Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new structural reliability analysis method under non-parameterized probability box variables

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probability box (P-box) model is an effective quantification tool that can deal with aleatory and epistemic uncertainties and can generally be categorized into two classes, namely, parameterized P-box and non-parameterized P-box ones. This paper proposes a new structural reliability analysis method with the non-parameterized P-box uncertainty, through which bounds of the failure probability can be obtained efficiently. For the convenience of calculation, the reliability analysis problems are divided into the univariate and multivariate ones. Firstly, structural failure probability bound analysis for the univariate problem is converted into solving two linear programming models by discretizing the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the P-box variable, which can be solved efficiently by the simplex algorithm. Secondly, an iterative technique is used to decompose the multivariate problem into a series of univariate problems, in which only one non-parameterized P-box's CDF is optimized and the remaining counterparts are fixed. Hence, the failure probability bounds can be obtained by solving a series of linear programming problems. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by investigating three numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azizian M, Almeida JHS (2022) Stochastic, probabilistic and reliability analyses of internally-pressurised filament wound composite tubes using artificial neural network metamodels. Mater Today Commun 31:103627

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrit C, Dubois D, Perrot N (2008) Representing parametric probabilistic models tainted with imprecision. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(15):1913–1928

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung K (1989) Asymptotic approximations for probability integrals. Probab Eng Mech 4(4):187–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns M, Paredis CJJ (2006) Numerical methods for propagating imprecise uncertainty. In: ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pennsylvania

  • Cizelj L, Mavko B, Riesch-Oppermann H (1994) Application of first and second order reliability methods in the safety assessment of cracked steam generator tubing. Nucl Eng Des 147(3):359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant R (1968) Differential and integral calculus. Interscience Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall S, Chandiramani K, Cook R (1966) Some first-passage problems in random vibration. J Appl Mech 33(3):532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Laslett GM (1987) Random set theory and problems of modeling. SIAM Rev 29(4):557–574

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du X (2008) Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Des 130(9):091401

    Google Scholar 

  • Faes MGR, Daub M, Marelli S, Patelli E, Beer M (2021) Engineering analysis with probability boxes: a review on computational methods. Struct Saf 93:102092

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S (2000) Probability bounds analysis solves the problem of incomplete specification in probabilistic risk and safety assessments. In: Ninth United Engineering Foundation Conference on Risk-Based Decisionmaking in Water Resources, Santa Barbara

  • Ferson S, Kreinovich V, Ginzburg L, Myers DS, Sentz K (2003) Constructing probability boxes and dempster-shafer structures. SAND2002-4015, Sandia National Lab

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 100(1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Youn BD, Yoon H (2013) An adaptive dimension decomposition and reselection method for reliability analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 47(3):423–440

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZL, Jiang C, Zhang Z, Fang T, Han X (2017) A decoupling approach for evidence-theory-based reliability design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 56(3):647–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Igusa T, Buonopane SG, Ellingwood BR (2002) Bayesian analysis of uncertainty for structural engineering applications. Struct Saf 24(2):165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanki DR, Kushwaha HS, Verma AK, Ajit S (2009) Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (P-Box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment. Risk Anal 29(5):662–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaymaz I (2005) Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf 27(2):133–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JW, Jiang C, Ni BY (2021) An efficient uncertainty propagation analysis method for problems involving non-parameterized probability-boxes. J Mech Design 143(10):101704

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HB, Jiang C, Jia XY, Long XY, Zhang Z, Guan FJ (2018) A new uncertainty propagation method for problems with parameterized probability-boxes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 172:64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Kuang Z, Yin L, Hu L (2017a) Structural reliability analysis based on probability and probability box hybrid model. Struct Saf 68:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Yin LR, Hu L, Zhang ZY (2017b) An efficient reliability analysis approach for structure based on probability and probability box models. Struct Multidisc Optim 56(1):167–181

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wang X, Xie J, Li B (2020) Construction of probability box model based on maximum entropy principle and corresponding hybrid reliability analysis approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 61(2):599–617

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE, Ahammed M (2004) A fast approximate method for parameter sensitivity estimation in Monte Carlo structural reliability. Comput Struct 82(1):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall W (1971) Introduction to probability and statistics. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Murty GH (1983) Linear programming. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Flessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9(5):489–494

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rathi AK, Chakraborty A (2021) Improved moving least square-based multiple dimension decomposition (MDD) technique for structural reliability analysis. Int J Comput Methods 18(01):2050024

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rekuc SJ, Aughenbaugh JM, Bruns M, Paredis CJJ (2006) Eliminating design alternatives based on imprecise information. SAE Trans 115:208–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöbi R, Sudret B (2017) Structural reliability analysis for p-boxes using multi-level meta-models. Probab Eng Mech 48:27–38

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Mi J, Cheng Y, Bai L, Chen K (2021) Reliability assessment for failure-dependent and uncertain systems: a Bayesian network based on copula method and probability-box. Qual Reliab Eng Int 37(5):1894–1921

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabandeh A, Jia G, Gardoni P (2022) A review and assessment of importance sampling methods for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 97:102216

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhang H, Beer M (2018) Computing tight bounds of structural reliability under imprecise probabilistic information. Comput Struct 208:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Almeida JHS, St-Pierre L, Wang ZL, Castro SGP (2020) Reliability-based buckling optimization with an accelerated Kriging metamodel for filament-wound variable angle tow composite cylinders. Compos Struct 254:112821

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Almeida JHS, Ashok A, Wang ZL, Castro SGP (2022) Lightweight design of variable-angle filament-wound cylinders combining Kriging-based metamodels with particle swarm optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 65(5):1–23

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenson M, Fine TL (1982) Bayes-like decision making with upper and lower probabilities. J Am Stat Assoc 77(377):80–88

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao N-C, Huang H-Z, Wang Z, Pang Y, He L (2011) Reliability sensitivity analysis for structural systems in interval probability form. Struct Multidisc Optim 44(5):691–705

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Cheng G (2003) Discussion on: moment methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 25(2):193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Mullen RL, Muhanna RL (2010) Interval Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 32(3):183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Chu S (2019) A bounding-limit-state-surface-based active learning Kriging method for hybrid reliability analysis under random and probability-box variables. Mech Syst Signal Process 134:106310

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zeng Z, Zio E, Kang R (2017) Probability box as a tool to model and control the effect of epistemic uncertainty in multiple dependent competing failure processes. Appl Soft Comput 56:570–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Jiang C (2021) Evidence-theory-based structural reliability analysis with epistemic uncertainty: a review. Struct Multidisc Optim 63(6):2935–2953

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y-G, Ono T (2001) Moment methods for structural reliability. Struct Saf 23(1):47–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2021JJ40205), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M690988), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51905165).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Material Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, People’s Republic of China

    Huichao Xie

  2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, People’s Republic of China

    Jinwen Li & Daihui Liao

Authors
  1. Huichao Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinwen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daihui Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daihui Liao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

In order to facilitate the reproduction of results presented in this paper, the MATLAB code is provided as the supplementary material.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Byeng D. Youn

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (RAR 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., Li, J. & Liao, D. A new structural reliability analysis method under non-parameterized probability box variables. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03408-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03408-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation