Abstract
The theory of least-weight trusses for one load condition and a stress constraint was established by Michell (Philos Mag 8:589–597, 1904). His work was largely ignored for about 50 years, but from then on, a lot of research effort has been devoted to construct optimal topologies satisfying Michell’s optimality criteria. But the exact analytical Michell layout is still not known for most boundary conditions. It is therefore useful to develop numerical methods for generating approximate Michell-like topologies. We show in this paper that genetic ESO (GESO) methods are suitable for constructing Michell-like layouts. To illustrate the validity of GESO, seven different load cases for a plane structure with two point supports are considered. The Michell-like layouts are generated for vertical or horizontal loads applied at different heights and different angles. The results are compared and classified and a new Michell truss is proposed on the basis of the GESO results. Plane structures under two point loads are also considered, and the GESO results are compared with Melchers (Struct Multidisc Optim 29:85–92, 2005) solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comp Physiol 104:363–393
Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224
Birker T (1995) Generalized Michell structures—exact least weight truss layouts for combined stress and displacement constraints: part II—analytical solutions for a two-bar topology. Struct Optim 9:214–219
Chu DN, Xie YM, Hira A, Steven GP (1995) An evolutionary procedure for structural optimization with displacement constraints. In: Building for the 21st century. Proceeding of the fifth East Asia-Pacific conference on structural engineering and construction, vol 2, pp 1091–1096
Chu DN, Xie YM, Hira A, Steven GP (1996) Evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraint. Finite Elem Anal Des 21:239–251
Chu DN, Xie YM, Hira A, Steven GP (1997) On various aspects of evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints. Finite Elem Anal Des 24:197–212
Chu DN, Xie YM, Steven GP (1998) An evolutionary structural optimization method for sizing problems with discrete design variables. Comput Struct 68:419–431
Cox HL (1965) The design of structures of least weight. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 80–125
Dewhurst P, Fang N, Srithongchai S (2009) A general boundary approach to the construction of Michell truss structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:373–384
Hemp WS (1973) Optimum structures. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 70–101
Lewinski T, Rozvany GIN (2007) Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization II: three-sided polygonal supports. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:337–350
Lewinski T, Rozvany GIN (2008a) Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization III: L-shaped domains. Struct Multidisc Optim 35:165–174
Lewinski T, Rozvany GIN (2008b) Analytical benchmarks for topology optimization IV: square-shaped line support. Struct Multidisc Optim 36:143–158
Lewinski T, Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1994a) Extended exact solutions for least-weight truss layouts. Part I: cantilever with a horizontal axis of symmetry. Int J Mech Sci 36:375–398
Lewinski T, Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1994b) Extended exact solutions for least-weight truss layouts. Part II: unsymmetric cantilevers. Int J Mech Sci 36:399–419
Liang QQ (2005) Performance-based optimization of structures. Spon, London, pp 45–207
Liang QQ, Xie YM, Steven GP (2007) Optimal topology design of bracing systems for multistory steel frames. J Struct Eng 126:823–829
Liu X, Yi WJ, Li QS, Shen PS (2008) Genetic evolutionary structural optimization. J Constr Steel Res 64:305–311
Melchers RE (2005) On extending the range of Michell-like optimal topology structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 29:85–92
Michell AGM (1904) The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. Philos Mag 8:589–597
Rozvany GIN (1996) Some shortcomings in Michell’s truss theory. Struct Optim 12:244–260
Rozvany GIN (1997) Partial relaxation of the orthogonality requirement for classical Michell trusses. Struct Optim 13:271–274
Rozvany GIN (1998) Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimization. Struct Optim 15:42–48
Rozvany GIN (2009) A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 37:217–237
Rozvany GIN, Birker T (1995) Generalized Michell structures—exact least-weight truss layouts for combined stress and displacement constraints: part I—general theory for plane trusses. Struct Optim 9:178–188
Rozvany GIN, Gollub W (1990) Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports—I. Int J Mech Sci 32:1021–1043
Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optim 4:250–254
Rozvany GIN, Gollub W, Zhou M (1997) Exact Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports—part II. Struct Optim 14:138–149
Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49:885–896
Xie YM, Steven GP (1994) Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure. Eng Comput 11:295–302
Yang XY (1999) Bi-directional evolutionary method for stiffness and displacement optimisation. Degree thesis of master of engineering, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne, pp 33–113
Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89:309–336
Acknowledgements
[Acknowledgement] The authors are indebted to National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 50908082) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Yi, WJ. Michell-like 2D layouts generated by genetic ESO. Struct Multidisc Optim 42, 111–123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0474-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0474-1