior stability than rotational stability. This change in knee kinematics could be detrimental to a healing bone graft, ligamentization and could lead to failure of the reconstruction in early post-operative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asahina S, Muneta T, Ezura Y (2000) Notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental animal study. Arthroscopy 16:165–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, O’Loughlin P, Choi D, Citak M, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of tunnel position and graft size in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evaluation of time-zero knee stability. Arthroscopy 27:1543–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bents RT, Jones RC, May DA, Snearly WS (1998) Intercondylar notch encroachment following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Am J Knee Surg 11:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg EE (1991) Assessing arthroscopic notchplasty. Arthroscopy 7:275–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dargel J, Koebke J, Bruggemann GP, Pennig D, Schmidt-Wiethoff R (2009) Tension degradation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with dynamic flexion-extension loading: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Arthroscopy 25:1115–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Debandi A, Maeyama A, Lu S, Hume C, Goto B, Hoshino Y, Smolinski P, Fu F (2011) Biomechanical comparison of three ACL reconstruction in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:728–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N, Sernert N, Kohler K, Karlsson J (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 31:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitch RB, Montgomery RD, Kincaid SA, Hatchcock JT, Milton JL, Garrett PD, Wright JS, Terry GC (1995) The effect of intercondylar notchplasty on the normal canine stifle. Vet Surg 24:156–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleming BC, Abate JA, Peura GD, Beynnon B (2001) The relationship between graft tensioning and the anterior-posterior laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed goat knee. J Orth Res 19:841–844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetery J, Lattermann C (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, Okeke N, Irrgang J (2008) Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med 36:1263–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hame SL, Markolf KL, Hunter DM, Oakes DA, Zoric B (2003) Effects of notchplasty and femoral tunnel position on excursion patterns of an anterior cruciate ligament graft. Arthroscopy 19:340–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herbolt M, Heletta S, Raschke M, Schliemann B, Osada N, Petersen W, Zantop T (2012) Accidental perforation of the lateral femoral cortex in ACL reconstruction: an investigation of mechanical properties of the different fixation techniques. Arthroscopy 28:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoher J, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Fu FJ, Woo SL (2001) The position of the tibia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29:771–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2009) Intercondylar roof impingement pressure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:590–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Stone JD, Fu FH, Woo SL (1997) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 13:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Meiji HA, Fu FH (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 39:2016–2026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kato Y, Ingham SJ, Kramer S, Smolinski P, Saito A, Fu FH (2010) Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato Y, Ingham SJ, Linde-Rosen M, Smolinski P, Horoguchi T, Fu FH (2010) Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lane JG, Daniel DM, Stone ML (1994) Graft impingement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Presentation as an active extension “thunk”. Am J Sports Med 22:415–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. LaPrade RF, Terry GC, Montgomery RD, Curd D, Simmons DJ (1998) Winner of the AlbertTrillat Young Investigator Award. The effects of aggressive notchplasty on the normal knee in dogs. Am J Sports Med 26:193–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann TA, Black KP, Zanotti DJ, Barr M, Teater T (1999) The natural history of the intercondylar notch after notchplasty. Am J Sports Med 27:181–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Markolf KL, Hame SL, Hunter DM, Oakes D, Gause P (2002) Biomechanical effects of femoral notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:83–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. May DA, Snearly WN, Bents R, Jones R (1997) MR imaging findings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of notchplasty. Am J Roentgenol 169:217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan EA, McElroy JJ, DesJardins JD, Anderson DD, Steensen RN (1996) The effect of intercondylar notchplasty on the patellofemoral articulation. Am J Sports Med 24:843–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenberg TD, Deffner KT (1997) ACL reconstruction: semitendinosus tendon is the graft of choice. Orthopedics 20:396–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orth Res 15:285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vavken P, Fleming B, Mastrangelo A, Machan J, Murray M (2012) Biomechanical outcomes after bioenhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are equal in a porcine model. Arthroscopy 28:672–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Eck C, Working Z, Fu F (2012) Current concepts in anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Sportsmed 39:140–148

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang JH, Kim JG, Lee DK, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2011) Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1584–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski R, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani M, Giulio M, Lopormo N, Signorelli C, Bonanzinga T, Musiani C, Vassilis P, Nitri M, Marcacci M (2012) Can the pivot shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:743–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Pedersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Freddie H. Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keklikci, K., Yapici, C., Kim, D. et al. The effect of notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in the porcine knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 1915–1921 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2343-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2343-5

Keywords

Navigation