Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Infused design. I. Theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper introduces infused design: an approach for establishing effective collaboration between designers from different engineering fields. In infused design, the design problem representation is brought up to a mathematical meta-level, which is common to all engineering disciplines. The reasoning about the problem is then done by using mathematical terminology and tools that, due to their generality, are the same for all engineers, disregarding their background. This gives engineers an opportunity to infuse their work with knowledge, methods, and solutions shared by specialists from other engineering fields. When these knowledge, methods, and solutions cross disciplinary boundaries, they are provably relevant to any problem in another domain to which it can be transformed. The suggested meta-level consists of general discrete mathematical models, called combinatorial representations (CR). Specific mathematical basis for the combinatorial representations chosen in this paper is graph theory although other representations are possible. We explain the theory of infused design and carefully contrast it with other approaches. This comparison clearly demonstrates the advantages of infused design and its potential. We conclude with several practical issues related to the introduction of infused design into practice and briefly discuss the role of information systems in infused design. A companion paper includes several examples that demonstrate the details of infused design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms “he” and “his” may equally refer to “she” and “her” or “they” and “their.”

References

  • Ahmed A, Wallace KM, Blessing LTM (2004) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Des (in press)

  • Akao Y (ed) (1990) Quality function deployment. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Altshuller G (1988) Creativity as an exact science. (translated by Anthony Williams) Gordon and Breach, New York

  • Balabanian N, Bickart TA (1969) Electrical network theory. Wiley, New York

  • Bechkoum K (1997) Intelligent electronic mock-up for concurrent engineering. Expert Syst Appl 12(1):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balazs ME, Brown DC (2000) Design simplification by analogical reasoning. In: Proceedings of the KIC-4: fourth IFIP WG 5.2 workshop on knowledge intensive CAD, Parma, Italy

  • Börner K, Coulon CH, Pippig E, Tammer EC (1996) Structural similarity and adaptation. Advances in case-based reasoning. In: Smith I, Faltings B (eds) Proceedings of the third European workshop on case-based reasoning (EWCBR-96), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 58–75

  • Boujut J-F, Tiger H (2002) A socio-technical research method for analyzing and instrumenting the design. J Des Res 2(2)

  • Bowen J, Bahler D (1992) Frames, quantification, perspectives, and negotiation in constraint networks for life-cycle engineering. Artif Intell Eng 7(4):199–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braha D, Reich Y (2003) Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Res Eng Des 14(4):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE T Eng Manage 48(3):292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Hamilton JR (2000) Signposting, a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Res Eng Des 12:18–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates G, Whitfield RI, Duffy AHB, Hills B (2000) Coordination approaches and systems—Part II: an operational perspective. Res Eng Des 12:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter N, Monarch I, Konda S (1998) Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. J Am Soc Inform Syst 49(13):1206–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutoit A (1996) The role of communication in team-based software engineering projects. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Eastman C, Jeng TS (1999) A database supporting evolutionary product model development for design. Automat Constr 8:305–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RS, Gebala DA (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res Eng Des 6:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkes JW, Kenny KB, Lewis JW, Sarachan BD, Soboiewski MW, Sun JRN (1996) Implementing shared manufacturing services on the world-wide web. Commun ACM 39(2):34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger S, Konda S, Subrahmanian E (1995) Concurrent design happens at the interfaces. AI EDAM 9(2):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod S (1998) How groups co-ordinate their concepts and terminology: Implications for medical informatics. Method Inform Med 37(4–5):471–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel A (1988) Design, analogy and creativity. IEEE Expert 12(3):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of technical systems: a total concept theory for engineering design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Konda S, Monarch I, Sargent P, Subrahmanian E (1992) Shared memory in design: a unifying theme for research and practice. Res Eng Des 4(1):23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulinski J, Gero JS (2001) Constructive representation in situated analogy in design. In: de Vries B, van Leeuwen J, Achten H (eds) CAADFutures 2001, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 507–520

  • Marcovici M (1999) Efficient mechanical rectifier. US Patent Number 5,931,062

  • McMahon CA, Xianyi M (1996) A network approach to parametric design integration. Res Eng Des 8:14–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Messac A, Chen W (2000) The engineering design discipline: is its confounding lexicon hindering its evolution? J Eng Eval Cost Anal 3:67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneman S, Leifer L (1993) Group engineering design practice: the social construction of a technical reality. Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (ICED’93), The Hague, Netherlands, pp 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Neches R, Fikes RE, Finin T, Gruber TR, Senator T, Swartout WR (1991) Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Mag 12(3):36–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1988) Engineering design: a systematic approach. In: Wallace K (ed) The design council. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Park H, Cutkosky MR, Conru AB, Lee S-H (1994) An agent based approach to concurrent cable harness design. AI EDAM 8(1):46–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad B (1996) Concurrent engineering fundamentals, vol I: integrated product and process organization. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  • Qian L (2002) Creative design by analogy. In: Chakrabarti A (ed) Engineering design synthesis—– understanding, approaches and tools. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 245–269

