Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical studies on posterior cruciate ligament tears have weak design

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 January 2009

Abstract

Very few studies in the literature focus on isolated PCL injury. Recent studies are in general more optimistic with regard to the results than previous reports. There are few randomized controlled trials and few prospective comparative studies, which may limit the value of the reported results. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the methodology of published studies according to a well-established scoring system. Studies with a high success rate have a low score on methodology design. This study was based on systematic review and level 3 evidence. We performed a literature search and included studies in which the primary aim was to report the outcome after management of isolated PCL injury. The quality of the studies was evaluated using a modified Coleman methodology score, which results in a score between 0 and 100. Studies were also assessed with use of level-of-evidence rating. We collected data on the year of publication, reported results after surgery and conservative treatment, and the outcome scales used to assess the results. Forty studies were included. The average methodology score was 52. No significant difference in outcome was detected between conservative and surgical management. Our hypothesis that a low Coleman score would yield a good clinical result was not verified. This could be caused by the fact that there were very few studies with a high Coleman score. The Coleman methodology score correlated positively with the year of publication and with the level-of-evidence rating. In the 40 reported studies, 12 different outcome scales were used. In conclusion, the generally low methodological quality shows that caution is required when interpreting results after management of injury to the PCL. Firm recommendations on what treatment to choose cannot be given at this time on the basis of these studies. More attention should be paid to methodological quality when designing, conducting and reporting trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Lazzara D (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon in chronic injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:266–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134:663–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellelli A, Mancini P, Polito M, David V, Mariani PP (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a new classification of traumatic tears. Radiol Med 111:828–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boynton MK, Tietjens BR (1996) Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 24:306–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cain EL Jr, Clancy WG Jr (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two-bundle technique. J Knee Surg 15:108–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Chen W, Shih C, Chou S (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: minimal 3 years follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (1999) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:86–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C-H, Chen W-J, Shih C-H (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with quadruple hamstring tendon graft: a double fixation method. J Trauma 52:938–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C-H, Chen W-J, Shih C-H (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 18:603–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:346–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosgarea AJ, Jay PR (2001) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:297–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Pinczewski LA (2003) Endoscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:955–962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dowd GS (2004) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: indications and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:480–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (2004) Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 20:339–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fanelli GC, Giannotti BF, Edson CJ (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic evaluation and treatment. Arthroscopy 10:673–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fanelli GC, Giannotti BF, Edson CJ (1996) Arthroscopically assisted combined posterior cruciate ligament/posterior lateral complex reconstruction. Arthroscopy 12:521–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: part II. Arthroscopy 11:526–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fowler PJ, Messieh SS (1987) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 15:553–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman RT, Duri ZA, Dowd GSE (2002) Combined chronic posterior cruciate and posterolateral corner ligamentous injuries: a comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without reconstruction of the posterolateral corner. Knee 9:309–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Houe T, Jorgensen U (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one- vs. two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin HA, Jae CY, Joon HW (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus achilles tendon allograft—clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21:965–969

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jung TM, Reinhardt C, Scheffler SU, Weiler A (2006) Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1116–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jung Y-B, Jung H-J, Tae S-K, Lee Y-S, Lee K-H (2005) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:247–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC (1993) Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 21:132–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim S-J, Kim H-K, Kim H-J (1999) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a one-incision technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:156–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S-J, Shin S-J, Kim H-K, Jahng J-S, Kim H-S (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16:268–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2006) Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1241–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1994) Posterior cruciate ligament allograft reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device. Arthroscopy 10:371–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction, part 2: results of revision using a 2-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 33:655–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohkoshi Y, Nagasaki S, Yamamoto K, Shibata N, Ishida R, Hashimoto T, Yamane S (2003) Description of a new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and comparison with a 2-incision technique. Arthroscopy 19:825–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohkoshi Y, Nagasaki S, Yamamoto K, Urushibara M, Tada H, Shigenobu K, Hashimoto T, Yamane S (2001) A new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimization of graft angulation. Arthroscopy 17:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA (1986) Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 14:35–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Amaro J, Cohen M, Soares BG, Atallah AN (2005) Interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002939

  40. Petrigliano FAM, McAllister DRM (2006) Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 14:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pournaras J, Symeonides PP (1991) The results of surgical repair of acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 267:103–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Richter M, Kiefer H, Hehl G, Kinzl L (1996) Primary repair for posterior cruciate ligament injuries: an eight-year followup of fifty-three patients. Am J Sports Med 24:298–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Roolker W, Patt TW, van Dijk CN, Vegter M, Marti RK (2000) The Gore-Tex prosthetic ligament as a salvage procedure in deficient knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Roth JH, Bray RC, Best TM, Cunning LA, Jacobson RP (1988) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by transfer of the medial gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med 16:21–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy 22:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV (1999) The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 27:276–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (1999) Natural history study of athletes with PCL-deficient knees. J Sport Rehabil 8:279–288

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2002) Natural history of acute posterior cruciate ligament tears. J Knee Surg 15:103–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shirakura K, Terauchi M, Higuchi H, Takagishi K, Kobayashi Y, Kimura M (2001) Knee stability after repair of isolated midsubstance tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg 9:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tallon C, Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N (2001) Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A critical review. Am J Sports Med 29:315–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Toritsuka Y, Horibe S, Hiro-Oka A, Mitsuoka T, Nakamura N (2004) Conservative treatment for rugby football players with an acute isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:110–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang C-J, Chan Y-S, Weng L-H, Yuan L-J, Chen H-S (2004) Comparison of autogenous and allogenous posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee. Injury 35:1279–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang C-J, Chen H-S, Huang T-W (2003) Outcome of arthroscopic single bundle reconstruction for complete posterior cruciate ligament tear. Injury 34:747–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang C-J, Chen H-S, Huang T-W, Yuan L-J (2002) Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury 33:815–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang C-J, Weng L-H, Hsu C-C, Chan Y-S (2004) Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury 35:1293–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wind WM Jr, Bergfeld JA, Parker RD (2004) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited. Am J Sports Med 32:1765–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Center, Ullevaal University Hospital and Medical School, University of Oslo, 0407, Oslo, Norway

    Anne Marie Eriksen Watsend, Toril M. Ø. Osestad, Rune B. Jacobsen & Lars Engebretsen

Authors
  1. Anne Marie Eriksen Watsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toril M. Ø. Osestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rune B. Jacobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars Engebretsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Engebretsen.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0697-5

Appendix

Appendix

Identified articles (Tables 3, 4)

Table 3 Modified Coleman methodology score for included studies
Full size table
Table 4 The modified Coleman methodology score criteria used on the studies reporting outcome after surgical cartilage repair
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watsend, A.M.E., Osestad, T.M.Ø., Jacobsen, R.B. et al. Clinical studies on posterior cruciate ligament tears have weak design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 140–149 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0632-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0632-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation