Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die Implantation von Knietotalendoprothesen (Knie-TEP) gehört zu den häufigsten Operationen in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Der Erfolg hängt neben patientenassoziierten Faktoren und einem suffizienten Weichteilbalancing wesentlich von der korrekten Ausrichtung der Komponenten ab. Ein Instrument zur Verbesserung der Implantationsgenauigkeit stellt die computerassistierte Navigation dar, deren höhere Präzision in Bezug auf die Beinachse belegt ist. Dieses Verfahren ist in Europa und Nordamerika etabliert. Im deutschen DRG-System werden die damit verbundenen Aufwendungen bisher nicht vergütet. Ziel der Untersuchung ist deshalb eine Analyse der Kosten bei Implantation einer Knie-TEP mittels computerassistierter Navigation gegenüber der konventionellen Technik.
Methodik
Es wurden die Anschaffungskosten verschiedener Navigationssysteme (Abschreibungsmodelle über 5 und 10 Jahre), die jährlichen Kosten für Wartung und Software-Updates sowie die pro Operation anfallenden Kosten (Verbrauchsmaterial, Verlängerung der Operationszeit) berücksichtigt. Die zusätzliche Operationszeit wurde anhand einer Metaanalyse der aktuellen Literatur ermittelt. Es wurden Modellsituationen mit 25, 50, 100, 200 und 500 navigierten Knie-TEP/Jahr berechnet.
Ergebnisse
Die Höhe der finanziellen Mehrbelastung durch die computerassistierte Navigation hängt hauptsächlich vom jährlichen Operationsvolumen und der Verlängerung der Operationszeit ab. Eine relevante Verringerung der zusätzlich entstehenden Kosten zeigte sich in den verschiedenen Modellsituationen zwischen 50 und 100 Operationen/Jahr. Bei 100 navigierten Knie-TEP/Jahr, einer zusätzlichen Operationszeit von 14 min und Abschreibung der Investitionskosten über 10 Jahre betragen die Zusatzkosten je nach Navigationssystem von 300–395 €/Operation.
Schlussfolgerung
Die computerassistierte Navigation bei Knietotalendoprothesen ist mit Zusatzkosten verbunden. Unter ökonomischen Gesichtspunkten erscheint eine Anzahl von >50 navigierten Knie-TEP/Jahr sinnvoll. Die Kosteneffektivität kann erst abgeschätzt werden, wenn Langzeitergebnisse eine tatsächliche Reduktion der Revisionen oder ein verbessertes klinisches Ergebnis zeigen.
Abstract
Background
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent procedures in orthopaedic surgery. The outcome depends on a range of factors including alignment of the leg and the positioning of the implant in addition to patient-associated factors. Computer-assisted navigation systems can improve the restoration of a neutral leg alignment. This procedure has been established especially in Europe and North America. The additional expenses are not reimbursed in the German DRG system (Diagnosis Related Groups). In the present study a cost analysis of computer-assisted TKA compared to the conventional technique was performed.
Methods
The acquisition expenses of various navigation systems (5 and 10year depreciation), annual costs for maintenance and software updates as well as the accompanying costs per operation (consumables, additional operating time) were considered. The additional operating time was determined on the basis of a meta-analysis according to the current literature. Situations with 25, 50, 100, 200 and 500 computer-assisted TKAs per year were simulated.
Results
The amount of the incremental costs of the computer-assisted TKA depends mainly on the annual volume and the additional operating time. A relevant decrease of the incremental costs was detected between 50 and 100 procedures per year. In a model with 100 computer-assisted TKAs per year an additional operating time of 14 mins and a 10 year depreciation of the investment costs, the incremental expenses amount to € 300-395 depending on the navigation system.
Conclusions
Computer-assisted TKA is associated with additional costs. From an economical point of view an amount of more than 50 procedures per year appears to be favourable. The cost-effectiveness could be estimated if long-term results will show a reduction of revisions or a better clinical outcome.
Literatur
Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T et al (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35(10):1056–1065
Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M et al (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):261–269
Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (428):26–34
BQS (2007) BQS-Qualitätsreport 2007. BQS, Düsseldorf, http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2007
Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372–377
Church JS, Scadden JE, Gupta RR et al (2007) Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):481–485
Carl Gustav Carus Universitätsklinikum (2008) Controlling. Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden
Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J et al (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20(3):282–288
Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A et al (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156–162
Friederich N, Verdonk R (2008) The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(6):536–543
Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T (2003) Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 32(6):469–476
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):709–714
Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A (2008) Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 15(2):80–84
Jerosch J, Fuchs S, Heisel J (1997) Knieendoprothetik – eine Standortbestimmung. Dtsch Arztebl 94(8):A-449/B-361/C-339
Kessler O, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB et al (2006) Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: Effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition. Clin Biomech 21(6):603–609
Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):123–131
Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH (2007) Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):471–476
Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, Mihalko WM (1999) A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22(7):698–702
Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(1):77–79
Luo JW, Yu CT, Qin J, Xu DC (2006) Rotational malalignment causing patellofemoral complications after total knee replacement. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 26(2):217–219
Lüring C, Bathis H, Tingart M et al (2006) Computer assistance in total knee replacement - a critical assessment of current health care technology. Comput Aided Surg 11(2):77–80
Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C et al (2008) Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and ct evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(8):1039–1044
Macule-Beneyto F, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM et al (2006) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 30(6):536–540
Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M et al (2007) Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:178–184
Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R et al (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22(8):1097–1106
Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U et al (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):236–243
Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15(2):75–79
Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ (2007) The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(11):2389–2397
Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res (299):153–156
Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C et al (2007) The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(2):235–240
Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C et al (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparat Apparat Mot 87(1):18–28
Slover JD, Tosteson AN, Bozic KJ et al (2008) Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(7):1492–1500
Sparmann M, Wolke B (2003) Value of navigation and robot-guided surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 32(6):498–505
Spencer JM. Chauhan SK, Sloan K et al (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):477–480
Stulberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS (2006) Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):47–54
Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M et al (2006) Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(1):47–52
Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 38(2):349–355
Windhagen H, Thorey F, Ostermeier S et al (2005) Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 34(11):1125–1130
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cerha, O., Kirschner, S., Günther, KP. et al. Kostenanalyse zur Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde 38, 1235–1240 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1473-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1473-z