Skip to main content
Log in

Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Early aseptic loosening is a major complication in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is well accepted that intramedullary stems improve the anchoring of the prosthetic components; however, controversy still exists about the optimal fixation technique of the stems (cementless, hybrid, cemented).

Methods

A literature review was carried out in the main medical databases from 1980 to 04/2010 to evaluate the available literature by evidence-based criteria and to analyse the results of the single studies regarding fixation technique in knee revision arthroplasty.

Results

There are four studies regarding the cementless fixation. Eight studies reported the hybrid technique and five studies the cemented technique. Hybrid and cemented techniques are comparable regarding the survival of arthroplasties, the rate of aseptic loosening and the clinical outcome. However, most studies just show a low level of evidence (LoE III and IV), a small to medium number of cases and a short follow-up.

Conclusion

Based on the current literature, no final statement can be drawn regarding the optimal fixation technique in revision TKA. Future RCTs are needed to enable conclusive statements about the possible advantages and disadvantages of the single fixation techniques, although the clinical implementation often is critical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M, Sawhney J (1999) Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:216–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M, Hopkins S (2004) The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertin KC, Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC (1985) Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:242–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bottner F, Laskin R, Windsor RE, Haas SB (2006) Hybrid component fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burnett RS, Keeney JA, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis. Iowa Orthop J 29:28–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns AW, Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH (2006) Cost effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chon JG, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR (2004) Hybrid stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Surg Technol Int 12:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Completo A, Fonseca F, Simoes JA (2008) Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study. J Biomech 41:560–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Completo A, Rego A, Fonseca F, Ramos A, Relvas C, Simoes JA (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: an in vitro and finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:159–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Completo A, Simoes JA, Fonseca F (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty: the influence of femoral stems in load sharing and stability. Knee 16:275–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Completo A, Simoes JA, Fonseca F, Oliveira M (2008) The influence of different tibial stem designs in load sharing and stability at the cement-bone interface in revision TKA. Knee 15:227–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH (2003) Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia RM, Hardy BT, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic and septic causes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:82–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghomrawi HM, Kane RL, Eberly LE, Bershadsky B, Saleh KJ, North American Knee Arthroplasty Revision Study G (2009) Patterns of functional improvement after revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2838–2845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, Patterson JJ, Barrack RL, Rorabeck CH (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:158–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1700–1707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA (2001) The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:759–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1440–1447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YH, Kwon OS, Kim K (2008) Analysis of biomechanical effect of stem-end design in revision TKA using Digital Korean model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23:853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lonner JH, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke PA (2001) Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty 16:107–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mabry TM, Hanssen AD (2007) The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:56–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mabry TM, Vessely MB, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ (2007) Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meijerink HJ, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Kampen A, Verdonschot N (2010) A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding. Acta Orthop 81:337–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mow CS, Wiedel JD (1994) Noncemented revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:110–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mow CS, Wiedel JD (1998) Revision total knee arthroplasty using the porous-coated anatomic revision prosthesis: six- to twelve-year results. J Arthroplasty 13:681–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oduwole KO, Molony DC, Walls RJ, Bashir SP, Mulhall KJ (2010) Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc DOI 10.1007/s00167-010-1074-8

  30. Parsley BS, Sugano N, Bertolusso R, Conditt MA (2003) Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:33–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pellegrini VD Jr, O’Connor MI, Garvin KL, Lachiewicz PF (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty: complicated cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 5):72–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Peters CL, Craig MA, Mohr RA, Bachus KN (2003) Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res:158–168

  33. Peters CL, Erickson J, Kloepper RG, Mohr RA (2005) Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. J Arthroplasty 20:302–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peters CL, Erickson JA, Gililland JM (2009) Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems. J Arthroplasty 24:48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG (1997) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 12:896–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shannon BD, Klassen JF, Rand JA, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT (2003) Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems. J Arthroplasty 18:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Skwara A, Figiel J, Knott T, Paletta JR, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Tibesku CO (2009) Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1199–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Takahashi Y, Gustilo RB (1994) Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:156–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vince KG, Long W (1995) Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:172–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Whaley AL, Trousdale RT, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (2003) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:592–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Whiteside LA (2006) Cementless fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:140–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whiteside LA (1993) Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:160–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wood GC, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Bourne RB (2009) Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:810–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Beckmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, J., Lüring, C., Springorum, R. et al. Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 872–879 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1249-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1249-3

Keywords

Navigation