Skip to main content
Log in

Tibial plateau stress fracture after unicondylar knee arthroplasty using a navigation system: two case reports

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Satisfactory alignments of components in total knee arthroplasty have been reported since the introduction of navigation systems. And thus, such techniques have been introduced for minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). Several intraoperative fractures of the tibial plateau have been reported in association with minimally invasive UKA and some stress fractures of tibial plateau associated with design of instrument have been reported. Here, we report on two cases of stress fracture of the tibial medial plateau after minimally invasive UKA was performed using a navigation system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 2 a

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical experience at 6 to 10 year follow up. Clin Orthop 367:50–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brumby SA, Carrington R, Zayontz S, Reish T, Scott RD (2003) Tibial plateau stress fracture: a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using 4 guide pinholes. J Arthroplasty 18:809–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Capra SW Jr, Fehring TK (1992) Unicondylar arthroplasty: a survivorship analysis. J Arthroplasty 7:247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11:782–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:40–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Ryd L, Toksvig-Larsen S (2000) The introduction period of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical multicentered, and radiostereometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:608–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg 80B:983–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. Am J Knee Surg 15:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Swanson AB, Swanson GD, Powers T, Khalil MA, Maupin BK, Mayhew DE, Moss SH (1985) Unicompartmental and bicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a finned metal tibial-plateau implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1175–1182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2003) Stress fracture of the medial tibial plateau after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases. J Arthroplasty 18:801–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Kyoo Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seon, J.K., Song, E.K., Yoon, T.R. et al. Tibial plateau stress fracture after unicondylar knee arthroplasty using a navigation system: two case reports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 15, 67–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0097-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0097-7

Keywords

Navigation