Skip to main content
Log in

Application of fluorescence-based semi-automated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Genetic mapping and the selection of closely linked molecular markers for important agronomic traits require efficient, large-scale genotyping methods. A semi-automated multifluorophore technique was applied for genotyping AFLP marker loci in barley and wheat. In comparison to conventional 33P-based AFLP analysis the technique showed a higher resolution of amplicons, thus increasing the number of distinguishable fragments. Automated sizing of the same fragment in different lanes or different gels showed high conformity, allowing subsequent unambigous allele-typing. Simultaneous electrophoresis of different AFLP samples in one lane (multimixing), as well as simultaneous amplification of AFLP fragments with different primer combinations in one reaction (multiplexing), displayed consistent results with respect to fragment number, polymorphic peaks and correct size-calling. The accuracy of semi-automated co-dominant analysis for hemizygous AFLP markers in an F2 population was too low, proposing the use of dominant allele-typing defaults. Nevertheless, the efficiency of genetic mapping, especially of complex plant genomes, will be accelerated by combining the presented genotyping procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 10 April 1999 / Accepted: 11 May 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarz, G., Herz, M., Huang, X. et al. Application of fluorescence-based semi-automated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100, 545–551 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050071

Navigation