  • Reich Y (1995) A critical review of general design theory. Res Eng Des 7:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y (2000) Improving design rationale capture with QFD. Eng Comput 16(3–4):236–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Shai O (2000) MEMSIS—A MEMS information system. In: Shpitalni M (ed) Proceedings of CIRP design seminar, Haifa, Israel, pp 193–197

  • Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (1992) Concurrent engineering: an extended view. Proceedings of the AID’92 workshop on concurrent engineering, Kluwer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Konda S, Levy SN, Monarch I, Subrahmanian E (1993) New roles for machine learning in design. Artif Intell Eng 8(3):165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Konda S, Levy SN, Monarch I, Subrahmanian E (1996) Varieties and issues of participation and design. Des Studies 17(2):165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Subrahmanian E, Cunningham D, Dutoit A, Konda SL, Patrick R, Westerberg AW, The n-dim group (1999) Building agility for developing agile design information systems. Res Eng Des 11(2):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent P, Subrahmanian E, Downs M, et al. (1992) Materials’ information and conceptual data modeling. In: Barry TI, Reynard KW (eds) Computerization and networking of materials databases: third volume. ASTM STP 1140, American Society For Testing and Materials

  • Schrage M (1991) Shared minds: the new technologies of collaboration. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2001a) The duality relation between mechanisms and trusses. Mech Mach Theory 36(3):343–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2001b) The multidisciplinary combinatorial approach and its applications in engineering. AI EDAM 15(2):109–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2001c) Combinatorial representations in structural analysis. Comput Civil Eng 15(3):193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2001d) Deriving structural theorems and methods using Tellegen’s theorem and combinatorial representations. Int J Solids Struct 38:8037–8052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2002a) Utilization of the dualism between determinate trusses and mechanisms. Mechan Mach Theory 37(11):1307–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2002b) Duality between statical and kinematical engineering systems. The sixth international conference on computational structures technology, Prague, Czech Republic, 4–6 September

  • Shai O (2003a) Transforming engineering problems through graph representations. Adv Eng Inf 17(2):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O (2003b) Design through common graph representations. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, 2–6 September

  • Shai O, Mohr E (2004) Transforming engineering knowledge through graph representations: transferring the Willis method to linkages and trusses. Eng Comput 20(1): 2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Preiss K (1999) Isomorphic representations and well-formedness of engineering systems. Eng Comput 15:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y (2004) Infused design: practice. Res Eng Des (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Rubin D (2003) Representing and analyzing integrated engineering systems through combinatorial representations. Eng Comput 19(4):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Eliahou-Niv S, Rubin D, Slavutin M, Andrusier A (2002) Multidimensional graph representations for MEMS and their applications. ISRAMEMS—the 1st national conference of the Israeli MOEMS society, Haifa, Israel, 21 October

  • Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE T Eng Manage 28:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian E (1991) Notes on empirical studies of engineering tasks and environments. Invited position paper in NSF workshop on information capture and access in engineering environments., Ithaca, NY, pp 567–578

  • Subrahmanian E, Konda SL, Levy SN, Reich Y, Westerberg AW, Monarch IA (1993a) Equations aren’t enough: informal modeling in design. AI EDAM 7(4):257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian E, Coyne R, Konda SL, Levy SN, Martin R, Monarch IA, Reich Y, Westerberg AW (1993b) Support system for different-time different-place collaboration for concurrent engineering. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE workshop on enabling technologies infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WET ICE), Los Alamitos, CA, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 187–191

  • Subrahmanian E, Reich Y, Konda SL, Dutoit A, Cunnungham D, Patrick R, Thomas M, Westerberg AW (1997) The n-dim approach to building design support systems. Proceedings of ASME design theory and methodology DTM ‘97, ASME, New York

  • Tomiyama T, Yoshikawa H (1987) Extended general design theory. In: Yoshikawa H, Warman EA (eds) Design theory for CAD. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 95–130

  • Tomiyama T, Kiriyama T, Takeda H, Xue D, Yoshikawa H (1989) Metamodel: a key to intelligent CAD systems. Res Eng Des 1(1):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiyama T, Yoshioka M, Tsumaya A (2002) A knowledge operation model of synthesis. In: Chakrabarti A (ed) Engineering design synthesis—understanding, approaches and tools. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 67–90

  • Ulrich KT, Seering WP (2002) Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design. In: Chakrabarti A (ed) Engineering design synthesis—understanding, approaches and tools. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 153–177

  • Walton GF (1991) Concurrent engineering. Special feature of IEEE spectrum, July 1991

  • West HH (1993) Fundamentals of structural analysis. Wiley, New York

  • Whitfield RI, Coates G, Duffy AHB, Hills B (2000) Coordination approaches and systems—part I: a strategic perspective. Res Eng Des 12:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Offer Shai & Yoram Reich

Authors
  1. Offer Shai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoram Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Offer Shai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shai, O., Reich, Y. Infused design. I. Theory. Res Eng Design 15, 93–107 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-004-0047-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-004-0047-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation