Abstract
Intersubgenomic heterosis in rapeseed has been revealed in previous studies by using traditional Brassica napus (AnAnCnCn) to cross partial new type B. napus with Ar/Cc introgression from the genomes of B. rapa and B. carinata, respectively. To further enlarge the genetic basis of B. napus and to facilitate a sustained heterosis breeding in rapeseed, it is crucial to create a population for substantial new type B. napus diversified at both A/C genomes. In this experiment, hundreds of artificial hexaploid plants (ArArBcBcCcCc) involving hundreds of B. carinata/B. rapa combinations were first crossed with elite lines of partial new type B. napus. The pentaploid plants (AABCC) were open-pollinated in isolated conditions, and their offspring were successively self-pollinated and intensively selected for two generations. Thereafter, a population of substantial new type B. napus mainly with a genomic composition of ArArCcCc harbouring genetic diversity from 25 original cultivars of B. rapa and 72 accessions of B. carinata was constructed. The population was cytologically verified to have the correct chromosome constitution of AACC and differed genetically from traditional B. napus, in terms of the genome components of Ar/Cc and Bc as well as the novel genetic variations induced by the interspecific hybridisation process. Synchronously, rich phenotypic variation with plenty of novel valuable traits was observed in the population. The origin of the novel variations and the value of the population are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams KL, Wendel JF (2005) Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants. Trends Genet 21:539–543
Akbar M (1989) Chromosomal stability and performance of resynthesized Brassica napus produced for gain in earliness and short-day response. Hereditas 111:247–253
Becker HC, Engqvist GM, Karlsson B (1995) Comparison of rapeseed cultivars and resynthesized lines based on allozyme and RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 91:62–67
Chen BY, Heneen WK, Jonsson R (1988) Resynthesis of Brassica napus L. through interspecific hybridization between B. alboglabra Bailey and B. campestris L. with special emphasis on seed colour. Plant Breed 101:52–59
Cheung F, Trick M, Drou N, Lim YP, Park JY, Kwon SJ, Kim JA, Scott R, Pires JC, Paterson AH, Town C, Bancroft L (2009) Comparative analysis between homoeologous genome segments of Brassica napus and its progenitor species reveals extensive sequence-level divergence. Plant Cell 21:1912–1928
Delourme R et al (2006) Major gene and polygenic resistance to Leptosphaerie maculans in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur J Plant Pathol 114:41–52
Diers BW, Osborn TC (1994) Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus germplasm based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 87:697–704
Doerksen TK, Kannenberg LW, Lee EA (2003) Effect of recurrent selection on combining ability in maize breeding populations. Crop Sci 43:1652–1658
Downey RK, Röbbelen G (1989) Brassica species. In: Röbbelen G, Downey RK, Ashri A (eds) Oil crops of the world. McGraw–Hill, New York, pp 167–169
Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC (2007) Genomic change in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell 19:3403–3417
Ge XH, Li ZY (2007) Intra- and intergenomic homology of B-genome chromosomes in trigenomic combinations of the cultivated Brassica species revealed by GISH analysis. Chromosome Res 15:849–861
Gómez-Campo C, Prakash S (1999) Origin and domestication. In: Gómez-Campo C (ed) Biology of Brassica genospecies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 33–58
Inomata N (1980) Hybrid progenies of the cross, Brassica campestris × B. oleracea. I. cytogenetical studies on F1 hybrids. Jpn J Genetics 3:1189–1202
Jiang Y, Tian E, Li R, Chen L, Meng J (2007) Genetic diversity of Brassica carinata with emphasis on the interspecific crossability with B. rapa. Plant Breed 126:487–491
Lee HS, Chen ZJ (2001) Protein-coding genes are epigenetically regulated in Arabidopsis polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6753–6758
Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2008) Genomic plasticity and diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320:481–483
Li Z, Heneen WK (1999) Production and cytogenetics of intergenetic hybrids between the three Brassica diploids and Orychphragmus violaceus. Theor Appl Genet 99:694–704
Li ZY, Li MT, Huang RG, Wu XM, Song YC (2002) Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) discriminates the A, B and C genomes in Brassica allotetraploid species. Chin J Oil Crop Sci 24:10–14
Li M, Qian W, Meng J, Li Z (2004) Construction of novel Brassica napus genotypes through chromosomal substitution and elimination using interploid species hybridization. Chromosome Res 12:417–426
Li M, Chen X, Meng J (2006) Intersubgenomic heterosis in rapeseed production with a partial new-typed Brassica napus containing subgenome Ar from B. rapa and Cc from Brassica carinata. Crop Sci 46:234–242
Liu H (2000) Genetic and breeding in rapeseed. Chinese Agricultural Universitatis, Beijing, pp 182–188
Lu C, Masahiro K (2001) Fertilization fitness and relation to chromosome number in interspecific progeny between Brassica napus and B. campestris study using current and resynthesized B. napus. Breed Sci 51:73–81
Ma XF, Gustafson JP (2006) Timing and rate of genome variation in Triticale following allopolyploidization. Genome 49:950–958
Mikkelsen TR, Jensen J, Jørgensen RB (1996) Inheritance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) RAPD markers in a backcross progeny with Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet 92:492–497
Moore G (2002) Meiosis in allopolyploids—the importance of ‘Teflon’ chromosomes. Trends Genet 18:456–463
Morgan CL, Bruce DM, Child R, Ladbrooke ZL, Arthur AE (1998) Genetic variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic B. napus. Field Crops Res 58:153–165
Morinaga T (1928) Preliminary note on interspecific hybridization in Brassica. Proc Imp Acad 4:620–622
Pearson OH (1972) Cytoplasmically inheritable male sterility characteristics and flavour components from a species cross B. nigra Koch × B. oleracea L. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 97:397–402
Pires JC, Zhao J, Schranz ME, Leon EJ, Quijada P, Lukens LN, Osborn TC (2004) Flowering time divergence and genomic rearrangements in resynthesized Brassica polyploids (Brassicaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 82:675–688
Plieske J, Sturss D (2001) STS markers linked to Phoma resistance genes of the Brassica B-genome revealed sequence homology between Brassica nigra and Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 102:483–488
Pontes O et al (2004) Chromosomal locus rearrangements are a rapid response to formation of the allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica genome. Proc Natl Acad USA 101:18240–18245
Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassicas, a review. Opera Bot 55:3–57
Qian W, Chen X, Fu D, Zou J, Meng J (2005) Intersubgenomic heterosis in seed yield potential observed in a new type of Brassica napus introgressed with partial Brassica rapa genome. Theor Appl Genet 110:1187–1194
Qiu D, Morgan C, Shi J, Long Y, Liu J, Li R, Zhuang X, Wang Y, Tan X, Dietrich E, Weihmann T, Everett C, Vanstraelen S, Beckett P, Fraser F, Trick M, Barnes S, Wilmer J, Schmidt R, Li J, Li D, Meng J, Bancroft I (2006) A comparative linkage map of oilseed rape and its use for QTL analysis of seed oil and erucic acid content. Theor Appl Genet 114:67–80
Rashid A, Rakow G, Downey RK (2006) Development of yellow seeded Brassica napus through interspecific crosses. Plant Breed 2:127–134
Ren JP, Dickson MH, Earle ED (2000) Improved resistance to bacterial soft rot by protoplast fusion between Brassica rapa and B. oleracea. Theor Appl Genet 100:810–819
Shiga T (1970) Rape breeding by interspecific crossing between Brassica napus and Brassica campestris in Japan. Jpn Agric Res Q 5:5–10
Snowdon RJ, Köhler W, Friedt W, Köhler A (1997) Genomic in situ hybridization in Brassica amphidiploids and interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 95:1320–1324
Song YC, Gustafson JP (1993) Physical mapping of 5S rDNA gene complex in rice (Oryza sativa). Genome 36:658–661
Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988a) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) 2. Preliminary analysis of subspecies within B. campestris (syn. rapa) and B. oleracea. Theor Appl Genet 76:593–600
Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988b) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) 1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphidiploid species. Theor Appl Genet 75:784–794
Suwabe K, Tsukazaki H, Iketani H, Hatakeama K, Fujimura M, Nunome T, Fukuoka H, Matsumoto S, Hirai M (2003) Identification of two loci for resistance to clubroot (Plasmodiophora Brassicae Woronin) in Brassica rapa L. Theor Appl Genet 107:997–1002
UN (1935) Genomic analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452
Wang J et al (2004) Stochastic and epigenetic changes of gene expression in Arabidopsis polyploids. Genetics 167:1961–1973
Zamir D (2001) Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genetics 2:983–989
Zou J, Zhu J, Huang S, Tian E, Xiao Y, Fu D, Tu J, Fu T, Meng J (2010) Broadening the avenue of intersubgenomic heterosis in oilseed Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 120:283–290
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Professor Dr Zaiyun Li of Huazhong Agricultural University for his valuable help with the GISH technique, Dr Xingliang Liu for critical reading the manuscript. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project code: 30830073) National 863 High Technology Program, P. R. China (2008AA10Z147).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by H. Becker.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, Y., Chen, L., Zou, J. et al. Development of a population for substantial new type Brassica napus diversified at both A/C genomes. Theor Appl Genet 121, 1141–1150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1378-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1378-6