Abstract.
Background and aims:
A standardised and systematic analysis of commitment laws in the European Union Member States is still missing. This study aimed at gathering, describing and analysing information on the differences or similarities of legal frameworks for involuntary placement and treatment of mentally ill patients across the European Union Member States.
Method:
Information was gathered by means of a detailed questionnaire filled in by experts from all EU Member States. Legal criteria for compulsory admission and details of the assessment and decision process of compulsory admission are outlined.
Results:
Although common patterns among Member States can be identified upon comparison of crucial legislative or procedural details, these patterns are far from being consistent across all analysed items or approaches. With regard to compulsory admission quotas no significant influence of legal commitment criteria and the involvement of judicial authorities could be found, but Member States with an obligatory inclusion of a legal representative during the commitment procedure showed significantly lower compulsory admission quotas.
Conclusions:
Results of this study show the strong necessity for further research in this field. Common international health reporting standards as annually updated involuntary placement rates detailed for regular and emergency cases seem to be essential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelbaum PS (1997) Almost a Revolution: An International Perspective on the Law of Involuntary Commitment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 25:135–147
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1998) 8th General Report on the Cpt’s covering the period 1 January to 31 December 1997. http://www.cpt.coe.int/en/annual/rep-08.htm
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom (1950) http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/cadreprincipal.htm
European Court of Human Right (1981) Winterwerp-Case http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc
Faulkner LR, McFarland BH, Bloom JD (1989) An Empirical Study of Emergency Commitment. Am J Psychiatry 146:182–186
Gendreau C (1997) The Rights of Psychiatric Patients in the Light of the Principles Announced by the United Nations. Int J Law Psychiatry 20:259–278
Harding TW, Curran WJ (1979) Mental Health Legislation and its Relationship to Program Development. Harvard J Legislation 16:19–58
Harding TW (1989) The Application of The European Convention of Human Rights to the Field of Psychiatry. Int J Law Psychiatry 12:245–262
Harding TW (2000) Human rights law in the field of mental health: a critical review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 101:24–30
Hoge SK, Appelbaum PS, Greer A (1989) An Empirical Comparison of the Stone and Dangerousness Criteria for Civil Commitment. Am J Psychiatry 146:170–175
Hoyer G (2000) On the justification for civil commitment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 399(Suppl):65–71
Phelan C, Link BG (1998) The growing belief that people with mental illness are violent: The role of the dangerousness criterion for civil commitment. Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33:7–12
Riecher-Rössler A, Rössler W (1993) Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients—an international comparison. Acta Psychiatr Scand 87:231–236
Rosenman S (1998) Psychiatrists and compulsion: a map of ethics. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 32:785–793
Salize HJ, Dreßing H (2004) Epidemiology of Involuntary Placements of Mentally Ill across the European Union. Br J Psychiatry 184(2):163–168
Salize HJ, Dreßing H, Peitz M (2002) Compulsory Admission and Involuntary Treatment of Mentally Ill Patients Legislation and Practice in EU-Member States http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_projects/2000/promotion/fp_promotion_2000_frep_08_en.pdf
Segal SP, Laurie TA, Segal MJ (2001) Factors in the Use of Coercive Retention in Civil Commitment Evaluations in Psychiatric Emergency Services. Psychiatr Serv 52:514–520
Spengler A (1994) Sofortige zwangsweise Unterbringungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 1991–1992: Erste Ergebnisse. Psychiatrische Praxis 21:118–120
Steadman HJ, Gounis K, Dennis D (2001) Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program. Psychiatr Serv 52:330–336
Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Hiday VA (2001) A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psychiatr Serv 52:325–329
Zinkler M, Priebe S (2002) Detention of the mentally ill in Europe-a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 106:3–8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dressing, H., Salize, H.J. Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39, 797–803 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0814-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0814-9