Abstract
In the parameter free approach, FE-based data are used as design variables, such as nodal coordinates and nodal thickness. During shape and thickness optimisation, this approach provides much design freedom for a limited modelling effort. Stress results are, however, very sensitive to the local shape changes that can occur during parameter free optimisation. When stress results are used as response function, this irregularity can complicate the optimisation. As a solution, the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser function for the stresses is introduced as a response function for parameter free shape optimisation. In this function, the local stress results are aggregated to obtain a global measure of stress in a structure. This measure can be used as an objective to reduce the overall stress in the structure or as a constraint to limit the stress in the structure to a maximum allowable value. As a result, the optimal structures are smooth and material efficient. Several examples are presented in this paper to illustrate the use of the parameter free design approach in combination with the stress response function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgün M, Haftka R, Wu K, Walsh J, JH G (2001) Efficient structural optimization for multiple load cases using adjoint sensitivities. AIAA J 39(3):511–516
Arnout S, Lombaert G, Degrande G, De Roeck G (2011) The optimal design of a barrel vault in the conceptual design stage. Comput Struct. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.013
Arora J (ed) (1997) Guide to structural optimization. No 90 in ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice. ASCE, New York
Barthelemy B, Haftka R (1990) Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation. Mech Struct Mach 18(3):407–432
Bennet M, Botkin JA (1984) Structural shape optimization with geometric description and adaptive mesh refinement. AIAA J 23(1):458–464
Bletzinger KU, Firl M, Daoud F (2008) Approximation of derivatives in semi-analytical structural optimization. Comput Struct 86:1404–1416
Bletzinger KU, Firl M, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009a) Optimization of bead topologies for shell structures. In: 8th World congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Lisbon, Portugal
Bletzinger KU, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009b) Extended and integrated numerical form finding and patterning of membrane structures. J Int Assoc Shell Spat Struct 50(1):35–49
Bletzinger KU, Firl M, Fischer M (2010a) Parameter free shape design of thin shells: efficient and effective, parallel solution techniques for very large design problems. In: 2nd international conference on engineering optimization. Lisbon, Portugal
Bletzinger KU, Firl M, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2010b) Optimal shapes of mechanically motivated surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:324–333
Braibant V, Fleury C (1984) Shape optimal design using B-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 44:247–267
Chang K (1992) Optimality criteria methods using K-S functions. Struct Optim (4):213–217
Cheng G, Olhoff N (1993) New method of error analysis and detection in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis. In: Rozvany G (ed) Optimization of large structural systems, vol 1 and 231, pp 361–383
Farin G (1990) Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design, 2nd edn. Computer Science and Scientific Computing, Academic Press, San Diego
Firl M (2010) Optimal shape design of shell structures. Phd thesis, Chair of structural analysis, Technische Universität München
Haftka R, Gürdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization. Solid mechanics and its applications, vol 11. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Hinton E, Rao N, Ozakca M (1991) An integrated approach to structural shape optimization of linearly elastic structures. Part I: general methodology. Comput Syst Eng 2(1):27–39
Holzleitner L, Mahmoud K (1999) Structural shape optimization using MSC/NASTRAN and sequential quadratic programming. Comput Struct 70:487–514
Imam M (1982) Three-dimensional shape optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 18(5):661–673
Kegl M, Brank B (2006) Shape optimization of truss-stiffend shell structures with variable thickness. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(19–22):2611–2634
Kirsch U (1993) Structural optimization. Springer
Lagaros N, Papadopoulos V (2006) Optimum design of shell structures with random geometric, material and thickness imperfections. Int J Solids Struct 43:6948–6964
Lagaros N, Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (2004) Optimum design of shell structures with stiffening beams. AIAA J 42(1):175–184
Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, Ha C, Tortorelli D (2010) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(4): 605–620
Le C, Bruns T, Tortorelli D (2011) A gradient-based, parameter-free approach to shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:985–996
Lee S, Hinton E (2000) Dangers inherited in shells optimized with linear assumptions. Comput Struct 78:473–486
Martins J, Poon M (2005) On structural optimization using constraint aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 6th World congress on strucutral and multidisciplinary optimization. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
París J, Navarrina F, Colominas I, Casteleiro M (2010) Stress constraints sensitivity analysis in structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2110–2122
Pedersen N, Nielsen A (2003) Optimization of practical trusses with constraints on eigenfrequencies, displacements, stresses, and buckling. Struct Multidisc Optim 25:436–445
Qiu G, Li X (2010) A note on the derivation of global stress constriants. Struct Multidisc Optim 40:625–628
Schumacher A (2005) Optimierung mechanischer strukturen. Springer, Berlin
Shimoda M, Iwasa K, Azegami H (2009) A shape optimization method for the optimal free-form design of shell structures. In: 8th World congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Lisbon, Portugal
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1991) A technique for locating function roots and for satisfying equality constraints in optimization. NASA TM-10403 NASA LaRC
Taylor J, Bendsøe M (1984) An interpretation for min–max structural design problems including a method for relaxing constraints. Int J Solids Struct 20(4):301–314
Tysmans T, Adriaenssens S, Wastiels J (2009) Shape optimization of small span textile reinforced cementitious composite shells. In: Proceedings of the international association for of shell & spatial structures symposium. Valencia, Spain
Wang D, Whang W, Jiang J (2002) Truss shape optimization with multiple displacements constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:3597–3612
Wüchner R, Bletzinger KU (2005) Stress-adapted numerical form finding of pre-stressed surfaces by the updated reference strategy. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:143–166
Zienkiewicz O, Campbell J (1973) Shape optimization and sequential linear programming. In: Gallagher R, Zienkiewicz O (eds) Optimum structural design. Wiley, New York, chap 7, pp 109–126
Acknowledgements
This work was prepared during a research stay of the first author at the T.U. München. This research stay has been facilitated by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). The first author is also a PhD. fellow of FWO. The financial support of FWO is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnout, S., Firl, M. & Bletzinger, KU. Parameter free shape and thickness optimisation considering stress response. Struct Multidisc Optim 45, 801–814 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0742-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0742-8