Skip to main content
Log in

Frauenärztlich-pädiatrische Kooperation

Einfluss der Pränatalmedizin auf das perinatale Outcome von Mutter und Kind

Cooperation between gynecologists and pediatricians

Influence of prenatal medicine on the perinatal outcome of mother and child

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Wie kein anderer Bereich in der Medizin ist die Geburtshilfe in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten durch die Pränatalmedizin beeinflusst worden. Sie hat entscheidend dazu beigetragen, dass sich das vorgeburtliche Problemspektrum gänzlich gewandelt hat und viele der früheren Herausforderungen gelöst sind. Stellten früher noch das Erkennen von Mehrlingen oder die Bestimmung des Gestationsalters zentrale Probleme dar, können diese heute durch den Ultraschall als gelöst betrachtet werden. Dagegen sind neue Fragestellungen entstanden, die risikostratifiziert erörtert werden. Einen maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die Reduktion der postpartalen Mortalität und Morbidität hat die pränatale Diagnose fetaler Fehlbildungen.

Abstract

During recent decades, prenatal medicine has had a substantial influence on obstetric management. As a result, some of the obstetric problems such as correct estimation of the delivery date or detection of multiple pregnancies can be considered as resolved. However, we are now confronted with other medical questions, which we try to sort out by assessing patient-specific risks. The detection of fetal anomalies plays a major role in the reduction of postnatal morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. (o A) (1965) Control of life. Audacious experiments promise decades of added life, superbabies with improved minds and bodies, and even a kind of immortality. Life

  2. (o A) (1966) Medical „miracles“ with ultrasound. The exciting revolution in our classrooms. Family Circle

  3. Sabbagha R (1987) Gestational age. Diagnostic ultrasound applied to obstetrics and gynaecology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 91–111

  4. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (2010) Leitlinie „Standards zur Ultraschalluntersuchung in der Frühschwangerschaft“. http://www.dggg.de/fileadmin/public_docs/Leitlinien/3–1–2-us-fruehsws-2010.pdf. Zugegriffen: 05. März 2011

  5. Sherod C, Sebire NJ, Soares W et al (1997) Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 at the 10–14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10(6):387–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP (1990) Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet 336(8712):387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K et al (1997) The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(10):1203–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Sepulveda-Gonzalez G et al (2007) Discordance in nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(5):527–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Hughes K et al (1996) The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7(6):421–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA (2010) Richtlinien über die ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung. http://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62–492–429/RL_Mutter-2010–02–18.pdf. Zugegriffen: 05. März 2011

  11. Kagan KO, Wright D, Baker A et al (2008) Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(6):618–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T et al (2011) Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 31(1):90–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poon LC, Stratieva V, Piras S et al (2010) Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: combined screening by uterine artery Doppler, blood pressure and serum PAPP-A at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 30(3):216–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y et al (2010) Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 116(2 Pt 1):402–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs IB, Muller H, Abdul-Khaliq H et al (2007) Immediate and long-term outcomes in children with prenatal diagnosis of selected isolated congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(1):38–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moise KJ Jr (2008) Management of rhesus alloimmunization in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 112(1):164–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mari G, Deter RL, Carpenter RL et al (2000) Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. N Engl J Med 342(1):9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber A, Diehl W, Bregenzer T et al (2006) Stage-related outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic laser coagulation. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):333–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M et al (2004) Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 351(2):136–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deprest JA, Nicolaides K, Gratacos E (2011) Fetal surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia is back from never gone. Fetal Diagn Ther 29(1):6–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein keine Interessenkonflikte vorliegen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.O. Kagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kagan, K., Hoopmann, M. Frauenärztlich-pädiatrische Kooperation. Gynäkologe 44, 429–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2746-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2746-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation